Obama: We Do Not Expect Harmful Radiation to Reach the USA Mainland, Hawaii, or Guam
And then he left with his family on an unplanned trip to South America, with GE CEO Geoffrey Emmelt. Proof is at the bottom, please read this whole
For those who haven't been running down the Fukushima rabbit hole (requires a whole lot of red pills, lol), let me explain.
Obama gets a huge portion of his funding from the Energy businesses and especially nuclear. Same with Hillary. They do the bidding of their
masters. So when Fukushima happened, it could very well have caused the death of the Nuclear Cartel. Releasing the truth about Fukushima would
also cause mass panic, and near term financial losses. So Obama downplayed it, pretended that no radiation was coming, although clearly the experts
knew that plenty of radiation was coming.
The radiation dose, and thus future disease and cancers, could have been cut 75% simply by him going on TV and saying stay out of the rain, and
curtail necessary trips. Instead, he threw the American people under the buss, we are just starting to see the front edge of the cancer epidemic.
The next part of the plot? Radiation mixes very slowly between the northern and southern hemisphere, so the safest thing to do to avoid "the plume"
is to go to the southern hemisphere. Which is exactly what Obama did, taking his family with, and the CEOs of General Electric (builder of the
Fukushima power plant) and Westinghouse (also a nuclear powerhouse)
Let me be very clear, he killed Americans
Hmmmmmmmm. Watch this video.
we are bringing all available resources to bear....our 50 mile evacuation is based on careful scientific evaluation". Jackzo was later sacked in his
job. 10 to 1 he got a pension from US.
On April 8th, 2011, 4 weeks after GE's reactors blow up in Fukushima, this article in Forbes RE
The Unholy Marriage Of GE And President Obama At The Altar Of Industrial Policy
Note--there are only 2 comments on this story that is 4 years old. Americans have no interest in this humdrum boring industrial political
story....even though it pervades their life in dozens of ways, and feeds the governmental corruption and the .1% www.forbes.com...
In July 2010, Jeffrey Immelt was harshly critical of Obama, and of "The Bernank". Funny, I have been harshly critical of both of them, and they never
handed me a sweet gig with great benefits.
Business doesn’t like the president, and he feels the same way about business, Immelt said. He contrasted Obama’s attitude to that of German
Chancellor Angela Merkel, who defends German industry, Immelt said.
“I am not sure that in the end they want any of us to win, or any of us to be successful.”
So Obama silences the criticism by handing him a government high office.
On March 15th the Government announced Obama and family going to Brazil and Chile:
White House press secretary Jay Carney said the president and first lady Michelle Obama will meet with the leaders and speak to the people of these
countries (Brazil and Chile) to discuss a broad range of issues including economic prosperity and job creation through increased trade and
partnerships, energy and security cooperation, shared values and other regional and global concerns
Agreed with above. A little background for some folks could be beneficial.
Ive followed this story since the meltdown and always knew that (as usual) we weren't being told the whole story. My suspicion was always that the GE
designed facility would have political fallout (no pun intended) in the States, and that it was "hushed up" to protect the official story that
nuclear power is safe, and the future.
At least in Chernobyl they sent in the liquidators (rest in piece) and got it "done" to the best of their abilities. I have a feeling we haven't heard
the last of Fukushima.
edit on 10-2-2016 by deuceawesome because: (no reason given)
Things like this are always being done and discussed. If you just ATS search "Jeffrey Immelt" you will find many of the like results. This may have
been discussed before here as I have memory reading of it here but I wont but wont be looking through all the articles to site it. The white house
will constantly tell you "Correlation does not imply causation" and there is no proof of anything sinister so no investigation is started.
It's #ty, what'cha going to do about it though?
edit on 10-2-2016 by Antipathy17 because: (no reason given)
What does Obama going to Brazil have to do with anything? Was he supposed to say no harm from Fukushima then go to Japan? I really am not sure how
Obama's itinerary has anything to do with the legitimacy of his words. Please explain.
I mean, if you ask me, Brazil is CERTAINLY a riskier place to travel healthwise than Japan is. What with Zika and all.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
So what's the fukushima death toll up to now?
Has it hit 2 yet?
If you are including all the old people who have died of stress and or committed suicide due the mishandling of the assistance by the Japanese
government, then yes, more then 2 have died. And besides that, Japan has passed a State Secrecy Law, one cannot speak now of the truth without
government approval and I assume that includes the death and injury toll. I live here in a medical university town and government doctors are not
allowed to go public with any facts on the health issues of their patients. Why, well, I assume they want to keep their job and not thrown in jail.
So Obama hasn't been to Japan since 2012? Or are you just focusing on this particular trip? Again, I'm pretty sure the Zika outbreak is a MUCH bigger
threat to things than the fukushima radiation currently is.
SMRs do not have working models, combining heat, pressure, salt, ferrous metals, and winger effect from neutron bombardment is about one of the
stupidest things our three pound insane monkey brain could come up with.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.