It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by P Amaru
considering dogs are deemed dirty in islam, i doubt the dogs are the for any other reason then to help the US... so what good does pointing out the dogs are under control of the iraqis....
I wish the US would start sending all the dumb patriots to Iraq instead of the young kids being sent, i mean id even pay to have some1 like you sent to iraq if i could :/
Originally posted by Skibum
Originally posted by P Amaru
considering dogs are deemed dirty in islam, i doubt the dogs are the for any other reason then to help the US... so what good does pointing out the dogs are under control of the iraqis....
I wish the US would start sending all the dumb patriots to Iraq instead of the young kids being sent, i mean id even pay to have some1 like you sent to iraq if i could :/
The reason for piinting it out is because its true. The dogs are being used by the Iraqis. Nowhere in any of the articles does it say differently. The US dogs generally eat as well as or better than the human troops.
As for the other part of your statement, what exactly is someone like me?
Someone who points out an error in a reported piece. If he had included an article with any sort of mention that the dogs were part of the US forces, I wouldn't have been able to say they weren't US dogs. But all the articles say clearly the dogs are used by the Iraqis.