It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As water falls back from the stem, it forms a dense highly radioactive cloud called the "base surge". Stern of the USS Saratoga can be seen rising 43 feet on the crest of the first wave (94 feet high and 1000 feet from surface zero). Waves 6 feet high were seen 22,000 feet (7 km) from the explosion.
as posted by Ycon
...first off the article didn't say they used an atomic bomb. It said "believed to be potentially as effective as the atom bomb"
Could the Russians have triggered the recent Asian Tsunami?
1. Do stories differ as to how many missiles were fired? Yes.
2. Are the missiles capable of reaching this distance from Russia? Yes.
3. Is Russia playing war games with the U.S.? Yes.
4. Was notification of the Tsunami delayed? Yes.
5. Is world depopulation a planned and coordinated effort? Yes.
6. What was that strange silence by all world leaders??
Did New York Orchestrate The Asian Tsunami?
With Afghanistan and Iraq already lost, the Wall Street bankers were all desperately looking for other ways to control our world, when suddenly and very conveniently, the Sumatran Trench exploded. Trick or Treat?
Originally posted by Seekerof
One problem with this continued notion of "it was possibly a bunch of nukes detonating" theory that caused the earthquake and subsequent tsunami's: the 'theory' does not take into account the radiation levels that would undoubtedly be emitted or that would be 'leaked' or surfaced.
You would be better off or served by going at it by asserting and claiming that HAARP or Low Frequency Active Radar had something to do with casuing the earthquake and subsequent tsunami's.
Originally posted by Nygdan
The energhy released in the 9.0 tsunami generator was tremendous, larger than any sort of nuke devised, hundreds or thousands of times greater than that of the hiroshima/nagasaki bombs.
A tsunami is made by displacing lots of water quickly. It would mean a tremendous, a truly stupendous bomb, one that would not go unnoticed, or an earthquake, which is what was recorded, or a submarine landslide.
Also, if the US, or any western country, could do that, they'd simply rule the planet with it and use it to do more than kill some villagers and tourists
Originally posted by Montana
I don't see any coincidences other than those you are making up out of thin air. Really, do you think that much radioactivity would go unnoticed? How about the gigantic mushroom cloud that would occur? You would be talking about the single largest explosion ever created, and no one notices a difference from 'normal' earthquakes?
This is just lame.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yes, I read your article...a couple times
...but the thing that is getting me is that you are continuing to present evidences that the earthquake and tsunami's were quite possibly man-made and having something to do with the nuclear "coincedences". I'm not blasting you, Ycon, nor am I belittling your topic. I am merely presenting evidences and thoughts to the contrary.
"Coincedences" would imply what?
As to the detection of such radiation, there are numerous countires that have satellites that can readily and easily detect such. Incidently, the amount of surfaced dead fish and ocean wildlife in that area would be hard missed. Thats direct observation.
It was a natural occurance, simple as that.
I guess when the "Big One" finally does ("if") hit California and it breaks off, it will be because of placed and detonated nuclear devices within the fault line, despite the past and current ongoing warnings and signs that have been proclaimed and asserted by many upon many eduacted in asserting and claiming such?