Iowa Caucus Discussion.

a reply to: Kali74

I will do that ,but you understand the caution when a career politician calls himself anti Washington.

a reply to: Tearman

A coin toss, are you joking?

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Tearman

A coin toss, are you joking?

It has happened before in Iowa..

a reply to: Tearman

666? Sanders is the Antichrist - Confirmed.

Wait, THEY ACTUALLY USE COIN FLIPS? That's totally f*cking BULLSH*T. Coins aren't a perfect 50/50 split, since one side is slightly heavier than the other. (And they can be tossed in such a way that they always land on a certain side.)

a reply to: shooterbrody

Absolutely but it's readily available to find out if he actually means it.

a reply to: clay2 baraka

That is absurd!

a reply to: Kali74


A coin toss?

In a election?

where they flipped a coin, they had tie between Clinton and Sanders supporters, but an odd number of delegates, so assigned the odd one "randomly".
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: muse7

Hillary has earned her disdain... Personally, I hope she loses... she represents what is wrong with OUR government, is she alone? Hell no...

All sides of the aisle, all those who live off OUR tax money, there to represent US... be it Left or RIght.. have betrayed the folks...

It's easy to spot those who profit on those who allegedly represent US.... they show up and defend what is indefensible ...

They protect the very folks who could give a rat's ass about those they spend millions to buy a vote...

96.4% reporting...

Clinton 676SDE 50%

Sanders 672SDE 50%

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: Kali74


A coin toss?

In a election?

The Iowa caucus process designed by the parties are a joke. It needs to be a straight-up vote, but they play silly games to weed-out the lower-tier candidates.

a reply to: Tearman

That... Is just so stupid. Even if both flips resulted in Sanders support, it's still so unimaginably stupid. At the very least they should have used a more random method than a coin flip.

Especially since it's something so easy to rig. I can flip a coin and have it land on a certain side 10 times in a row. At the very least, I can make it have a hell of a lot higher chance than the 0.098% chance it *should* have.

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: Tearman

That... Is just so stupid. Even if both flips resulted in Sanders support, it's still so unimaginably stupid. At the very least they should have used a more random method than a coin flip.

This coupled with the possibly inaccurate recount in Des Moines, which could have shifted the delegate count -1 from Clinton, +1 to Sanders.... these small things could just have been enough to tilt the razor's edge balance toward Sanders.

a reply to: Tearman

Still...

a reply to: Kali74

25 year in DC
No "Sanders" bill that changed anything

He voted against the Iraq war....good
He voted against the patriot act...good
Others voted the same way

He was chairman of veterans affairs......that was quite a scandal ....does he take any responsibility for that ?

Where in 25 years is the BERN everyone is fired up about? He is a long tenured failure IMHO.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Yeah draw a name out of hat at least lol.

96.6% reporting

Clinton 679SDE 50%

Sanders 675SDE 50%


.....

So 3 coin tosses now. Clinton won them all. Guess luck is on Clinton's side. At the current count that'd be enough to put Sanders ahead by +2 if the coins had landed opposite.

wow... just heard on FNC by one of the GOP pundits...

The establishment lost, their candidates lost.. Bush, Christie & Kasich...


Are you friggin kidding me? Kasich was an establishment choice...?


Shielding their real choice.. Rubio..

Don't fall for that please

So far 3 coin toss's all for Hillary.... don't like this. Twitter is exploding with wtf coin toss?

97.1% reporting

Clinton 682SDE 50%

Sanders 678SDE 50%