It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cooperton
I think carbon dating is going to be an integral part of discerning the truth of the matter. Dinosaurs which were carbon dated were shown to be between 4,000-40,000 years old according to C-14 data:
Carbon dating dinosaur fossils
Insistent data is obviously required, but this is a curious empirical observation. Finding DNA and other soft tissues in dinosaurs indicate these organisms are not millions of years old, and carbon-dating agrees with such a conclusion.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
I find it hilarious how the theory of evolution is constantly evolving to suit it's own needs and attempt to cover up its own mistakes...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Rather funny how you assume to know how most think and feel about thier faith and what is literal or symbolic...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
But then again it's no real surprise coming from one who prescribes to a science filled with little more then assumption itself...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Perhaps you would find the bible more realistic if it was re written on a daily basis then it too could be a work of evolution for you just like the science of evolution...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Ah so you realize that man actually walked the earth at the same time as dinosaurs then...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Seeing as you believe the sediment the fossils are contained have also uncovered footprints of man and dinosaurs side by side...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
And surely burial pits which contain both human and dinosaur fossils elude to the same thing...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
How does evolution back peddle to refute this evidence?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Oh I dunno off the top of my head...
Thinking on it*
The doheny expedition and the paluxy riverbed for example
If that's how it's spelled come to mind...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
What about cave paintings and hyrogliphics depicting humans with dinosaurs?
How about the book of Enoch did he believe the earth was flat?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Do you believe that some of the people who comprised and edited the books of the bible were as proud and foolish as some scientists who peddle evolution and choose how and what information they portray?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
And would you agree that further observation shows the errors of thier findings and claims?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
So the fellow who had limited knowledge of earth in ancient times who observered the land before him as flat was less correct then a man who makes a false observation in the name of science?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Or are you willing to admit they would both be wrong?
I think carbon dating is going to be an integral part of discerning the truth of the matter. Dinosaurs which were carbon dated were shown to be between 4,000-40,000 years old according to C-14 data:
Carbon dating dinosaur fossils
Insistent data is obviously required, but this is a curious empirical observation. Finding DNA and other soft tissues in dinosaurs indicate these organisms are not millions of years old, and carbon-dating agrees with such a conclusion.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Ah so you realize that man actually walked the earth at the same time as dinosaurs then...
Seeing as you believe the sediment dating is accurate... the sediment the fossils are contained in have also revealed footprints of man and dinosaurs side by side...
And surely burial pits which contain both human and dinosaur fossils elude to the same thing...
How does evolution back peddle to refute this evidence?
Does it assume to have an answer for this as well?
If so do you consider this to be factual also?
originally posted by: Phantom423
You really should bone up on your research skills. There's no excuse not to understand how C14 dating works - there is a massive amount of literature out there that has confirmed the mechanism 1000 times.
Here's a C14 dating calculator - I even filled in the blanks for you! You might want to read the link - it could change your life!
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
I find it hilarious how the theory of evolution is constantly evolving to suit it's own needs and attempt to cover up its own mistakes...
Rather funny how you assume to know how most think and feel about thier faith and what is literal or symbolic...
But then again it's no real surprise coming from one who prescribes to a science filled with little more then assumption itself...
Perhaps you would find the bible more realistic if it was re written on a daily basis then it too could be a work of evolution for you just like the science of evolution...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Ah so you realize that man actually walked the earth at the same time as dinosaurs then...
Seeing as you believe the sediment dating is accurate... the sediment the fossils are contained in have also revealed footprints of man and dinosaurs side by side...
And surely burial pits which contain both human and dinosaur fossils elude to the same thing...
How does evolution back peddle to refute this evidence?
Does it assume to have an answer for this as well?
If so do you consider this to be factual also?
originally posted by: cooperton
The percent modern carbon found in dinosaurs has been readable and consistently demonstrates it is younger than 40,000 years old, and 4,000 years old at its youngest. Not only are these consistent readable levels of C-14, they demonstrate these organisms are not millions of years old. Here is a summary:
Carbon-14 comparison in Dinosaurs