It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: onequestion
Anything is better than this corporate oligarchy.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Leonidas
He's not following the same rules as everyone else.
"The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.
To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem." --- Douglas Adams
originally posted by: onequestion
Anything is better than this corporate oligarchy.
originally posted by: Kitana
a reply to: ipsedixit
I missed the part where Trump promised to dissolve the constitution and run the country through autonomous rule.
I did not miss however, that he said it is important to the citizens of this nation, that we begin to enforce laws for the benefit of the citizenry. Something our government SHOULD have been doing all along.
I did not hear him say anything about race, only that as Americans we need to do what it best for Americans to ensure a better future for our children and not worry about how others conceive of that. Since all Americans are of such varying races, there is no racial agenda, but an agenda which would benefit all citizens and no one else. Something that is the consideration of any nation on earth.
Illegal immigration is a detriment to all Citizens of the United States, no matter where there country of origin. How fair is it to the one who did everything necessary to come into this country legally, when he had to follow all the rules and another person does not have to. Laws which apply to one, need to apply to all equally.
When we arrest someone for theft, do we then say we will not put him in jail and excuse him of his crime because he has a family? No. We say he broke the law and for that he must face the punishment and that it was to him to consider the consequences of his actions prior to committing that crime.
Saying that while at war with terrorist organizations such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda that we need to stop immigration of people who might possibly have affiliations with those groups until which time we can lean how best to vet those prospective immigrants, is saying this country needs during this time to be protected and we should do all we can to protect our citizens. This is the responsibility of government, and what we have government for. This is not a racist policy, as these groups have no racial ties but rather ideological ties.
To cry fascist, is to speak in ignorance.
The term plutocracy is generally used as a pejorative to describe or warn against an undesirable condition.[3][4] Throughout history, political thinkers such as Winston Churchill, 19th-century French sociologist and historian Alexis de Tocqueville, 19th-century Spanish monarchist Juan Donoso Cortés and today Noam Chomsky have condemned plutocrats for ignoring their social responsibilities, using their power to serve their own purposes and thereby increasing poverty and nurturing class conflict, corrupting societies with greed and hedonism.[5][6]
He might spring that on people. FEMA and the Patriot Act make that sort of thing easier than it ever has been.
Has he issued a list of his nominations for arrest? Should George W. Bush move to his estate in Paraguay right away?
One could say that you are stating a semantical argument. I think Trump has already been inciting hatred of Mexicans, Chinese and Canadians, all of whom he "loves", of course.
Americans never seem to want to carry their own freight. Successive administrations, going back over time, have elected to declare amnesties to illegal immigrants. This goes back decades, maybe thirty or forty years and several administrations, as I'm sure you know. The reason for that is not the great power of penniless immigrants. The reasons are home grown, mainly the lack of a reasonable minimum wage and a refusal to get tough with people who hire illegals.
Trump has stated that he will not raise the minimum wage. I think it is a fantasy to believe that Trump will do anything effective on illegal immigration. Americans are incredibly gullible about this sort of thing. They don't know who wags the dog.
Issues of crime and punishment in the United States are extremely complex. Illegal immigrants come into the United States because employers will hire them. There is no serious attempt to stop this flow of illegals, just as there is no serious attempt to combat the heroin or coc aine trades in the United States.
Trump supporters are easy game for him because, as George H.W. Bush so aptly observed, "Americans don't read". Americans don't know the dynamics of illegal immigration. Trump supporters think that illegal immigrants are responsible for illegal immigration.
It's religious discrimination. ISIS and Al Qaeda are creations of the CIA and NATO. Essentially they are mercenaries that have been used to fight the proxy wars of America and her NATO allies in Afghanistan, North Africa, Iraq, Syria, Kosovo and possibly other places I am not aware of (Pakistan, India?).
You have to be a pretty alert TV watcher to catch this drift. Reading is out, of course (per George H.W. Bush), but for Americans willing to go against the grain and do some research, there is plenty of material on the origins of ISIS and Al Qaeda.
originally posted by: Kitana
a reply to: ipsedixit
Could it backfire in that Trump does nothing he has said? Sure it could. But at the same time, unlike other politicians it has a better possibility of not backfiring. He is not a pre-purchased candidate; not beholden to lobbyists and has a well thought out plan that is implementable. I'll take the chance on him, before I'll take a chance on someone else.