It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The war on cash continues: Bilderberger Larry Summers wants to "kill" $100s and $50s.

page: 5
33
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2016 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

This ties in with the whole assertion that the elites want to get rid of currency, chip us all, and if you disobey or dissent, they deactivate your chip and you can't buy anything. Whoever controls the money supply controls EVERYTHING.




posted on Feb, 20 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   
Do this kind of thing and combine it with negative interest rates, and the banks really get to screw over everyone.



posted on Feb, 20 2016 @ 03:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t

What is "wrong" with having 100's?
Like there is something inherently "wrong"with a larger bill?

Or do you perhaps mean "as opposed to"?
Really two entirely different questions.

Hopefully you do not mean "wrong" as in "morally wrong"?








I don't really care one way or the other. That was my point. If we have them, cool. If not. Oh well.



You should care. This goes beyond the simplicity of having 1 bill vs five 20s.

This has to do with personal privacy and consumer choice.

I for one do not buy into the sky is falling and Indo not think anything will come of this, but you have to realize that if something of this nature were to happen, it indeed has a sinister agenda. It's all about control.

A majority of Americans are already plugged in 24 hrs a day with the ability of being physically tracked via our Mobil devices. It has to stop somewhere.
edit on 20-2-2016 by spinalremain because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2016 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
Elimination of paper currency will give the governments and bankers total power over the working classes.

They will take upon themselves to make sure you pay your dues first and feed yourself second.

That is the wet dream of every government and bankers in the word.


Absolutely!

Also the ability to verify every single transaction one makes, and removing any sense of anonymity and privacy equates to the police state wet dream. It has monumental ramifications.



posted on Feb, 23 2016 @ 11:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I don't really care one way or the other. That was my point. If we have them, cool. If not. Oh well.


My answer was rhetorical, I should have made it more obvious.

I don't care if you care.

Yes, a cashless society is part of the agenda, though I think a socialist
agenda will precede that, hard to take from someone what one cant find.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 12:17 AM
link   
I still prefer debt cards and cash on hand.
I do hope this seriously never gets to see the light of day.
edit on 24-2-2016 by TaleDawn because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
Hmm I read this article not too long ago now, but it appears the war on cash has been going on for a long time now...

www.caseyresearch.com...

The fulfillment of Revelation 13:16-18 is coming I do believe...



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

Yes, a cashless society is part of the agenda, though I think a socialist
agenda will precede that, hard to take from someone what one cant find.


Really? Because a socialist agenda would be great. The masses would finally be treated with respect and money wouldn't constantly be funneled to the select few.

Oh wait, you are actually afraid of this. Oh well, have fun waking up in cold sweats over other people being happy they can afford to live finally.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 06:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: spinalremain
I for one do not buy into the sky is falling and Indo not think anything will come of this, but you have to realize that if something of this nature were to happen, it indeed has a sinister agenda. It's all about control.


I don't have to realize anything. I don't assume things without evidence, and I have HIGH standards of evidence so I don't buy into every little conspiracy that crosses my path.



posted on Feb, 24 2016 @ 04:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Really? Because a socialist agenda would be great.



Show me.

I'll be waiting for the Utopian example.



The masses would finally be treated with respect and money wouldn't constantly be funneled to the select few.


No it would be funneled to the select masses.

Socialism is not the answer to corruption of the 1% in Washington
and Wall Street. The 1% in general is not a problem, nor those with
modest wealth.
Corruption, Ineptitude, Redundancy in Government
...that is the problem!

Those who earn it through their own honest means, there is nothing wrong with that!



Oh well, have fun waking up in cold sweats over other people being happy they can afford to live finally.


Hyperbole and a half much?

Your deluded if you imagine any Socialist Government
or Politician really cares about the people living a good life.
They will take 97% and that wont be enough. And little
of that will ever make its way to the people.

ETA: Forgot to mention Fraud in Government.
Unchecked Fraud

Its almost as if *cough cough* those Socialists *cough* in power now dont
care if there is unchecked fraud. *cough cough*
edit on 24-2-2016 by burntheships because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
33
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join