It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: EightTF3
Dear EightTF3,
Did you check in details the numbers of John Kasich? He was not better than her but it is in the debate, how about the ones of candidates that were clearly below her scores, like Mike Huckabee, Christ Christie or Jim Gilmore?
This primary of New Hampshire is no longer the caucus of Iowa, the two states belong to very different regions of the country, so a decision can't take those results as its only referent to call candidates in a debate , national polls must be also taken in account.
Thanks,
The Angel of Lightness
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: The angel of light
I actually like her more than many of the candidates, but if she hasn't pulled more numbers by now I find it unlikely that she will given the debate formats and the refusal of mainstream America to pay attention to anything that can't be reduced to a twitter post.
Our system is crap and money talks. I would encourage you to vote Sanders or Trump if it comes down to it. We need to break this system.
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Our country is so absurdly apathetic that we can only characterize any form of grass roots movement as a pipe dream.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Our country is so absurdly apathetic that we can only characterize any form of grass roots movement as a pipe dream.
Hey, pipe dreams built this country. Nobody thought it would work out. If I have to hang my hope on a pipe dream I'll take that over giving up hope.
If I can open a few minds and each of them can open a few.... better than giving up. Truth can be contagious under the right conditions.
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
a reply to: The angel of light
May the Light guide you.
The cold, hard truth is that she has 0% chance of winning anything. And to be honest, ABC should only put Rubio, Trump, and Cruz in the debate because no one else has a chance from the republican side. The debate would be so much better with less people anyway.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
a reply to: The angel of light
May the Light guide you.
The cold, hard truth is that she has 0% chance of winning anything. And to be honest, ABC should only put Rubio, Trump, and Cruz in the debate because no one else has a chance from the republican side. The debate would be so much better with less people anyway.
I don't know. I think Kasich is picking up steam. And I've always wanted all the candidates to be in on the debates. Smaller is better though, I agree. I like the Democratic debates now it's just Hillary and Sanders. No interference or distraction.
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: ExNihiloRed
a reply to: The angel of light
May the Light guide you.
The cold, hard truth is that she has 0% chance of winning anything. And to be honest, ABC should only put Rubio, Trump, and Cruz in the debate because no one else has a chance from the republican side. The debate would be so much better with less people anyway.
I don't know. I think Kasich is picking up steam. And I've always wanted all the candidates to be in on the debates. Smaller is better though, I agree. I like the Democratic debates now it's just Hillary and Sanders. No interference or distraction.
To be fair, my post was pre-Rubio meltdown and NH shocker (who the F* votes for JEB?!). Kasich is tolerable.