It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman
"Why do they have to go into a lab"
Anyone else need a dry martini?
Are you poking fun at me
I have a challenge, how about answering my question
Why do people who have questions and issues with what scientist say or do have to go into a lab
Are you actually saying only people who go into a lab have the right to question other lab workers
That's pure insanity, please think about what you are sayin, really put thought into what you think
You are making science a religious cult
Why do you hate science, why do you deny science, why make science evil and corrupt
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I havnt made any claims, just questioned yours
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I don't respect your science or opinion
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Cypress
How did this occour by chance randomly if it was a forced mutation?
Your point is irrelevant...
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Ghost147
Ghost, getting back to your original post, I haven't been able to find the author or citation from PNAS. Do you have a citation because I would like to read the research paper from Columbia. Thanks.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I havnt made any claims, just questioned yours
Is that so?
Well, I've gone ahead and compiled every single claim you've made so far in this topic from page 1 to present.
None of which you have ever provided any citation, reference, or any source of information to substantiate these claims. If you really believe you haven't made a single claim this thread, then you're beyond simple delusions, you're actually completely psychotic.
~ Most of that [fossil] record consists of a few bones that scientists have created a whole species from.
~ Just recently we all discovered Neanderthal was human
~ [Evolutionary Biologists] have evidence on the table? Yeah, just not the public table, just behind closed doors
~ There is nothing objective about studying bones
~ Evolution has never been observed
~ Evolution is not objective.
~ No direct evidence is observed
~ You [Ghost147] wont address [questions]. You will answer the questions in a manner that appeases your own curiosity level, a level that is 100% accepting of evolution
~ [Evolution] is a lie, an assumption, a best guess as I have stated
~ [Evolution] is a stupid belief that has no valid scientific argument
~ If we believe in intelligent design then the design is perfect, the environment has changed, the situation since the designer created the perfect design
~ Science is about observing what happened [Subjectively]
~ Hey Phantom, I will have a crack without reading your link. It's all imaginary, assumption, make believe. The evidence doesn't exist, it's all assumption just like the op,s address
~ [Radiocarbon dating doesn’t] have evidence for a constant
~ Ghost147 is misrepresenting science, dating, nobody knows the earths environmental conditions with any certainty 1000 years ago never mind the conditions associated with dates you imagine
~ If you address a post to me I won't bother reading it (yet here we are 5 pages later, you still responding to my comments)
~ I am, poking holes in your faith, asking real questions, pushing science for answers.
~ Monkeys to mankind, no evidence, none at all, just assumption, no proof, just bones in the ground
~ That's right, science is testable, evolution is not, therefore evolution is a religion, a faith, a belief
~ Evolution is not testable, never as, never has been
~ Evolution is a theory with no foundation outside of faith
~ atheists hate science so much
~ [you] just make stuff up and reposts it over and over again, with the premise assumed science
~ Not one genuine scientific answer based on evidence was ever offered in that thread, a complete failure as I saw it.
~ Ghost you dont answer questions, you dont seem to understand your answers are invalid, you offer no answers, just rhetoric
~ Genetic diversity does not make evolution
~ Humans seem closely related to pigs as well, common designer
~ Genetic diversity is the mixture of the parents Dna enhanced by the environment
~ Genetic diversity is not special evolution.
~ The world is older than it seems is a common mantra in evolution
~ every decade they add millions of years onto [Earth’s] existence,
~ Evolutionists like yourself deny the reality of science
And just for fun, this is you responding to one of my comments where I accurately addressed and debunked the claims you had made about Radiocarbon dating.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I don't respect your science or opinion
I could address all that but its not worth my effort
You believe in a false religion called science and I like to have fun poking holes in it
I don't respect your science or opinion
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
I could address all that but its not worth my effort
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
I could address all that but its not worth my effort
I know you won't put the effort into addressing any of them, you never did it the first time, why would the second be any different?
You're here to slander, and that's it.
~ You claim to be here to ask questions, but you also directly state that you aren't going to listen to responses
~ You claim to 'poke holes in the theory of evolution and our science', but you don't substantiate anything you say
~ You claim to know specific things about the topic at hand, and that our version is a lie, and you state it in such a way as it's a 'matter of fact' but you don't actually present your facts.
You are a troll, or you are delusional, and your lack of everything but slander and unsubstantiated claims demonstrates that.
Leave science to the intellectuals. If you want to discuss something formally and really want to do more with your words other than empty slander, we're always willing to converse with you. Until then, it appears you need to mature a little before entering the room for adults.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
The difference is Ghost I know how stupid it is wasting my time and breath
originally posted by: Raggedyman
What I will do is question and poke holes in your scientifi religios jargon nonsense
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Let me again ask what these words are doing in a theory that is proven
mired in uncertainty, new estimates, previously thought, time estimates appear, at odds ,
Based on this model, using what we know, suggests, supporting the notion of a mutational slowdown, time estimates reconcile , they suggest, may have occurred.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Evolution is a religion, not a science
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Evolution, flys turning into flys, Woopy doo
originally posted by: Raggedyman
You may imagine yourself the grand poobah of atheism and evolution but to many you are a little bit silly
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Cypress
Natural mutations normally caused by aging and the energy deficiency that is evident is known to cause disease...
It is also known that some cells that are always present in an organisms are already predisposed and only need to be activated to cause the disease to take hold...
Furthermore such can not be a valid claim for evolution as it is not considered to be a progression...
originally posted by: kkrattiger
My brother and I were watching a National Geographic show about the universe, and I turned to him and asked "So, Creationists can't watch this show?"
I mean, it's got astrophysicists talking about the age of things in space.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Genetic diversity is the mixture of the parents Dna enhanced by the environment
Genetic diversity is not special evolution.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Genetic diversity is the mixture of the parents Dna enhanced by the environment
Yes! That enhancement you mentioned are mutations to the DNA. That is how we evolve.
You've just confirmed evolution, my friend!
Genetic diversity is not special evolution.
You are correct again: it is not special evolution, it simply is EVOLUTION.
Now you get it!
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Raggedyman
As has been explained to you MULTIPLE TIMES.
Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is the best well-substantiated explanation of said fact.
Here's a quick wiki page you probably won't read due to your abundant ignorance.
EVOLUTION AS FACT AND THEORY
It's not a big page. I'm sure you can read it pretty quick.
ETA Just to add AGAIN. Evolution isn't A science. It is derived from multiple sciences.