It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Mayan Calendar Ends On June 2nd, 2016 (Gregorian) or May 20th, 2016 (Julian)

page: 2
26
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate Well, my suggestion is, instead of arguing before you post your research, let the facts you have discovered be your argument against the folks not believing what your claiming, after you state your findings.
This thread is going nowhere fast and all you need to is post your findings.


edit on 17-2-2016 by peppycat because: ughhh!




posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

You're the only troll in your own thread. Why wouldn't you just show your "proof" in your OP?



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

Of course none of us can disprove it, because you have not presented us with anything to disprove.
Did you get suspended from school recently, and decide to troll the internets??? There are other boards for that.


If you reply with anything other than your research, please go an hero yourself.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: neutrinostargate
Defensive. When they think they're losing they start getting aggressive. Will be studying your behavior through your comments. My prediction. You're full of it and are contributing nothing of substance to ATS...But hey, if we get a laugh out of it, or if I do, then go for it, but are you sure you'll want to stay? I like reading interesting topics, but not those of no value of truth.


Not defensive.
Get ready to read an interesting topic, that is if you want to.
edit on 17-2-2016 by neutrinostargate because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:50 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate
I'm getting ready to read, a possibly interesting, but a completely fabricated topic.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:50 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

I have a calendar printed in China from back in 2011. It definitely has no date after 2012. Therefore, that was (obviously) the end of the world.

No more argument.




posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Atsbhct
Failed attempt at creating hype?



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: neutrinostargate

You're the only troll in your own thread. Why wouldn't you just show your "proof" in your OP?


Here is this for now. More to come.

The Gregorian calendar or Gregorian solar year of 365.2425 days/year doesn’t even accurately match a precessional cycle too! The 5128 years of the true Mayan Haab Solar Year of 365 days using 1,872,000 days for the 13 baktuns, (144,0000 days each), perfectly matches the correct processional cycle of 1 degree change every 71.233 years. This is computed by taking 5200 years - 5128.767 = 71.333 years per 1 degree.

This was stated about the degrees and precessional accuracy:

"There are 360 degrees in the Zodiac circle. It takes ~72 years of new spring dawns to move the constellation but 1 degree. For reference, the moon takes up ½ of a degree. The span of the Zodiac signs average 30º. It would take ~2,160 years to travel through one Zodiac sign (72 yr x 30º). Over one lifetime this movement would not be noticed. It would take a number of lifetimes to notice this and then have accurate enough records to forecast the future movements. A longer explanation is on my web site at At 72 years per degree, it would take 25,920 years to complete the entire cycle and return.

In western science the discovery of Precession is credited to Hipparchus around 120 BC. He was an excellent astronomer but likely used older data from the Babylonians and perhaps other sources from the library at Alexandria. How accurate was he? Modern science puts the most accurate number to transit the 1 degree not at 72 years but at 71.63 years. Hipparchus figures estimated it at 78.26 years. Close. Ptolemy then used Hipparchus information and 300 years later estimated it to be at ~100 years. Not getting better. The Mayans at about 50 BC, or so, developed their calendar and with its accuracy estimated it at 71.2 years. How did they get it so accurate? Did they have past help and information? If we assume modern estimates are 100% accurate, then the Mayans were 99.4% accurate, Hipparchus was 91.5% accurate and Ptolemy was 71.6% accurate. So it is shown the Mayans were more accurate and earlier than the west . . . or they had help."


www.eearthk.com...

The 5128 years of the true Mayan Haab Solar Year of 365 days using 1,872,000 days for the 13 baktuns, (144,0000 days each), perfectly matches the correct processional cycle of 1 degree change every 71.233 years. Again, this is computed by taking 5200 years - 5128.767 = 71.333 years.
And this is how the Mayans figured out precession. They used a 13 baktun cycle of 144,000 days each (or 1,872,000 days total) with a solar year of 365 days. This equates to 5128.767 years. There is 26,000 years in a grand precessional cycle. 26,000 years would be a circle just like 360 degrees. 5200 years x 5 = 26,000 years. What the Mayans did was they took 5200 years subtracted it by 5128.767 years and got to 71.233 years per 1 degree. 360 degrees x 71.233 years per 1 degree = 25,644 years for a full precessional cycle.

Lets say it was the Gregorian year to figure out precession. 1,872,000 days/365.2425 solar year days = 5125.361 years

5200 years minus 5125.361 years = 74.636 years per 1 degree = 74.636 years x 360 degrees = 26,870 years which is not even remotely close to the proposed years for precession which is generally around 25,600 years many people consider. And 74.63 years per 1 degree isn’t even close to the generally accepted estimate of 72 year per degree for precession!

So we can see, the Gregorian calendar is clearly wrong when dealing with time.

Again, why would Mayan researchers use a faulty Gregorian calendar of 365.2425 solar day per year and not use the Mayan Haab 365 solar days per year? It is taking a faulty Western calendar solar year calculation derived by the Pope back in 1582 and using it with the Mayan calendar cycles. To me, why Mayan researchers didn’t use 365 days to arrive at the correct date of the Mayan Long Count is extremely perplexing to say the least.

Also, 71.233 years per 1 degree x 73 = 5200. Or a pressional cycle of 26,00 - 25,644 years = 356 year difference. Take 26,000/71.2333 26,000 years! It is perfect!

As mentioned above, 71.233 years per 1 degree x 73 = 5200. But why the number 73? The number 73 was very important to the Mayans.

“Mayan-Aztec Calendar cycles: The Sheaf & the Century
As one can see then from the above, the key time cycle of interest, the Earth-Venus Synodic interval, is equal to about 583.92021140 days. That the Mayan people and also the Aztecs were interested in accurately tracking the successive passage of such conjunctions is beyond doubt. Their method, as will be examined, is indeed somewhat ingenious.

Right up until the arrival of the Spanish in the New world in the late 15th century, there was a time cycle actively tracked by the Indian people of Central America, from very ancient times. Indeed, the time cycle in question is so old that the exact moment of its inception as an astronomical cycle, to be first recorded by the people of this region, is unknown. The actual name given to it is the Sheaf.
The Sheaf, as a time interval, is generated by carefully combining a calendar year of 365 days, with the Tzolkin ‘forward advance of Venus measure’ of 260 days. When each of these measures are evaluated, it is so determined that the lowest common multiple (LCM) associated with them i.e. the lowest number that they will each divide into without a remainder, is 18980 days. Thus, after exactly 1 Sheaf of 18980 days, both time intervals would re-synchronise, just as for example, a LCM planetary conjunction cycle would. This fact is evident in the following relations:

365 / 260 = 73 / 52

The fraction so generated here of 73 / 52 is the smallest fraction that the Year & Tzolkin can be reduced to. It is also the case that they are the numbers via which one reveals the LCM between the two cycles:

365 x 52 = 18980 days
260 x 73 = 18980 days

As one can see then, after exactly 52 calendar years, 73 completed periods of the forward advance of Venus will have occurred, which will be the starting point for a new (Sheaf) round.”

www.ancient-world-mysteries.com...



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

You have a small brain inside your brain, called a reptilian brain.. That little part has gone into a state called flight or fight, so it makes you imagine things, which really isnt logic..



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: neutrinostargate
I'm getting ready to read, a possibly interesting, but a completely fabricated topic.


Fabricated? LOL Why would it be fabricated? Ever think the 12/21/12 date was fabricated because of an inaccurate calendar?



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

I don't remember "research" being copied and pasted quotes from other websites.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

Insulting members isnt a great way to stress your point. Being relatively new, your off to a bad start. It actually detracts from your credibility here-now and further postings down the road.

Respectfully speaking (at least that is my stated intent), the other half of a brain is yours. It was your insult. Put the two together friend? And you MIGHT equal one complete prediction.

Even then...and like the rest...your's will only go away without coming to pass.

Best

MS



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate
I don't believe in any predicted apocalypse...



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   
And why the one day change from your last thread on the exact same topic? www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: neutrinostargate

Insulting members isnt a great way to stress your point. Being relatively new, your off to a bad start. It actually detracts from your credibility here-now and further postings down the road.

Respectfully speaking (at least that is my stated intent), the other half of a brain is yours. It was your insult. Put the two together friend? And you MIGHT equal one complete prediction.

Even then...and like the rest...your's will only go away without coming to pass.

Best

MS


So do you not want me to post any further of my research?
If nobody cares, and wants to insult the topic, then I will go and not post anything further.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   
It seems the invention of the internet, opening the world of possibilities, has enabled some very peculiar results.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   
Actually this should have happened in 2012, dont you just hate the lag?



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Atsbhct
A comment of his from that post AND this one:
1.But I bet you can't even remotely try to disprove my theory.
2.I bet you can't even remotely disprove it at all. LOL

Even his comments or unoriginal. Note those are both fragments.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: neutrinostargate

It was interesting you posted not in the Predications and Prophecy forum specific to this "topic"...but in Skunk Works, basically a reference to UFO's and secret designs and structures.

Sir: think about it. That alone gives you a minus-1 for your perceptions, and lends even less credibility if you want to be taken seriously.



posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
So for giggles I went to your website, which is basically a buy my book BS site. sorry bud but you might want to find another topic the Mayan gravy train left 4 years ago. Oh and BTW that is against ATS T&C policy



new topics




 
26
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join