It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Theory that may help explain the Problem Of Evil

page: 7
7
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm




Great.

Bye Bye now.



Looking forward to your next on topic syllable with grreat eagerness.
edit on Rpm21116v31201600000041 by randyvs because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 11 2016 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: ClownFish



Now we're getting somewhere. Peace to all who enter here.


On second thought....but, well, never mind. Good night all. I'm having trouble remembering what this topic is about. But I'm thinking that maybe this problem of evil can't be explained. Seems rather it's being fed as we speak. But it does remain interesting to observe how this is going, or not going, or going, or not going, or...???



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 03:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: vethumanbeing
WTF are you talking about???
Other realms??? Trophies for possessing sick human bodies???
Can you validate any of that at all with any kind of evidence???

Perhaps you lack natural curiosity; dismissing the major question "Why Am I Here"? In that one sentiment will lead oneself/an individual to discover the truths of your soul/eternal existence (reason for being) on this material world Earth (the only one of its kind). As was said in "A Few Good Men" (film) "You can't handle the truth". Of course there are higher realms less dense just as valid or invalid as this one; vibrating at a higher frequency. You do not dream? Those are not dreams, you are visiting those other realms using your higher self conscience. Let me put it simply; 'science fiction' is not as fictitious as you may imagine; and this truth has been pounded upon us since the writing of "The Coming Race" by Edward Bulwer Lord Lytton.
edit on 12-2-2016 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Yes that's all very interesting and I've thought about those deeper questions too my friend. But that doesn't answer anything to do with what you were saying before. It's just more vague woo speak.

I'd like to know more about these so called realms which you are apparently very familiar with that have entities possessing people who are sick or injured or whatever and getting trophies for it.

Now dreams are actually real places too huh??? All dreams??? Some of them??? What?? And you can verify this right??? Do you have anything at all which helps validate anything your talking about???

Also, what does this have to do with the topic??
edit on 12-2-2016 by mOjOm because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2016 @ 04:11 PM
link   
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: vethumanbeing

mOjOm: Yes that's all very interesting and I've thought about those deeper questions too my friend. But that doesn't answer anything to do with what you were saying before. It's just more vague woo speak.

Its arcane knowledge; that being said has been systematically hidden by others with a political bent (the information is out there) just not mainstream.

mOjOm: I'd like to know more about these so called realms which you are apparently very familiar with that have entities possessing people who are sick or injured or whatever and getting trophies for it.

Those souls don't *possess* these individuals; just as you are not possessed. This is an opportunity is all to experience human form in a short term contract. Let me attempt perspective; a SIDS baby is one that the soul was to enter reneged or bailed on that contract; the child dies without a soul inception (seen as criminal).

mOjOm: Now dreams are actually real places too huh??? All dreams??? Some of them??? What?? And you can verify this right??? Do you have anything at all which helps validate anything your talking about??? Also, what does this have to do with the topic??

Of course they are; why else would you experience them; they are lessons to drag your soul (kicking and screaming) into a higher awareness of who you actually are: ETERNAL; you do not just exist in this third dimension, you/your consciousness exists in many other places at once. As far as being off topic; you exacerbated the discussion with your questioning.
edit on 12-2-2016 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2016 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Murgatroid

I was reading through some of this thread, and saw your testimony. Beautiful testimony, may God continue to bless you greatly! Very inspiring indeed!



posted on Feb, 14 2016 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Speaking of off topic crap...all I did was point out how morally oriented you sound. Clearly your grasp of naughty and nice is unparalleled. Perhaps you could name an absolute moral? Something that is absolutely wrong or right in literally any context? Instead of trying to rip me a new one on the internet, because that's just so love thy neighbor, ya know...



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pinocchio
I Spoke To God.... And He Said: "You Funny Children Exist... Because I Don't Interfere In Every Aspect Of Your Existence..."
"If I Did.... You Would Not Exist!"
"I Dont Decide Who Loves Who... When They Love... Why They Love... Where They Love... What They Love... And How They Love.!!!"

Indeed he doesn't. Could be an obvious reason for that.


originally posted by: PinocchioGo Kiss Your Parents Asses... Then Give Thanks To The Never Ending Story That Has Resulted In Your Existence And In Your Well Being. Do Not Be Arrogant... I Am Real... Just Like You!"

What of those people (probably the majority) on this planet for whom existence amounts to bitter hardship every day in order to do that..simply to survive? What of those who don't feel that having existence forced on them is all that it's proclaimed to be (often by comfortable 1st world middle class inhabitants spouting religion)? Commanding them to rejoice being forced into such misery wouldn't also be slightly arrogant (not to mention extremely ignorant)???

It might be worth studying the way our natural world really works. No intelligent being could devise such a system, surely.



edit on 15-2-2016 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 01:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: mOjOm

More bluntly then.
My view is what it is and most of the redundant little toy treasure
questiions atheists hold so dear. Do nothing but make them look
really pathetic and stupid in my view.


So atheists that don't share your view, look pathetic and stupid lol? Well done Randy.

The beliefs of religious people usually seem a little on the wrong side of ridiculous (though not always), yet in many ways understandable (in context). The people themselves though, are usually neither pathetic nor stupid. Certainly not because they hold one unrealistic belief. Wrong perhaps. Religious devotion does seem to coexist with an ignorance of things like basic science literacy in many instances, but generally (apart from the real extremists) we are all much the same really.







edit on 15-2-2016 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 04:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
More bluntly then.
My view is what it is and most of the redundant little toy treasure
questiions atheists hold so dear. Do nothing but make them look
really pathetic and stupid in my view.


How can you expect respect and tolerance from Atheists towards your views and not reciprocate?

I personally think that believing in organised religion's version of God is far more silly than not believing in God at all.



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Cogito, Ergo Sum




So atheists that don't share your view, look pathetic and stupid lol? Well done Randy.


Cog, you try'n to throw me off kilter by put'n me on the defense?

Did I make that sound as if I meant all atheists? Yes I did but
that's not what I meant and you know it.

W?E
edit on Rpm21516v05201600000016 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2016 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cogito, Ergo Sum
It might be worth studying the way our natural world really works. No intelligent being could devise such a system, surely.

Actually the human would/should never have existed or evolved naturally within this ecosystem. The way the natural world works is the human only had 3 million years to evolve fast track (ridiculous) and other much older predatory species would have dispatched with great haste this helpless hairless creature as a tasty food source (and did not need fire to roast the meat to proper temperature).
edit on 15-2-2016 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 03:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs

Cog, you try'n to throw me off kilter by put'n me on the defense?

Did I make that sound as if I meant all atheists? Yes I did but
that's not what I meant and you know it.

W?E


I think you meant it exactly how you wrote it. However, now you want to try and claim different. But you're intelligent enough and experienced enough with this topic to know the difference.

Trying to say you meant something else now just makes it worse by lying about it.



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 03:28 AM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Well, obviously not. We do have some clever adaptations and skills which make us very good at survival. What we lack in physical ability we easily make up for in creativity, planning and teamwork.



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm




Trying to say you meant something else now just makes it worse by lying about it.


I don't lie about anything on these boards mO.
And only atheists accuse me of that. Does it
sound like I'm saying all atheists. Yes it does,
but that's not what I meant and you know it.

On the other hand, I consider it a trmendous compliment
that you refferrenced myself as intelligent. As much as I loath
speaking of myself, it's you atheists that have given me the
most startling compliments. And you are one of them.

I just get lazy sometimes and don't bother to say things more correctly.
My Bad, but it seems a little weak in my eyes to use semantics that way.
edit on Rpm21616v02201600000038 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
This is my first double post in some time.
Tastes like crap.

Thogh!
edit on Ram21616v33201600000037 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Dark Ghost




I personally think that believing in organised religion's version of God is far more silly than not believing in God at all.


But not believing in God at all is silly isn't it?
Your post is my truth as per why I just follow the Lord
and steer clear of the organized.
edit on Ram21616v35201600000032 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs

I don't lie about anything on these boards mO.
And only atheists accuse me of that. Does it
sound like I'm saying all atheists. Yes it does,
but that's not what I meant and you know it.


Yes it does. That's exactly what we're saying. I always figure people mean what they say. I don't waste time trying to interpret what others say.


On the other hand, I consider it a trmendous compliment
that you refferrenced myself as intelligent. As much as I loath
speaking of myself, it's you atheists that have given me the
most startling compliments. And you are one of them.


Well, you know me. Mr. Nice guy. Always full of compliments.



I just get lazy sometimes and don't bother to say things more correctly.
My Bad, but it seems a little week in my eyes to use semantics that way.


It happens. But you're better than that. Just reminding you of that.



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 12:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
But not believing in God at all is silly isn't it?
Your post is my truth as per why I just follow the Lord
and steer clear of the organized.


Not silly at all. Even you reject the belief of every other God but your own. Which means you're just one step away from being atheist yourself. Same can be said of every other monotheistic religious member. It's not silly at all once you realize that even the believers are non believers too.



posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

The non believers can be believers too? Wait, no you said.

Oh just forget it!!! Gawd, I feel like I'm sleep writing. LMAO



new topics




 
7
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join