It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
concoctions manipulation enzymes to enzymes plants to plants...
Show me fish to plant...
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: cooperton
Reply:
Contamination
Standard deviation and standard error calculations still put a small amount of C14 at zero.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: cooperton
Reply:
Contamination
Standard deviation and standard error calculations still put a small amount of C14 at zero.
Ah Great! I'm glad you brought this up. If this were true, then diamonds, coal, and dinosaurs should all show the same small amount of C14 at zero (if they are in fact hundreds of millions of years old). BUT, they show varying degrees of C-14 which is expectable; the data says that dinosaurs are younger than coal which is younger than diamonds:
Age of Dinosaurs < Coals < Diamonds
If these remains were all millions of years old, they would be showing the same background amount of C-14 reading, but they don't. This indicates these remains are in the thousands of years, not millions. Unless you want to backtrack and say carbon dating is now wrong because it disproves an old earth?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Ghost147
Oh I see so it's always changing just like the theory of evolution or what's considered to be proof for it and you will provide that proof even if it has to be created in a lab and a leap of faith may be required to believe the results to be proof of a supposed natural process over time...
And if that does not sell it that's OK because with more time we can suppose something new is proof!
originally posted by: mOjOm
Clearly you can all see that's it's pointless to carry on a discussion with oracle. He's just trolling and he admits it. He's already said he's doing this to piss people off and it's not his first time. I've called him out in a number of threads in the past. It's the same tactics every time as well.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Heh I knew they had been debunked...
But it's fun to piss off the evolution crowd for me...
originally posted by: Cypress
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Heh I knew they had been debunked...
But it's fun to piss off the evolution crowd for me...
So you are admitting to being a troll....
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Ghost147
I agree that they aren't delusional or dumb. They are worse than that. They are smart enough to know they are spreading poison yet they do it anyway and for there own selfish reasons. They know they've built their houses on sand but instead of having the courage to remedy that they pull others down with them instead of standing on their own two feet. Like i said they are children cralling around afraid to walk on their own.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: mOjOm
Evidence trumps slander
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Ghost147
I agree that they aren't delusional or dumb. They are worse than that. They are smart enough to know they are spreading poison yet they do it anyway and for there own selfish reasons. They know they've built their houses on sand but instead of having the courage to remedy that they pull others down with them instead of standing on their own two feet. Like i said they are children cralling around afraid to walk on their own.
Perhaps for Oracle, but I think Raggadyman really believes his stuff. He wouldn't come off as so ticked-off at times otherwise.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I know you really believe your stuff, I can show you the evidence of your belief
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Talk it all up mr ghost
I would just love to see a jot of proof that evolution happened
That doesn't include a fly turning into a fly, not nearly good enough imho
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Though I have been down the rabbit hole of your links and read only assumptions
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Kinda like the words I read in the opening post, makes evolution sound more like a superstition
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Care to explain those words scientifically or you just want to lecture people some more
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
Neither have you
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
Just information that is based on assumption like the OP, it is make believe and you offer it as support.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
I can make stuff up, I could link other sites but it doesn't make them true.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
Just like all your links, they are at best a poor guess
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
They are religios drivel created by men
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
I can draw a pretty good picture of a monkey and a man and an arrow between them and say that evolved to this, that's my proof, you would believe the theory, you do, you just don't accept it was a monkey
For proof you show me the picture
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
Look everyone, evolution in progress, here is a fly, we tested and bread it over generations and now it's a,
FLY
Shazam, real evolution proof, a fly is now a fly
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
How about I just have my fun and poke holes in all the lies that I see offered
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Ghost147
I don't want to argue stupidity, just highlight it
originally posted by: Raggedyman
One of the reasons I enjoy it so much is how easy it is to tear down your castle of pooh
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Here is a simple thing for you to consider
Evolution is a pretty baseless science, until real solid evidence is offered I will show the fallacious nature of that evidence
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I don't believe in evolution and you will just have to accept that
originally posted by: Raggedyman
If solid evidence is offered I will be the first in line stating I was wrong
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I am not selling anything just pointing out the fraud in what others are selling
originally posted by: Raggedyman
You can call me names, say I am dumb, think I am a 12 year old girl in a party dress, whatever, I wil still be here explaining why I think the evidence offered is bunk
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Now how about those words in the op that say that the belief offered is just assumption
Care to elaborate on that?
Care to explain how assumption is scientific evidence?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
As for the issues with c 14 dating, if you think it's an exact science then you are, well I just suggest you study the issues, as should everyone who wants the truth