It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Are Trump or Hillary really unstoppable? are they going to push USA deep into WWIII?

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 10:18 AM
a reply to: carewemust

I don't agree of your point of view, it is possible to predict that the worst case scenario in the international arena will arrive with:

1) a President of the USA compromised with sectarianism, racism and fundamentalism like Donald Trump, isolating us from the rest of the continent that provides us of raw materials and consume our products massively and also of any potential ally in the middle east sending the entire Arab world , as well as nuclear powers like Turkey and Pakistan, easily to the hands of ISIS.

2) a political manipulator like Hillary Clinton that is so irresponsible that is supporting coup d'états in other countries, like Ukraine, in her mad plan to push us to a confrontation with Russia in Europe. After the Boston Marathon bombing it is clear that ISIS is in alliance with Chenyans and our enemies are also enemies of Russia. Now, She also has changed loyal political allies that we know by sure from decades of experience are trustful , like Hosni Mubarak, for bandits in alliance with ISIS like the Islamic Brotherhood of Egypt,Libya and Tunisia.

For the aggravation of the wars in the world, and the chances to get peace , there is indeed a great difference depending of who is elected President of the USA this year.

The best choices that American voters have right now to put in the white house professional politicians that are willing to work for the distension of the world, to explore solutions that can maintain under control regional conflicts preventing that they merge in only one colossal great world war are Marco Rubio in the Republican side of politics and Bernie Sanders in the Democratic one.

Governor John Kasich and Dr Ben Carson must drop immediately from the race, following the example of Martin O'Malley in the democratic side, for the best national interest, since their campaign are helping a lot to allow Trump to get the GOP nomination.


The Angel of Lightness

edit on 2/23/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 06:52 PM
a reply to: Looselungjones

Since THIS ^^^^GUY seems all PEACHY about the moron in office who is setting up WWII,due to planed traitorous acts or stupidity,I'LL just BEG to differ.
I suppose YOU didn't find out about the nerve agent we recovered in Iraq either.

posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 07:15 PM
Saying Trump hates Muslims is idiotic. W Bush killed a million+ Iraqi's on his watch. Obama is headed for a million+ dead Syrians because if he wasn't giving the ok it wouldn't be happening. If Obama had said "no" to the Saudis, Qatar, Turkey, etc it would never have gotten going.

Trump was against what the US did in Iraq, he's against what's going on in Syria, and he's against doing more in Syria, other than working with the Russians to stabilize the situation and shut down actual terrorists, which will stabilize the country and make it safe again.

So I think it's pretty safe to say that Bush and Obama are the ones who 'hate Muslims' if we're going to say that some of the politician's out there must.

When Trump said 'keep all Muslims out until I get some answers' the mass media only covered the first part, the 'keep all Muslims out' part, and distorted the meaning completely.

The 'until I get some answers' part was the important part and so something "they" wanted swept under the rug, because those answers are who knows what...stuff like who really is to blame for destroying the twin towers of the World Trade Center and why.

Muslims talk about it themselves all the time. Their militants take the money and do the dirty work, but who is pulling the strings? The CIA? Mossad? Etc? Trump is thus an ally to these ordinary, everyday, civil Muslims who wish they lived in a world where governments did not regularly employ Islamic militants for acts of false-flag terror, undermining governments, destabilizing entire countries and regions, and making the lives of Muslims everywhere miserable from the aspersion it casts on them and every other Muslim and on their religion itself.

Trump wants to get those answers...and then what he'd want to do next is obvious. He'd want to say "No. No. Hell no. We're shutting it down. We're shutting it all down. You're done. You're fired. You're all fired."

posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 08:25 PM
a reply to: 11andrew34

Excuse me dear 11andrew34, the comments of Donald Trump In South Carolina praising shooting of Muslims with bullets of pig's blood is running right now around all the web and since about 4 days ago, just as a remark, if for any reason you have not yet checked it.

Pls check:


The Angel of Lightness

edit on 2/23/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 09:38 PM

originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: 11andrew34

Excuse me dear 11andrew34, the comments of Donald Trump In South Carolina praising shooting of Muslims with bullets of pig's blood is running right now around all the web and since about 4 days ago, just as a remark, if for any reason you have not yet checked it.

Pls check:


The Angel of Lightness

Not what he said he was talking about a story that was started. To discredit Pershing and his acomplishment of taking care of moros. Many could not believe he got them to surrender with so little loss of life. That started these rumors and it has been brought up in politics before for example Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Bob Graham (D-Fla.) cited as an example a dinner he attended with people who work on intelligence issues and have connections to the intelligence community. The dinner conversation ranged in part on how U.S. military commander "Black Jack" Pershing used Islam's prohibition on pork to help crush an insurgency on the southern Philippine island of Mindanao after the Spanish-American War at the turn of the last century.

And a Massachusetts senator distributed a pamphlet with the same story. This story has been told for a hundred years. Now enough history please show me where Trump said he wants to dip bullets in pigs blood and kill muslims he said no such thing. What he did say is we need to be tough on terrorists can't believe your making me defend Trump because of stupidity I need a shower now.

posted on Feb, 26 2016 @ 03:50 PM
I find it very difficult to have a WW3 since NATO is waaaaay too weak to start it. From a technological point of view NATO is inferior in almost all fronts. Most of its heavy and advanced weaponry has virtually not improved since the end of the cold war. From a commitment/morale point of view, NATO is inferior as well. So what they are resorting to do is simply, deceptive propaganda to boast a commitment and a strength that is not actully there any longer. As it stands, Canada wouldn't be able to engage a fight with anything except its own native population. Europe is busy with mind control, propaganda chaos and other ridiculous acts to try to convince the world that the EU is functioning normally and it has absolutely nothing to do with a fanatical manic regime of plutocrats served by burocrats always ready to be the waiter for today's banker.

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 11:31 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 04:23 PM
The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,
Dear Readers,

If you are republican sympathizer and you have not yet voted remember that today is an extremely challenging day for the GOP. Chances are that the Party become split for the arrival of an openly Anti Christian candidate that is a Tycoon willing to buy the political power at any cost.

Please stop Donald Trump today, otherwise we are in risk to see America isolated in the western hemisphere, no Latin American country wants to deal with him as President and also the entire Muslim world rejects him, in times we need disparately allies in middle east.

We have seen the boost of a candidate that is clearly a menace for the world peace in the last months, somebody that can multiply the problems America has right now if he becomes elected President.

Please use your vote to support the strongest anti Trump rival in each State to vote for. By voting divided is not going to produce any positive result, it is joining forces around the candidate that is leading behind or ahead of Trump in that state that we can make it.

These are the best candidates to support today Super Tuesday depending on which state you are right now:

American Samoa voters, pls vote Cruz.
Alaska voters, pls vote Cruz.
Alabama voters, pls vote Rubio.
Arkansas voters, pls vote Cruz.
Florida voters, pls vote Rubio.
Minnesota voters, pls vote Rubio.
Tennessee voters, pls vote Cruz.
Texas voters, pls vote Cruz.
Vermont voters, pls vote Kasich.
Virginia voters, pls vote Rubio.
Oklahoma voters, pls now it is better to vote Cruz.
Georgia voters , pls now it is better to vote Cruz.
Massachusetts voters, pls now it is better to vote Rubio.
Colorado voters, pls now it is better to vote Carson.
Michigan, pls vote Rubio,
Kentucky, pls vote Rubio,
Illinois, pls vote Rubio,
Ohio, pls vote Kasich,

Just if you are not aware let me inform you why Trump is not an eligible GOP candidate:

Trump is right now being sued in Courts of California, New york, and Florida for different scam schemes.

The last one of his scamming operations was to charge millions of dollars to students of low income for seminars offered through a University that never got any official approval to operate in California and in New York.

Pls read:

He is a candidate that is going to cause the first split of the Republican Party in probably the last hundred years thanks to his anti Christian policies.

The reason for which Trump hates Mexico is because he is already accused in that country as the agent of a giant scamming operation about a Baja Resort that was never built but for which he collected millions from naïve investors in San Diego and in Los Angeles.

Trump was also sued in Florida due to another fraudulent project in Real state that was going to be build in Tampa.

The racism and xenophobic agenda that Trump is pushing against, well known against minorities like the Hispanic Americans and the Muslim Americans, does not know limits, he is also against the African Americans as incidents in his last raids show.


The Angel of Lightness

edit on 3/1/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 05:56 PM
a reply to: The angel of light

Thank you for doing what you are doing. Trump is a modern day Nazi. He MUST be stopped at all cost. A very dangerous man indeed. I fear him. And I don't say that lightly either. USA please wake up before you send the world to hell in a handbasket. I do not recognise Trump and don't want his finger on the nuclear button thank you.

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 06:06 PM
a reply to: Wirral Bagpuss
Dear Wirral Bagpuss,

It is my pleasure, I know many voters were extremely confused to pick up candidate, and without any guidance to follow to do something productive to change the direction of this election today.

I received many communications along the last week of people really disparate with the cloudy horizon Trump is projecting for the country, they felt extremely disappointed and frustrated with the situation.

The good news is that if the people vote favoring the strongest rival of Trump in each state there is still Hope that we can stop his advance in a meaningful way.


The Angel of Lightness

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 06:08 PM
Dear Readers,

If you are Republican and located in any of the following states :

Alabama, Tennessee , Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas , Minnesota.

Please continue voting, and don't focus your attention on the first results of the east coast, that the media is starting to report in an hour or so.

Trump propaganda machinery in the Media has prepared a huge misinformation operation to discourage voters in the center of the country to vote against their candidate.

Tv News are not reliable source of information to decide voting, Trump has moved all his influence to create a mirage of projections of the voting to hypnotize voters.

Please pick the candidate that has more option to beat Trump in your state, from the list already provided in this thread hours ago.

Now if you are in Colorado or Alaska remember that you have hours ahead right now to vote, but try to move the sooner the best to vote and pickup the candidates that are stronger in your states against Trump.

With determination we can defend the integrity of the GOP from the controlling power of Trump money.


The Angel of Lightness

posted on Mar, 1 2016 @ 11:00 PM

originally posted by: The angel of light

There are then no hopes that we can avoid to sink in WWIII?

I feel there is hope and it remains in the decision of the people to look of options, look for other political alternatives:

The thread is opened to the members interested in to continue exploring all the implications in geopolitics that the decision the American people will take in November will carry out not only for the country but for the world.

Please remain in the topic, that is not the general election but the international policies of the candidates, and feel free to reply but respecting the codes of decorum in the communication.

WW3 is almost inevitable, the question is how big it will be. Will it be only regional nuclear war with agreement of world powers to stop after that and agree on new world order. Or will it be all out war with wiping off entire countries.

Trump is the least who would stop that. Hilary seems more peaceful except for Ukraine.

Now we know, it is those two candidates who will fight for presidency.

Perhaps Hilary wouldn't shoot first at Russia, while Trump could.

If Trump has advantage over Hilary, it is on the immigration issue. Because it turned to be worldwide issue, not only the Latinos thru Texas that Trump wants to stop. See what happens with Europe as we speak! Those people are not only from Syria war, they are from Nigeria, Lybia, Afghanistan. 3000 of them confirmed jihadists by Europol already inside Europe. The approach of Trump is better. But that is may be his only advantage.

In terms of dialogue with Russia and China, I don't see Trump doing breakthrough miracles, unless his preelection rhetoric remains a such and he changes face once he is elected. Bush however proved that simply doesn't happen. No matter the level of personal relations between him and Putin, he barely escaped WW3 during the Georgian crisis , with nuclear ships sent to Black sea and then Russian - to the Caribbean.

Hilary on the other side will continue what she already did during Obama admin. But we know she supported the protesters against Putin in Moscow, as well as Kiev. May be a reset button again? I don't see Hilary as the one who would push a nuclear button first. But that is not the only way to enter the war. Russia surrounded by countries like Turkey may be enough for WW3 to start. Will Hilary support that? If Hilary once elected, let to themselves countries like Turkey, if they wanna fight Russia let them fight alone, then may be there is a chance for peaceful outcome and smooth transition to a new world order dominated not by one only country but several major powers. If Hilary wants that, let use the soviet word Pluralism, then she might be the president who guarantees America won't turn into radioactive ash, as one Russian TV program warned. Moreover, Hilary said she would dig into the bottom of Area 51.

Hope all that won't remain words only, as it was the case with Obama's failed two terms presidency, very promising at the beginning and even awarded Nobel Peace Prize for nothing done.

America could survive in 21st century but only as one of the several major power hubs. If it pretends for uniqueness (as everyone could) and that pretense is paved with actions on the ground as we saw in Lybia, then the days of America are already numbered. It may not be Putin (that has been demonized by MSM), it may be North Korean satellite to EMP the great .... America must understand the rest of 96% of world population are not quite happy with the fact they are run unintelligently, and many of them starve as a result. Even developed countries suffer by the current world order. A new world order is needed asap, but not the conspiracy one,r ather a new dealing between the most influential countries, with new technology introduced, and elimination of world hunger and most common curable diseases. Then you wouldn't have the phenomenon of migrating nations to the North, that frankly is not the earth paradise.

Is that Hilary to help doing that together with Putin, Francis, Dilma Rouseff and Xi? If the answer is yes, they'd rather do it faster. Superweapons that could blind AEGIS destroyer are already demonstrated to work. The world cannot afford 10 more years in the limbo that it fell after Year 2000 with hell on earth instead of bright future. If Hilary is elected she must start doing that from Day 1. Unlike Obama who failed in every one of his endless promises. Health Care being the first failure. You know what I mean if you pay American healthcare. The least developed country you will find a doctor to examine you for 2-5 $ not in America the most developed country in the world where they rip off your skin for elemental medical examination and the needed prescription for a simple antibiotic, that you would get free of prescription for pocket money in any drug store in China. Shame!

Instead of such medicare, the most advanced country USA should be a model of introducing new medications and methods to even prolong human life, as president Clinton announced together with several scientific teams in Year 2000 that theoretically that is possible. Not oil wars, but new fuel that is not oil dependent should be introduced immediately. Such is already discovered, and it is not only one discovery. Yes the oil cartels wills suffer...Better they than the rest of us, damn it! Will that be done by Trump equally, if it is already said his helicopter has been spotted with a UFO behind? CIA already admitted half of all UFOs are THEIRS. Whose are the other half? I don't want to sound as if Trump is completely incompetent on all that. He might be even more than we imagine now. But he didn't say it as Hilary did, at least once.

For everyone who follows geopolitics on a level little higher than CNN, understands the world is not only on the brink. It has been already postponed several times in the last decade as miracles. Georgia and Ukraine the last examples before Syria. New bold changes are required regardless of the inhabitant of White House. Kremlin showed many times it is ready to go to new world order mutually acceptable. Two last popes said that either. What more is being waited for? The nukes or what? The Second Coming, or what? Even Obama in his last months can finally collaborate with the rest of leaders, if he forgets for a while his exceptional status being born in America by dice of fate. No one is exceptional and we all are born on earth by choice of someone hi above us. It is easy to destroy America, be it from inside as president or from outside with WW3. It is hard to learn to live together. Could we? Prophets said, almost impossible but not completely impossible.

P.S. the new world order and ET disclosure are not prerequisites of any antichrist, as we know there were many and different world orders in history and quite many people who fit that role as well. UFOs were being reported all over history too, including in the Bible. To claim that any betterment of humanity IS the last kingdom of antichrist, is immature. Then let go back to the African huts and be glad we have the daily food! The religious must declare it loudly, and here is may be the main cause of the problem: that in its 2000 Christendom and 5000 post flood history, the world didn't realize that to make the poor -happy is not against "gods", off-world lords, or God of the Bible.
edit on 2-3-2016 by 2012newstart because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 01:11 AM
I don't remember what I wrote but I'm sure it wasn't entirely off subject. No wait it was. Was something about how bad your English is.

Hillary will win. Trump might win but it doesn't matter. Mitch McConnell would rather vote for Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump.

Post Script: what is "The Light"?

posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 02:18 AM
a reply to: GokuVsSuperman0

I guess you address the Angel of Light, however my English is not that much better or worse than his, so I take it personally.
You know one of the biggest faults of the Americans are they consider themselves exceptional. In everything. Including by their speaking of only one language not exactly according to the grammar. The exceptional theory of world hegemony was presented by president Obama on international forum, only to draw the criticism of Putin afterwards.

Whether Hilary will win, or Trump, is something yet to be seen. Both have advantages and shortcomings, as every human being does. Bot are not gods.

America must realize its responsibilities coming from the fact it holds the biggest reserve currency and second largest nuclear arsenal, along with only few other advantages.
Listen to Robert McNamara who speaks excellent English unlike many of those 300 mln people whose fate is being decided those weeks.

Personally, I think that if Trump is elected, the world stands no chance to avoid a mega war, but will rush into one of the many nuclear scenarios. Hilary may still bring back the good old time of president Clinton's saxophone if nothing else, and approach more feminist the world affairs, than the macho style of Bush who barely escaped to be nuked after Georgia. But MSM don't talk of that do they. Trump seems to show even more bravado than Bush. It wouldn't end well in a world with 10 or more nuclear states, some of which quite angry at America for their own reasons (not exactly Russia or China). Perhaps Trump would be a good 19th century to win a war with Mexico. Will Hilary bring anything better to world scene, or we wills ee repetition of Obama and Bill? Only time will tell. IF WE HAVE IT.
edit on 2-3-2016 by 2012newstart because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 04:31 PM
ive heard that clintons history isnt very good. am i right?

posted on Mar, 2 2016 @ 04:33 PM
will miss obama when he leaves office wont be the same, cant believe trump is no.1 at the moment how can people think that that man can be told americas greatest secrets and control the worlds most powerful country huh

posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 10:19 AM

originally posted by: toppizza17
ive heard that clintons history isnt very good. am i right?

Well, she began her career in 1968 working in the Nixon's youths , supposevely in a special branch that were working to prevent a democratic fraud against her beloved candidate, so you can imagine !

The angel of Lightness

posted on Mar, 5 2016 @ 11:21 AM

originally posted by: rigel4
a reply to: The angel of light

Doesn't really matter.. their only puppets
for higher powers!

WWIII is only to scare the people ...

I'm over it ..

That is exactly the comment I had in mind when I did read the thread title.. When do americans wake tf up?

It doesn't matter if it is hillary, trump or who ever ... The two party system is for having control and the potus will be just the front man. Rep or democrat, the agenda will be the same... It is hard to accept that a country like the USA is invested with corruption but hey... what can I do about it as a foreigner other than to tell americans about it.

US citizens...and the rest of the population on this planet.. should really start to worry when Obama will "reign" a third term..(for some reason).

edit on 5/3/2016 by zatara because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 8 2016 @ 12:28 PM
a reply to: zatara

I respectfull disagree,

The current international situation would not be the same under each one of the different potential Presidents, lets analyze the distinct possible scenarios:

1) If Hillary Clinton become elected we can expect for the following 4 years the continuation of an extremely risky and dangerous tense relationship with Russia. It is not that the relationship is bad because Russia is trying to expand its sphere of influence toward the world, the real issue is that America and Europe have backed a coup d'état and a civil war because they want to expand their influence on a region that never along the entire History has been part of it: Ukraine.

We can't expect that Russia is going to accept nuclear missiles of the NATO in a country that is next to it, in the same way that in 1962 President JFK refrained absolutely the possibility that the USSR install their missiles in Cuba. The sole idea is also a violation of international agreements under which the dissolution of the USSR took place.

In 1989 Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev accepted fall of all the Communist regimes of Central Europe and the Balcans provided that none of the new goverments would ever be part of any millitary alliance with NATO. In 1991 the Russian Leader Boris Yeltsin accepted the independence of 14 republics that were formerly part of the USSR conditioned that none might ever part of Nato. These agreements were violated by the west when the Baltic countries were added to the NATO.

Mrs Clinton has damaged the confidence of the Arab allies to the US , with her support of revolutions in Egypt, Lybia, Tunisia.

2) If Bernie Sanders become electedwe can expect a relaxation of the tension we have had with Russia, since he has no interest to continue trying to pull Ukraine to the west. Senator Sanders wants a constructive and collaborative relationship with Europe and also with Russia in mutually respectful terms. He also has a different approach about migratory reform, he believes that it is not the priority in this moment to launch witches hunting against any segment of the population, including of course the Hispanic immigrants. He is going to respect the agreements done by Obama with Cuba. Now I don't think Sanders is going to continue the line showed by all the administrations since Reagan to continue basing US economy on the Global Trade, we can expect a return of protectionist policies under his rule. This is quite interesting since this can open the possibility for reindustrialization of America, that is the real solution to the lack of jobs we have now. Only with a recovery of our national internal market for our own products, manufactured in America and not all imported from far east, we are going to see the necessary social change everybody is expecting. Globalization has reached a point in which all the money is being sucked right now in only one direction: China, so it is no longer a model that is beneficial for America, if money flow away instead to remain here we are never going to recover a decent level of life for the low and middle class in the US, that are the base of the market demand.

3) If Donald Trump becomes elected, independently of what ever he decided to do with respect to Ukraine we can expect two huge negative outcomes to come to America: a complete collapse of our trade in the continent to Hispanic countries and an isolation with respect to the Muslim world. First, we are going to risk to suffer a continental commercial embargo, since the Latin American countries don't want to have any deal with a politician that has pushed a so aggressive agenda against Hispanic people in America. Now, that is not all, we also can expect to have probably the increase of the sphere of influence of ISIS in the middle east, since Trump has also attacked in his campaign the entire Muslims due to the terrorism, what in the long run will push all of them to support our enemies.

4) If Senator Ted Cruz becomes elected we can expect the return to a really tense relationship with Cuba, he is not going to tolerate the Castro regime, being the descendent of Cuban exiles, and it is likely that Cuba will then turn again toward Russia and China influence. It is likely that the relationship with Europe be the same and He will only want to improve the relationship with Russia if he can uses that card to press over La Havana. He is going by sure to maintain the Global trade as axis of the US economy, as well as a huge increase in the public debt, due to his Tax cuts offers, so dollar will weak more with him than with anybody else in power. With Latin America the relationship will be better than with Trump, but not ideal since he is strongly compromised with the Evangelists who oppose migratory reform. His closeness to Israel may damage our ties with the Muslim world. .

5) If Senator Marco Rubio is elected the situation with respect to Cuba will be the same than with Cruz in Power, but with Latin America probably the relationship will be the best, since Rubio wants to push a very generous migratory reform in the US. With Europe he is going to be the same than Cruz, cautiously discrete in handling differences, especially the support to La Havana, but with strong ties in other areas. With Russia is much aggressive than Cruz, almost as bad as Clinton. He supports the global economy but inside the continent, he is very against tolerate Chinese control on the markets.

Why is so important the relationship with Russia and Latin America?

Well, for various reasons, one is that they are natural providers of raw materials and energetics that can replace easily our dependence with respect to the Arab world, and second since there are so many conflicts in middle east that we can't win alone.

We can't have a tense or bad relationship with Mexico since that country is right now collaborating with us in to maintain strict control over the arrival of foreigners there, for controlling terrorist risks.
We share a so long border that must be patrolled and controlled by both countries in order to prevent being used by terrorists trying to enter to the US, but in addition only a collaborative Mexican migration authorities can stop the entrance of criminals to their territory through their so extensive two coasts and their borders with Guatemala or Belize.

Without Russian help is extremely difficult to be able to smash ISIS, we need to understand that if the US has right now control over Iraq, we can't expect that Russia is going to give up us Syria. Without Russian pressure ISIS can break easily the resistance of relatively small countries to the north of their positions in their way to try to attack Europe: Armenia, Georgia, or Greece. Turkey is not strongly enough to stop alone ISIS to the north.

There is another potential issue in which Russian mediation is vital: North Korea, that is a country that has been several times underestimated in the west. North Korea represents right now a huge risk to the stability of all the Far East. This is a nation that has real Nuclear power to attack and even invade South Korea, Japan and even Taiwan. Russian diplomacy proven to be the only way to negotiate our differences with Iran, so can be in Korea.


The Angel of Lightness

edit on 3/8/2016 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in