It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The interesting thing is...why are they unveiling it? Do they have a replacement? Or...?
There's no bloody honour in it otherwise, and regardless of any argument to the contrary, that is still more important than winning or being safe in my book.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: anzha
I just want to make this clear. I hate drones. I hate the use of them, I hate the look of them, I hate the shape of them, and the noise of them, and I think the only thing that is worse than a moron thinking he is billy big nuts because he can launch a missile and wreck an entire apartment complex, is a moron who can do it from a secure location on the ground and feel the same way.
There should be some physical risk to performing an assault by air. Marginal maybe, but risk all the same. There's no bloody honour in it otherwise, and regardless of any argument to the contrary, that is still more important than winning or being safe in my book.
a reply to: TrueBrit
TWould you trade every innocent in the building for those individuals? Would they trade those innocents for their lives? What kind of people would? Would you trade the lives of the people in the nearest apartment building to your house, for those men you mentioned? Would you have it done on your own soil?ext
Does that mean that the current video signal is not encrypted? I thought the military always used encryption on any communications that could be intercepted.
and had secure video transmission to provide National Security Agency (NSA) type 1 line-of-sight (LOS) encrypted video (transmission only).