It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bill O'Reilly likes Bill Clinton for U.N. chief

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 08:18 AM
link   
"Bill O'Reilly, host of the highest-rated program on No. 1 Fox News Channel, last night endorsed Bill Clinton to replace Kofi Annan as secretary-general of the United Nations."

NWO Trial Balloon

When I heard this I almost fell out of my chair. If this happens under GW I will have to join all the Bush haters on this board. Say it ain't so "dubya".




posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 08:44 AM
link   
Wow. For once a actually agree with Bill O'Reiley. I also think Clinton would be an excellent choice for the job.

With the way he has shown the world that he is ready to unite and help with the tsunami disaster (thank you George W. for the assist!), he has added even more world admiration to his resume. Clinton would be the most charismatic UN chief in it's history.

On another note, this leads me to believe that the NWO really is right around the corner.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 08:56 AM
link   
Clinton would be a good PR guy, but he's not going to be assigned to the UN. Bush can't have someone so obviously ideologically opposed to him in a position like that. No more than Clinton could've had Regan in the UN, or like Nixon having Carter there. Imagine?



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:01 AM
link   
I agree with you Nygdan, it will probably never happen but I also think he would do a good job. Whether you like him or not, he was one of the best public speakers that we have had as a president.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nygdan
Clinton would be a good PR guy, but he's not going to be assigned to the UN. Bush can't have someone so obviously ideologically opposed to him in a position like that. No more than Clinton could've had Regan in the UN, or like Nixon having Carter there. Imagine?



I respectfully disagree. If you look at it from the aspect of the bringing about of a New World Order, I feel that they all have the same agenda.

Again, look at the tsunami incident for example. Bush Jr. and Bush Sr. buth know full and well of Clinton's intentions to grasp the power role at the U.N. Can you really believe they would have put Clinton's face in the worlds spotlight if they didn't want him in? That's free publicity from the most powerful man on earth!

Oh what a tangled web they weave.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:05 AM
link   
GO CLINTON!

I love the guy and think it would be a good balancing of power to have him in the position while GB is President. I think Clinton could improve how the UN is percieved throughout the world. He couldnt really screw it up any more than it already is.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:10 AM
link   
I think the UN could do with some proper leadership, Clinton seems as though he's up to the job...... unless Bush gets there first



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by UK Wizard
...... unless Bush gets there first


Man! Dont scare me like that!



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 09:36 AM
link   
Bill Clinton COULD have done the job ... but honestly, when
I look at him now, I feel for the guy. His heart surgery has
taken A LOT out of him. He looks old. His hair is thinning
a lot and it is now white instead of that nice gray that it was.
He looks and acts very tired. I don't think he is up for the job,
although a few years ago he could have done it.

I believe the rules at the UN say that no country leader or
former country leader is allowed to run the UN. So those
who want Clinton (or any US president) are dreaming.
It's against UN law. (not that being against UN law has
ever stopped the UN from doing illegal things, has it?)

Good things w/ Clinton - the world likes him. He might be
able to get things done.

Bad things w/ Clinton - He would get confused and think
he was head of America and of the entire world. Also - Hillary
would be really in charge of him which would mean that she'd think
SHE was in charge of America and the world. FRIGHTENING.

REALLY - just pull the plug on the U.N. It's corrupt to the core.
It's a cesspool of inadequacy, corruption, incompetence and
eurocentric anti-Americanism. The UN 'refugee camps' are
nothing more than a mass mosh pit for child molesters,
pornographers, and child prostitution rings. Dump the UN.
It can't be fixed.



[edit on 1/10/2005 by FlyersFan]



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 10:06 AM
link   
Well Clinton is a wonderful public speaker. He's also a good people person, which is pretty important in a UN post, isn't it?

I don't remember a leader who was able to convince people that he was one of them as well as Clinton did (see "I feel your pain"). He was excellent at connecting with the citizen.

He was quite good in the foreign relations area and was very popular in many countries overseas.

Clinton would actually be a very good candidate for this. The fact that O' Reilly says so makes me think maybe he developed some sort of new liking for Clinton since his latest troubles.

Either way it's no revelation to me that Clinton would be good for the post, just who suggested it.



Hey, If Hillary wins in 08 and Bill is SecGen... damn that's crazy.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 10:40 AM
link   
There is nothing we can do to prevent the New World Order. With that being said, I would much rather have Bill Clinton as the head of the UN and Hillary Clinton as president in 2008.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 10:48 AM
link   
But Bill O'Reilly likes him for the job?

O'Reilly probably just misses bashing him!

Clinton might do a good job....at least as good as anyone has done lately... but, there's no telling what kind of conspriracy theories it would spark!



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 10:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by skychief
he was one of the best public speakers that we have had as a president.

Meh. Regan was a better one I should think. And bush, while he is a jibbering idiot at times, well, people really emphasize with that and it communicates well. Clinton was a good speaker, to be sure. I think the big benefit might be that it would be seen as a concession to the 'world', sort of like 'see, we're willing to compromise, here is someone you like in your forum'.


it would be a good balancing of power to have him in the position while GB is President

Thats just it tho, the ambasador to the UN is not supposed to 'balance' any presidency, its a tool of the presidency and congress there to promulgate its policy. Tho, having an american as head of the UN would probably be worth any clashes between Clinton and the gov.


believe the rules at the UN say that no country leader or
former country leader is allowed to run the UN

But he was impeached, so he can qualify! Ha, how mucked up woudl that be!



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by frayed1
But Bill O'Reilly likes him for the job?


Ok I do agree that O'Reilly is a scum armchair politician. And yes don’t forget a sexual predator. I don’t agree with him. I agree with Clinton being in the UN.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Simulacra
Ok I do agree that O'Reilly is a scum armchair politician. And yes don’t forget a sexual predator. I don’t agree with him. I agree with Clinton being in the UN.


Where's the proof of O'Reilly being a sexual predator? We only have some unsubstantiated accusations from a disgruntled employee. On the other hand, we have DNA evidence proving that Bill Clinton certainly is a sexual predator.

Yeah, Bill Clinton is just the guy to clean up the scandals plaguing the UN. He surely didn't have any scandals when he was in the White House!


[edit on 1/10/2005 by djohnsto77]



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 11:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Simulacra
Ok I do agree that O'Reilly is a scum armchair politician. And yes don’t forget a sexual predator. I don’t agree with him. I agree with Clinton being in the UN.



and Clinton isn't a womanizer with awful taste in the female form? Imagine all the international interns who would learn of one more use for a nice esplendido.

I agree that Clintont would be a nice choice. With Hillary telling him what to do, we'd keep the financial scandals where they belong. On American soil.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Hell yeah, why not. Stick that Rhodes scholar, CFR member and Trilateralist into the thrown of the One World Government, let him reign again, accept he controls the majority of the world this time.

Dear God help us, we are done for. We are in a downward spiral, a plot that is beyond our understanding is unfolding before our eyes... Could you Imagine, Hilary in '08, and Bill in the seat of UN secertary general? Holy #, that seriously scares me...



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 11:45 AM
link   
The only chair I would ever want to see a clinton in again is the electric chair. Those of you that like him tend to completelly ignore the fact that to gain a 2nd term he sold freaking secrets to the chinese!!! Him and his rat traitor wife should burn.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by astral_ice
The only chair I would ever want to see a clinton in again is the electric chair. Those of you that like him tend to completelly ignore the fact that to gain a 2nd term he sold freaking secrets to the chinese!!! Him and his rat traitor wife should burn.


don't hold back. tell us how you really feel.



posted on Jan, 10 2005 @ 12:00 PM
link   
not a bad idea...not a huge Clinton fan....but in that position...i think he'd fit fine...



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join