It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does Bernie Sanders have enough royal blood to be POTUS?

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   
I would imagine everyone on this site is aware of the Most royal candidate theory.

It looks like if you're a Trump or a Clinton fan, you're in the clear:

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton revealed to be distant cousins as family trees show they share same set of royal ancestors

Could that be why they're the leaders after all?


The following article sums up something I've never seen discussed in detail about Sanders...his race:

As Bernie Sanders Makes History, Jews Wonder What It Means

Does Bernie Sanders have enough royal blood to be POTUS?

I've spent time researching it and I can't find any information about the royal blood of Bernie Sanders. As a proponent of the Most royal candidate theory I believe that may preclude him from having a chance at the White House. History does seem to indicate that after all.

Anyone have information on the royal blood of Bernie Sanders?

As a side note, Sanders seems to be acutely aware of the above:


1. He is not running against Hillary Clinton

“I’m not running against Hillary Clinton,” he said. “She’s a candidate, I’m a candidate, and I suspect that there will be other candidates. The people in this country will make their choice.” His socialist platform is “one that resonates” with the American people, and he believes he can effectively appeal to them no matter who his opponent is, or how large her war chest is. But, as he’s said, he’s engaged in “a real struggle against the billionaire class.
6 Things You Need to Know About Bernie Sanders


Is the above a reference to how he is an outsider to the royal bloodline from which every POTUS has come? If so, he truly is attempting a revolution.
edit on 11-2-2016 by Profusion because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

Makes me wonder nearly 8 years later if Dick Cheney regrets informing Obama that they are related... kinda gives a little bit of odd credibility to the bloodlines theory.

One of those sir names is Bundy... Oregon standoff anyone?

I'm heavily related to some of the sir names one is very closely related thats on this list... but no affiliation other than blood to any of these estranged family members; so no need to mention which as I'd rather this theory be just that theory... cause that would suck if the conspiracy true



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   
The problem with this theory is that it covers nearly everyone. I'm a 20th cousin to Prince Charles, documented. You probably are, too. Just do the math. 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, etc. and you are up to a trillion ancestors within 1,000 years and that takes you back just to 1066 and the invasion. Obviously, there's a lot of overlap so we're cousins every which way. If you are of British, Scottish, Irish ancestry, which a whole lot of us are. You're royal blood, too. In fact, there is no one alive on Earth who is further away than about 50th cousin, including all races. It only takes one Marco Polo or Dr. Livingstone to contribute to the gene pool a few hundred years ago for those genes to spread throughout the world.

So Hillary and Trump are 19th cousins? Meh? You are likely related just as closely.



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 07:39 PM
link   


you are up to a trillion ancestors within 1,000 years


I believe that's more than all the people who have ever lived, so your math may be off.



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 07:46 PM
link   
That's interesting. It looks like Donald Trump is related to the Clan Macleod. Does that mean he's an immortal?

-dex



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 07:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: CB328



you are up to a trillion ancestors within 1,000 years


I believe that's more than all the people who have ever lived, so your math may be off.


(Sigh! and Jesus F. Christ) AS I STATED, this simply means there is a lot of overlap and that we are all cousins several different ways. A "generation" is about 25 years, to be generous. It may be 20 years. So that means that very conservatively speaking, you have four generations per century. Times 10 is 1,000 years, or 40 generations. Now get out your little calculator and compute 2 to the 40th power, then come back here and tell me my math is off.

MY WHOLE POINT is to show that we are much more closely related than we think, and that Hillary and Trump being 19th cousins is really no big deal.
edit on 2/11/2016 by schuyler because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 09:03 PM
link   
^ ouch


that was a little cold, don't you think Schuyler?



posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   
Well he has Polish and Russian Jewish bloodlines.

I'm sure somebody can't find something.




posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 12:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

I do like the royal blood theory

I would say no matter how politically correct any of them appear

The are still the "1% behind closed doors" .. The saying follow the money trail?

From what I remember Obama administration is pro climate change yet he approved Royal Dutch drilling in Antarctica ocean.. I don't know how I came to this but I also believe Obama has investment in .. and the leader of Green political Party owns solar panel manufacturing company.. I just remember somehow coming to that conclusion when I read accidentally Obama vetoed (spelling) Thailand's biggest solar panel co(?) for antidumping policy after that the USA sales increased (I might be totally crazy on this one)

But collectively I doubt they don't feed each others pockets



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 01:13 AM
link   
a reply to: serpentines

Salient points, as the Earth has been increasing in temperature since the last ice age that dipped the arctic as low as New York city. We and other planets of similar water compositions in proximity to a star go through this cycle of heating and cooling naturally due to various causes, super volcanic, meteorite collision and the constant pumping green house gases from under the ocean, animal flatulence, decay, as well as our man made contribution.

But the issue ahead? Is the global ice melt... as large chunks of Antarctica and the Arctic melts and breaks off into the ocean... theres a similar effect as when adding ice cubes to a hot drink... the melt itself will cool things back down til eventually there's no ice at the poles as it has been in the past with scientists finding palm trees deep beneath the permafrost proving the world world at one time was temperate as the cycle goes. But this process unless in equilibrium to build more ice sheets and not thin ones easily melted away in spring and summer? We are in for global sea water rise of around 40ft? above sea level as the new sea level last I recall reading predictions... which means not only a drastic change in the shape of continents... but the economic disaster for all those needing to relocate to higher ground into communities that cannot support the growth... the hope is that the rise wont be fast enough allowing us to co-ordinate contingency plans ahead of it... time will tell as state sized chunks have been breaking off during summer.

I really dont see how bloodline conspiracy fits? Other than the 1% mentioned being able to afford buying up all the land and expand their personal fortunes on the 99%s backs in yet another way to work the economic squeeze and using a global catastrophe to do it... time will tell, but as you mentioned there have been heavy investments in markets that profit from suffering... but thats the capitalist way, and one of my criticisms of it.
edit on 12-2-2016 by BigBrotherDarkness because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2016 by BigBrotherDarkness because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 01:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Profusion
I would imagine everyone on this site is aware of the Most royal candidate theory.

It looks like if you're a Trump or a Clinton fan, you're in the clear:

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton revealed to be distant cousins as family trees show they share same set of royal ancestors

Could that be why they're the leaders after all?


The following article sums up something I've never seen discussed in detail about Sanders...his race:

As Bernie Sanders Makes History, Jews Wonder What It Means

Does Bernie Sanders have enough royal blood to be POTUS?

I've spent time researching it and I can't find any information about the royal blood of Bernie Sanders. As a proponent of the Most royal candidate theory I believe that may preclude him from having a chance at the White House. History does seem to indicate that after all.

Anyone have information on the royal blood of Bernie Sanders?

As a side note, Sanders seems to be acutely aware of the above:


1. He is not running against Hillary Clinton

“I’m not running against Hillary Clinton,” he said. “She’s a candidate, I’m a candidate, and I suspect that there will be other candidates. The people in this country will make their choice.” His socialist platform is “one that resonates” with the American people, and he believes he can effectively appeal to them no matter who his opponent is, or how large her war chest is. But, as he’s said, he’s engaged in “a real struggle against the billionaire class.
6 Things You Need to Know About Bernie Sanders


Is the above a reference to how he is an outsider to the royal bloodline from which every POTUS has come? If so, he truly is attempting a revolution.


What evidence is there that Oboma had a single shred of royalty cover anywhere near him.



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 03:12 AM
link   
a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness

Wow !!!!! Thank you for the reply so much

With the bloodline I just meant it is something I like to read as "conspiracy"

But your answer blew me



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 03:21 AM
link   
a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness

Given the subject of interest this paragraph I read always comes to mind

Old forum random conversation


You asked about the North Polar ice pack. I never said the environment wasn't a problem. Doesn't water expand when it freezes? If the polar ice cap melted, wouldn't sea level go down? I don't know if there's enough ice for this to make a difference and I'm not an expert on global warming.


edit on 12-2-2016 by serpentines because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

Bernie Sanders brother Larry Sanders is a British Citizen.

So i suppose that counts.




posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore
^ ouch that was a little cold, don't you think Schuyler?


Cold? I didn't realize I was dealing with people who had 3rd grade math skills, especially since I explained it the first time. The fact this guy actually got stars for such an ignorant post shows just how ATS "denies ignorance"--or not.



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

honestly, you were pretty rude about how you responded to that person - "Sigh! And Jesus F. Christ! AS I STATED" and " get out your tiny little calculator..." somewhat belittling and condescending, no?

My post is ignorant? All you have to do is get your point across WITHOUT being rude. Too much to ask apparently. (and yet I'm the ignorant one) Will you have anything respectful to say when replying (if you reply) to this comment? If not, reconsider hitting "Post".

How about being respectful? ATS would be a better experience if people acted a little more civilized towards one another. Your comments are way too harsh sometimes, just be respectful, it shouldn't be that hard to understand.
edit on 12-2-2016 by FamCore because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2016 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: serpentines

It does expand and it is strong enough when it does to cleave mountains in two and bust steel wide open... but expansion is not that much... just think of how 5" inches of rain can flood many areas the ice caps hold a lot more than 5" when melted and in the sea and water table beneath the ground.

While this sounds fine and dandy yay no more freezing anywhere tropical island year round most places... it means a lot more water for monsoons etc. since it wouldnt be cold enough except at very high elevations to form but as water goes through it's cycle of gas and liquid but not ice, the heat will eventually split the molecules and all the water will start dissipating, as oxygen and hydrogen, becoming dryer and dryer until theres none left unless we start bonding oxygen and hydrogen together to make it. Or else use the lessons gleaned from colonizing mars as thats what the earth will eventually look like, barring a meteorite or super volcano kicking up enough debris blocking out the sun bathing everything in darkness for however long causing a dramatic drop in temperature ushering in a new ice age IF there is any water left to do it... then after a period of time possibly lose its magnetic field completely... with no magnetic field.. the atmosphere would become so thin that solar winds simply blow it away...

But yeah this is why education is so important... so people are not caught with their glaciers down for whats going on and the how and why of it... or ignorant when knowledge is twisted for some ulterior motive... usually money which many equate to security so they try to secure as much of it as possible... whats the worlds largest diamond worth? Many would love to have that... put them in the middle of a desert dying of thirst with that diamond theyd trade it in an instant for enough water to live wouldnt they? So life is more important than money and value is a variable that can be manipulated.

Well, I dont want to derail the OP seems ive done quite enough of that today... on ATS not really intentional. But I dont like leaving questions unanswered and supply relevant knowledge to the best of my ability and cognizance of it at the time. Not an expert in some of these fields so current facts and figures can be off... but rarely are they needed to explain how something works as a functional concept for something observed... but they can be used as proofs and mathematics is not my strong suit linguistics is despite my informal usage of it breaking many of its rules as its the conveyance of information thats most important unless you have a thing for its structure and form as a thing of art in that case pardon my abstracts.


edit on 13-2-2016 by BigBrotherDarkness because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-2-2016 by BigBrotherDarkness because: solar wind order



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join