It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I just read Reuters report on the same interview of Prime Minister Medvedev only their headline read "Russia raised the spector of interminable or "world war" if Syria talks fail" whereas this article has Russia "Threatening permanant world war" There is a big difference between threatening world war and warning of the spector of a world war.
The Washington Times author and reuters both got the quotes right only where one author hears threats the other hears a warning. I re-read PM Medvedev's quotes and at no point did he threaten anything and IMHO he's right if we let this wound fester it's going to infect the region then the world. I don't really know why the American media want to inflame the situation with Russia and Syria but the last world war killed 60 million people and we've gotten WAY better at killing people since then. This time the USA won't be be spared like the the last two....weapons today have a global reach.
www.washingtontimes.com...
Just visit NATO-RUSSIA cooperation plans for this and coming up years
Russia’s new military doctrine lists NATO, US as major foreign threats
They continue to unscramble nukes and work together (maybe with a frown but that's it)
Cooperation has been suspended in response to Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, which the Allies condemn in the strongest terms. Political channels of communication remain open.
Russia was the first to do the groundwork for peace in Syria by launching its anti-IS operation, while both Washington and Brussels lacked any kind of strategy, the ex-chairman of NATO’s Military Committee has said. Trends Russian anti-terror op in Syria Lieutenant General Harald Kujat, who was chief of staff of the Bundeswehr (German armed forces) from 2000-2002 and served as NATO’s Military Committee chairman from 2002-2005, made the comments on the Syrian crisis in an interview with Passauer Neue Presse newspaper.
“The Russians have made the peace process [in Syria] possible,” he told the newspaper on Friday.
The West was at standstill until September 2015, Kujat stressed: “Neither the Americans nor the Europeans had any strategy for a peaceful Syria. Both weren’t prepared to be really involved. The Russians did it and opened a window for political solution.”
The Russian operation was crucial for the Syrian Army on the ground to survive Islamic State’s (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) offensive and prevent the entire country from being seized by Islamist militants, he said.
“I gave them several weeks [to last before being defeated]. Then Syria would have collapsed, with IS capturing the country. The next target would be Lebanon, then Israel. It could result in far-reaching consequences for all of us.”
According to Kujat, Russian air support for the Syrian Army’s operation to re-take Aleppo was essential from a military perspective.
5. Disarmament and Commitments to Reduce Arsenal Size Legal obligation to pursue global disarmament under Article VI of the NPT. [18] Under the New START treaty that entered into force on February 5, 2011, the United States and Russia agreed to reduce their deployed strategic warheads by 2018 to no more than 1,550 each; to deploy no more than 700 ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers; and to limit ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers and heavy bombers to no more than 800 (whether deployed or not). [19] U.S.-Soviet INF Treaty eliminated all ground-launched intermediate and short-range ballistic missiles and their launchers. [20] Reduced arsenal to less than 6,000 warheads and 1,600 delivery vehicles under START I. [21] Reduced strategic nuclear warheads to between 1,700 and 2,200 (counted according to treaty guidelines) under SORT by 2012. [22] The number of nonstrategic weapons is currently less than 25% of the 1991 amount. [23] As of 1 January 2010, Russia had eliminated about 1,600 ICBM and SLBM launchers, 3,100 ICBMs and SLBMs, 47 nuclear submarines, and 67 heavy bombers. [24] In May 2015, at the 2015 NPT Review Conference, the Russian Federation announced that it had reduced the number of deployed warheads to 1,582 and the number of deployed delivery vehicles to 515. [25]
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: bjarneorn
Well, I'll just say "go for it, Russia" ... whose going to miss the Saudi's? or Turks?
Really, you have no problem with a world war, and are pushing Russia to go for it...totally amazing.
originally posted by: serpentines
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
Topic is not Ukraine Russia NATO but for the sake of a conversation ok re:
(1. NATO is Europian first .. American solders second and forever will be)
(2. Soviet Union is deeply embedded in the hearts of majority of European people.. If you would be from Europe then you would know the motto: you must be crazy to want Soviet Union to rise again you would have no heart if you wanted to ever forget it)
I don't know how to say this to not offend you or look like I don't want to seek positive discussion with you
But : you never will be the voice of Europe neither do I understand why are you trying to be
‘Russians made peace possible’: Ex-NATO military committee chief praises Syria op
Suspension definition : delay or interruption not termination
Russia was the first to do the groundwork for peace in Syria by launching its anti-IS operation, while both Washington and Brussels lacked any kind of strategy, the ex-chairman of NATO’s Military Committee has said. Trends Russian anti-terror op in Syria Lieutenant General Harald Kujat, who was chief of staff of the Bundeswehr (German armed forces) from 2000-2002 and served as NATO’s Military Committee chairman from 2002-2005, made the comments on the Syrian crisis in an interview with Passauer Neue Presse newspaper.
“The Russians have made the peace process [in Syria] possible,” he told the newspaper on Friday.
The West was at standstill until September 2015, Kujat stressed: “Neither the Americans nor the Europeans had any strategy for a peaceful Syria. Both weren’t prepared to be really involved. The Russians did it and opened a window for political solution.”
The Russian operation was crucial for the Syrian Army on the ground to survive Islamic State’s (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) offensive and prevent the entire country from being seized by Islamist militants, he said.
“I gave them several weeks [to last before being defeated]. Then Syria would have collapsed, with IS capturing the country. The next target would be Lebanon, then Israel. It could result in far-reaching consequences for all of us.”
According to Kujat, Russian air support for the Syrian Army’s operation to re-take Aleppo was essential from a military perspective.
UNited States and Russia: NPT Nuclear Weapons State disarment
5. Disarmament and Commitments to Reduce Arsenal Size Legal obligation to pursue global disarmament under Article VI of the NPT. [18] Under the New START treaty that entered into force on February 5, 2011, the United States and Russia agreed to reduce their deployed strategic warheads by 2018 to no more than 1,550 each; to deploy no more than 700 ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers; and to limit ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers and heavy bombers to no more than 800 (whether deployed or not). [19] U.S.-Soviet INF Treaty eliminated all ground-launched intermediate and short-range ballistic missiles and their launchers. [20] Reduced arsenal to less than 6,000 warheads and 1,600 delivery vehicles under START I. [21] Reduced strategic nuclear warheads to between 1,700 and 2,200 (counted according to treaty guidelines) under SORT by 2012. [22] The number of nonstrategic weapons is currently less than 25% of the 1991 amount. [23] As of 1 January 2010, Russia had eliminated about 1,600 ICBM and SLBM launchers, 3,100 ICBMs and SLBMs, 47 nuclear submarines, and 67 heavy bombers. [24] In May 2015, at the 2015 NPT Review Conference, the Russian Federation announced that it had reduced the number of deployed warheads to 1,582 and the number of deployed delivery vehicles to 515. [25]
Unlike the discussion here
Both sides deal diplomaticly without conceal
Topic is not Ukraine Russia NATO but for the sake of a conversation ok re:
(1. NATO is Europian first .. American solders second and forever will be)
(2. Soviet Union is deeply embedded in the hearts of majority of European people.. If you would be from Europe then you would know the motto: you must be crazy to want Soviet Union to rise again you would have no heart if you wanted to ever forget it)
But : you never will be the voice of Europe neither do I understand why are you trying to be
‘Russians made peace possible’: Ex-NATO military committee chief praises Syria op