It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Finally! Someone else is talking about no IG during Hillary's tenure at State Dept.---about time!!

page: 11
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 26 2019 @ 12:22 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

The ENORMOUS meaning behind Obama not wanting an Inspector General in Hillary's State Department did not occur to me in 2016.

But here we are 3 years later and...OMG....We now know why!

It was the same reason why Fidel Castro didn't have any Inspector General equivalents in his government apparatus.


posted on Oct, 26 2019 @ 12:30 AM
WoW !!

Fun to look back at "what came true" and "what didn't" !! 😃

posted on Oct, 26 2019 @ 12:40 AM

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: butcherguy

Guess we have to do what I've been saying all along......wait and see.

I'm not a lawyer and cannot make any specific claim, but perhaps it's not a crime unless it was actually classified information.

It's unclear whether the talking points themselves contained classified information. Typically, talking points are used for unclassified purposes (e.g. speaking with the media). But in some cases, the material contained in such memos may still be sensitive -- especially if the report originates from intelligence agencies.


So her guilt is still not cut and dry.

Hell-O World ? 😃

new topics
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in