It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: TheBulk
lol, so. I think they are much worse actually. Ignorance is scary as hell, especially when our political leaders have ignorance. Just think of what would happen if a Tea Party psycho became president...mandatory church? stoning non Christians, no womens rights? stoning gays?
scary
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Spider879
Lol, "11 misconceptions about black lives matter" brought to you by blacklivesmatter dot com... BRILLIANT! Totally unbiased too I'm sure. Heh.
Yes I prefer to let them speak for themselves than to let media or their opponents speak for them, I am sure you would want the Tea Party's or the Militia to explain their own views rather than through someone else's filter.
That the cop didn't know the guy just robbed a place? Are you seriously suggesting that if the cop didn't know, it never happened?
Also, the teenager wasn't unarmed, but was actually trying to get the cop's weapon.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Spider879
Sorry man, but that was a planned march and streets were respectively blocked off. MLK never blocked traffic or innocent people from getting to point B. There are other ways of getting your point across without getting innocent people, that want nothing to do with it, involved. Being disruptive only makes people dislike you and not give half a # what your cause is.
originally posted by: SwillsWhat is amazing is the perception of both groups and how people react to them. You can see the clear line of the political paradigm but you also see how differently white people and black people are treated in this country.
BLM can be a very aggressive group of people when they protest, most notably when they rushed the platform during a Sanders rally. The media was not kind to them at all and the BLM protesters gave the MSM plenty to work with in demonizing them. They've been called thugs, terrorists, radicals, you name it. The most popular news network, Fox News, even compared them to the KKK.
Here on ATS I would dare say the majority of posts I've read whenever BLM is brought up are negative using all the words I listed about to describe them and more. A big negative association posted about BLM are accusations of inciting violence against the police. BLM was born from police brutality.
Then recently a militia led by son's of a man we've heard of before, Bundy, take over a federal building by force and they're armed. They flat out threaten the lives of any authority trying to remove them. How does the media react to them? They call them armed protesters.
So when can we throw our petty political differences aside, prejudices, and come together to solve this problem?
originally posted by: buster2010
If the kid was armed then why did he try to grab the cops gun?
that doesn't exist no.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: TheBulk
a reply to: Spider879
Funny that the video you posted is full of clips from Democrats and the media demonizing them. While the media protects and promotes BLM.
So the vid of the Tea Party ppl spitting at congress people didn't happened??
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Oh, no...this movement has gone waaaaaaaaaaay beyond wanting equal rights and fair treatment from law enforcement - they push the white privilege meme to the nth degree and are vocally anti-white - not "equal rights for blacks"
BIG difference.
The Oregon protest is the very definition of white privilege. Do you think if any other group of people had taken over a federal building the same way these drama queens did they would be treated the same way?
You mean like if they were to loot and riot and burn multi-million dollar businesses down, along with other businesses that belonged to locals while the police stood by and watched? Yeah, you're not biased or anything.
You do of course have proof that BLM was behind that right? It would appear that the biased one here is the one placing the blame for what rioters did on a group without proof.
You can try to tell yourself the BLM is never involved in any of this, but their chants alone are enough to make any claim of violence legit.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: buster2010
If the kid was armed then why did he try to grab the cops gun?
He was hopped up.
Capable of anything.
originally posted by: TheBulk
that doesn't exist no.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: TheBulk
a reply to: Spider879
Funny that the video you posted is full of clips from Democrats and the media demonizing them. While the media protects and promotes BLM.
So the vid of the Tea Party ppl spitting at congress people didn't happened??
Abandoned homes. Compromised bank accounts. Threatened family members. Constant fear.
Employees of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge said they’re going through all of that and more, as an armed occupation at the facility reaches its 20th day.
“I’m afraid to go back at this point,” said a refuge employee in an exclusive interview Wednesday. “I would say that this is the most disrupted my life has ever been.”
“I had a conversation with a high school student,” McBride told OPB, “and she wanted to know if someone entered the school with a gun, what was she to do. And I had a 5-year-old come up to me and say she couldn’t sleep at night, because someone was watching her in the trees.”
“This is not okay,” McBride added.