It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary emails; More released; 15 percent of 551 marked classified

page: 2
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

If she has already been granted immunity (it's possible), the "conspiracies" will convict her all by themselves.





posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 04:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: HUMBLEONE




Is the Zombie Apocalypse just a metaphor for our current civilization?


Pretty much.

Their whines about rich people is akin to zombies going on about 'brainz'.


I refer to the fact that it appears that a significant cohort of the population, insist on believing the propaganda narrative. They refuse to embrace reason, critical thinking and ignore the fact that they have been bamboozled.



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert

If she has already been granted immunity (it's possible)


Who has the authority to grant her immunity from prosecution?



the "conspiracies" will convict her all by themselves.




She's already guilty in the court of Right Wing nuttery.
edit on 13-2-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert

How Immunity Works In Federal Criminal Cases



None of that would apply to Hillary unless she is going to rat someone else out.

Let me guess, you will now create a conspiracy in which Hillary will get immunity because she will snitch on someone else. Perhaps a lowly intern, or maybe even the almighty ruler of the Illuminati?



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: xuenchen


None of that would apply to Hillary unless she is going to rat someone else out.

Let me guess, you will now create a conspiracy in which Hillary will get immunity because she will snitch on someone else. Perhaps a lowly intern, or maybe even the almighty ruler of the Illuminati?


Or her own people like Huma and/or Cheryl.

Or, give up the names of private or foreign interests and/or individuals like Sid Blumenthal for example.

There's plenty of censored info to support just about anything.




edit on Feb-13-2016 by xuenchen because: Soros



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert

If she has already been granted immunity (it's possible)


Who has the authority to grant her immunity from prosecution?



the "conspiracies" will convict her all by themselves.




She's already guilty in the court of Right Wing nuttery.


Or you could say she is completely innocent in the court of left wing nuttery. Which one is more likely with a woman who has been the instigator of more scandals than you could write a book about Titled "WhiteWash"?



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: HUMBLEONE
Kool Aid is a wonderful drink. People have been drinking it so long that its blinded them from reality.

But reality is a whole other story.






posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert


None of that would apply to Hillary unless she is going to rat someone else out. 


That is generally how you obtain immunity from prosecution.

If we knew what all might be on the 'private' emails that she decided needed deleted.... we might know if there are bigger fish than her involved.
Or is it your opinion that there are no higher authorities than the Secretary of State?



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert

If she has already been granted immunity (it's possible)


Who has the authority to grant her immunity from prosecution?



the "conspiracies" will convict her all by themselves.




She's already guilty in the court of Right Wing nuttery.


Or you could say she is completely innocent in the court of left wing nuttery. Which one is more likely with a woman who has been the instigator of more scandals than you could write a book about Titled "WhiteWash"?


She could be innocent. She could be guilty. I don't know.

I'm not going to pass judgement or come to any conclusion until we have more information to work with. Anything else is illogical.

What I definitely will not do is construct idiotic conspiracies to justify wishful thinking and personal hatred.



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert


None of that would apply to Hillary unless she is going to rat someone else out. 


That is generally how you obtain immunity from prosecution.

If we knew what all might be on the 'private' emails that she decided needed deleted.... we might know if there are bigger fish than her involved.
Or is it your opinion that there are no higher authorities than the Secretary of State?


I don't know, but I highly doubt Hillary is going to get immunity in order to fry a "bigger fish". As of now, Hillary is the biggest target there is. Focusing on her would change the course of a presidential election.



posted on Feb, 14 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Or we could say she's innocent until proven guilty. You know...the way the law is written.

Of course she has to actually be charged with something first.



posted on Feb, 14 2016 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert

How Immunity Works In Federal Criminal Cases



None of that would apply to Hillary unless she is going to rat someone else out.

Let me guess, you will now create a conspiracy in which Hillary will get immunity because she will snitch on someone else. Perhaps a lowly intern, or maybe even the almighty ruler of the Illuminati?



No, but it would apply to Huma?



posted on Feb, 14 2016 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Or we could say she's innocent until proven guilty. You know...the way the law is written.

Of course she has to actually be charged with something first.


But we all know in practice does not work that way, and all are suspected guilty until your expensive lawyer proves you innocent at trial, which usually tells you that the risk of being convicted of something you didn't do outweighs the benefit of pleading guilty to a lesser charge with all jail time removed, so you usually will just be guilty of a lesser charge.

But this doesn't apply to super criminals like Hillary with a body count that Adolf would be envy of in his adolescent years.

To defend a witch like hillary, well, at least we know who owns your soul now don't we?



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

We all know how it works. Yes.



posted on Feb, 22 2016 @ 09:18 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Is she "under investigation" like Hillary is "under investigation"?



posted on Feb, 22 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Is she "under investigation" like Hillary is "under investigation"?


We don't know who has immunity (if anybody)

There's dozens of people being "looked at".

Some have already plead the 5th and may be giving key info to the FBI.



posted on Feb, 22 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

But there is no federal criminal case. Yet in the right wing court of public opinion she's already been convicted and we're just awaiting sentencing.



posted on Feb, 22 2016 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You didn't answer the question. Because Hillary is NOT under investigation. I'm pretty sure Huma isn't either.



posted on Feb, 22 2016 @ 09:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Well if the FBI and IG investigations are ongoing, how can anyone know for sure who is involved.




new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join