It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't thing the footprint issue is a big deal as the conspiracy theory clip states because the suit probably had fitted soles not evident in the clip because they are removable.
Yes, people on this ball of dirt are still starving but some feel they need to spend a huge amount of money on restoring this suit.
originally posted by: Timely
a reply to: centarix
It happened. The whole world stopped to watch.
I was going to school at the time and here in Australia it was a very big deal.
We were a part of this historic occasion. The Parkes telescope was used to beam comms. back to mission control
when the ( not flat ) Earth rotated to such a point where the two hemispheres as well as opposite sides of the planet were needed to stay in touch.
I got to see it happen in glorious black & white and felt the sense of occasion. It was real.
Heck we even made a movie about it ! ( The Dish )
I do hope future doubters will find one of the existing on-going debates rather than trot out the same. Again.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
The real secret that no one is talking about is that the moon is flat.
Just raising awareness here, to think otherwise is ignorant.
Not only flat but made of cheese, too.
Universal astrophysicist and biologist Richard Dimburger, a leading proponent of the lunario formaggio theory, states in his new book, The Moon Rock Delusion: Evidence for a Cheese Moon, that the myths might not have been so wrong after all. “It turns out,” he says, “that our planet’s moon is just a piece of the Milky Way which broke off of the main body, contracted a rare strain of bacteria, and, at some point in time, turned into a solid green cheese.”
Thanks for taking the questions seriously. If that is the case then I should be able to find a video where one of the workers is shuffling directly to the left of the screen as at 53:40 while he is facing the camera, correct? The clearest mark where you can see one of the ghosts is 53:40 where its obvious a ghost person starting at the flag position, facing the camera, then shuffles left half over half of the screen.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: centarix
The short answer to all your questions is that the supposed transparency is due to different parts of the scene being present on different scans. In other words, if an astronaut is at point a on one scan, then moves to point b, the background visible at b when the astronaut was at a, will still be visible when the astronaut moves. When the scan catches up, it disappears, but by then the astronaut has moved again. This is why they always have ghostly outlines. The TV camera on Apollo 11 was a unique slow scan device.
“It turns out,” he says, “that our planet’s moon is just a piece of the Milky Way which broke off of the main body, contracted a rare strain of bacteria, and, at some point in time, turned into a solid green cheese.”