It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Tiamat384
Ok yes their sight and size and age would suggest they may be far more intelligent than we imagined
Or if you like, far more advanced up that magical tree some tend to believe in
So to repeat, Their sight, not there site
originally posted by: PhotonEffect
a reply to: Tiamat384
What's interesting is how the bacteria are able to perceive/observe without a brain.
originally posted by: beansidhe
Exactly, since we process information gathered through the rods and cones, in our brain. For years now I've been under the illusion we 'see' with our brain. And now this slime has waltzed in and completely obliterated that illusion.
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: PhotonEffect
Well yes without a brain, but the microscopic version, the nucleus still gathers data, does it not?
originally posted by: stormcell
It is possible to act on visual input without having a brain. Jellyfish have some basic logic based on the input from all their eye-spots. They keep swimming towards the darkest object they can see until they are in the shade.
Spherical cyanobacteria are probably the world’s smallest and oldest example of a camera eye.
Raggedyman
To suggest that they have sight makes them a far more complex organism than anyone could have probably imagined
Bacterial phototaxis was first recognized over a century ago
correct me if I'm wrong, but are you suggesting that they can only see where there is light rather than what the OP is saying that they can see as humans do, but at a lower resolution?
originally posted by: beansidhe
a reply to: Bedlam
Slime isn't "seeing" the way you do, either. It's looking for the direction the light's coming from.
Oh ok, so it's less 'basically the same way that we do' and more 'exactly the same way that plants do'? How disappointing.