It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Considerably more of the fossil record of creatures such as mammoths, mastodons, camels, horses and ground sloths has been lost in what is now the continental United States and South America than in Alaska and areas near the Bering Strait. That variation complicates efforts to reconstruct the population sizes of those species across North and South America, conclude Professor Todd Surovell and graduate student Spencer Pelton in the UW Department of Anthropology.
“While bone preservation in Arctic regions is aided by cold temperatures and the presence of permafrost, considerably more bone has been lost over time in regions farther south -- in fact, at a faster rate than the sediments in which they were deposited have eroded,” Surovell says. “That means researchers must adjust for those differences as they estimate the numbers of these animals, many of which are now extinct, across the Americas.”
originally posted by: SirKonstantin
Molecules move slower at a colder temperature, thus slowing the decay process...I just don't see how this isn't common sense by now. And maybe bacteria which cause decay freeze to death...
originally posted by: SirKonstantin
...kinda of a boring topic to post on ATS...IMO.
originally posted by: Byrd
The title's awfully misleading...but once over that, it's quite interesting.
originally posted by: Astyanax
If this is proven, what implications would it have for the Mysterious Mammoth Carcass that Could Change Human History?
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: Byrd
The title's awfully misleading...but once over that, it's quite interesting.
I'm not quite sure how it's misleading? Could you explain?
originally posted by: Astyanax
If this is proven, what implications would it have for the Mysterious Mammoth Carcass that Could Change Human History?
peter vlar is correct. This discovery doesn't change our dating of finds, but rather, just which areas are more capable of maintaining fossils than others. This discovery should help us add a variable when trying to decipher the population of some species, thus making the conclusion more accurate