It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: booyakasha
According to the Primer fields black holes do not exist. I believe if this theory is correct, that a massive jet stream of light or matter or both, will blow out the top and bottom of the magnetic poles. I suggest watching the series, it is very interesting to say the least.
Primer Fields is nonsense.
It suggests that the only real underlying force is ElectroMagnetism.
It also suggests that because something looks like something else, they have the same properties.
To believe that because one thing looks like another that they are the same in essence is magical thinking, not science.
originally posted by: BigBrotherDarkness
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: booyakasha
According to the Primer fields black holes do not exist. I believe if this theory is correct, that a massive jet stream of light or matter or both, will blow out the top and bottom of the magnetic poles. I suggest watching the series, it is very interesting to say the least.
Primer Fields is nonsense.
It suggests that the only real underlying force is ElectroMagnetism.
It also suggests that because something looks like something else, they have the same properties.
To believe that because one thing looks like another that they are the same in essence is magical thinking, not science.
then how does any opposing theory rectify the hexigonal patterning found on metallic primer domes and at planetary poles?
originally posted by: BigBrotherDarkness
a reply to: chr0naut
thats half the equation asked yes... and the planets hexagonal pattern still requires rectification as does electromagnetic DC current btw.
originally posted by: Kantjil
a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness
So what you guys talking about?
originally posted by: wildespace
This thread has wandered off in a strange direction. Let's get back to the black holes, please.
~~~
No, a black hole can never get full; the more it eats the more massive (and hungrier) it grows.
originally posted by: wildespace
This thread has wandered off in a strange direction. Let's get back to the black holes, please.
~~~
No, a black hole can never get full; the more it eats the more massive (and hungrier) it grows.
originally posted by: lostbook
originally posted by: wildespace
This thread has wandered off in a strange direction. Let's get back to the black holes, please.
~~~
No, a black hole can never get full; the more it eats the more massive (and hungrier) it grows.
So, then could the entire galaxy be one massive Black hole or even the known Universe...? How do we know that we aren't already inside of one?