China Just Released True Color HD Photos Of The Moon

a reply to: Swills

Nice sharp photos, why can't we get this kind of sharpness from Mars photos?

a reply to: WeRpeons

Are you kidding?

How did they get Kubrick to edit the photos since he has been dead for awhile?

like this?




a reply to: WeRpeons

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Swills

China Just Released True Color HD Photos Of The Moon

SO the true color of the moon is grey...the Apollo pics were right.

If those pictures look grey to you, adjust your monitor.

And yes. My monitor is color corrected.

a reply to: DuckforcoveR

That's a nice one. However, I would like to see more sharp close ups of photos that could put some of those Mars rock conspiracies to rest.

a reply to: Phage

Are you kidding?

No, I would just like to see more sharper Mar's close-ups to put the Mar's rock conspiracies to rest.

originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Phage

Are you kidding?

No, I would just like to see more sharper Mar's close-ups to put the Mar's rock conspiracies to rest.

Ok. But that's not what you said before.

a reply to: Phage

With a new Mars conspiracy photo popping up every month, you would think NASA would want to prove there is nothing to these questionable rock formations. Why not move the rover in closer and take a sharper picture? It just seems like there's just enough blur to make a person's mind question if NASA is trying to hide something.

What about the so-called tower on the moon? Why hasn't NASA or China taken a clear sharp photo of that supposed anomaly? Just doesn't make sense to me. Inquiring minds want to know.

a reply to: WeRpeons

Why hasn't NASA or China taken a clear sharp photo of that supposed anomaly?

In that particular case? Because there is no "anomaly." It's a photographic flaw. There is nothing there to take a photo of.

So we're going to the Moon, but we aren't taking any UV cameras, UV film , UV filters or an astronomical telescope so all we have are these over-exposed pics of rocks, which, surprise!! we already knew were there.

What's the point of over-exposed pics of rocks?

a reply to: Mianeye

Why'd it take several years? Isn't their processing technology up to speed with NASA's? You'd think they'd have got the shadows right in that amount of time.

a reply to: Maverick7
So China can say; "We were here."
I guess.

a reply to: Swills

I can't believe that they were stoopid enough to release this image, which clearly shows the extent of the deception.



You can thank me later, for now, it's important we get this conspiracy rolling, and quickly too Swills.

Cheers

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

How did they get Kubrick to edit the photos since he has been dead for awhile?

According to what I've learned around here this is just proof he's not dead.

originally posted by: strongfp
That little robot in the first picture did some donuts on the moon!

But didn't raise any dust.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Swills
And you're all wrong. It's made of cheese.
SCIENCE, people.. SCIENCE.,

Wensleydale, if I'm not mistaken!

a reply to: Phage

The radio dish appears to be flapping in the wind.

a reply to: Swills

The horizon looks so weird! I'm guessing optical illusion and whatnot are due to our atmosphere, and since there is no atmosphere on the moon that is why it looks so different? No wonder people for years thought the horizon was photoshopped...you have to admit the horizon looks different than an earth horizon.

The moon's surface is lit up by the Sun, but the "sky" is pitch black...well I guess there is no sky on the moon. I can't believe they haven't invented a camera with a shutter speed to match what human eyes can see standing on the moon. Human eye sight can see the stars correct while standing on the moon?

a reply to: Swills
I thought the craters would be bigger than that...