EPA Goes After Low-Income Farmers In Land Grab

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Interesting topic, ElectricUniverse. This seems like obvious nefarious behavior on the part of the EPA to me. If they were really serious about punishing the pollution problem, why they wouldn't just go after the largest volume polluters and work their way down the list is beyond me.

If they really wanted to solve the problem, anaerobic digestors would do the trick. They could even have government assistance to help with the installation and equipment costs, if that would make you socialist types happy. Of course, anaerobic digestors would provide a free, carbon neutral, environmentally friendly, on site energy source for those who had the right system set up. We can't have that now, can we?

In terms of solving the problem, the EPA's approach doesn't make much sense. I guess it makes sense if you look at it as a land/power grab tactic, though.

originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Interesting topic, ElectricUniverse. This seems like obvious nefarious behavior on the part of the EPA to me. If they were really serious about punishing the pollution problem, why they wouldn't just go after the largest volume polluters and work their way down the list is beyond me.
...

Yep, if they were really interested in environmentalism they wouldn't be trying to force the environment to their will through geoengineering. They wouldn't be forcing farmers to shut down their farms, but instead helping them.

What the EPA, and the Obama administration are doing is to simply assert their claim over all lands. Environmentalism is being used as an excuse for the end goal of total State control over land and means of production.

Some people claim Obama is not a socialist... Well, this is socialism, to give the State control over all means of production and lands.