It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That guy is a FED plant.... he's showing all the rooms and doors... totally not foraging, he's just showing all the hiding places and where to raid if need be.
originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: imitator
Don't be stupid, unless you're intentionally trolling.
He's not a fed plant, David has been streaming as much as he can to document it all if the feds decide to raid so the world can see
If you'd been following events then you'd know that they're not actually staying inside the buildings, they're sleeping rough outside around a few cars they've parked up, so the feds are welcome to raid the buildings but they won't find anybody hiding
originally posted by: imitator
originally posted by: tweetie
The Oregonian
That guy is a FED plant.... he's showing all the rooms and doors... totally not foraging, he's just showing all the hiding places and where to raid if need be.
originally posted by: tweetie
originally posted by: imitator
originally posted by: tweetie
The Oregonian
That guy is a FED plant.... he's showing all the rooms and doors... totally not foraging, he's just showing all the hiding places and where to raid if need be.
I'm sorry, I have no idea of what you are referring to at the link. I posted the link to the home page of The Oregonian because that website has the most comprehensive collection of articles, videos and pictures concerning this whole event of any other website I've come across. As to what is featured on the home page at any given time, that changes.
You willfully choose to have no integrity and ignore the citations and fail to do your own diligence when someone points out you are wrong. You probably are a science denier also. Right?
originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: SkyNetBeware
Don't forget it's not like a sunday drive with the kids
He's just escaped from the feds, adrenaline is high, they're all panicked so probably distracting him, there's a bend and he's going pretty fast AND it's winter so maybe the road is a little icey, if no ice it's definitely damp so braking distance increases anyway.
Added to that we don't know what visibility was like on the ground, hell he could have even had a steamed up windscreen for all we know
All things considered he reacts pretty well to avoid the blockade, he probably didn't think there would be a blockade further up the road, if you watch as he drives the road twists like an S so he brakes on the first corner, veers into the center then as he crests the corner and the blockade comes into view he starts braking again.
Definitely not signs of a man intent on ramming through a blockade.
Really we have to ask what were the feds thinking setting up a blockade so close to the exit of an S bend, do it on a long piece of straight road
Really we have to ask what were the feds thinking setting up a blockade so close to the exit of an S bend, do it on a long piece of straight road
originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: SkyNetBeware
You willfully choose to have no integrity and ignore the citations and fail to do your own diligence when someone points out you are wrong. You probably are a science denier also. Right?
You have made many assumptions about alot of things in this thread and all I can say about that is the ones about me have been false. You then directly attack my character without any provocation. What does that say about yours? I have done my due diligence regarding Law and Statute for over 10 years yet you seem to think that posting a wiki link for me to read is somehow going to inform me of something I don't know. It was stated a few posts ago in a very clear way what the difference is but you chose to ignore that. I wonder why? For the record, no I am not a science denier. I love and embrace science but I do have an open mind and don't take science as the final word. Attack my or anyone else's character in this thread again and I will completely ignore you. If you choose to come down off your high horse and have a civil debate then I am all ears...
foolishly claimed
having a hissy fit
took the low road
originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: SkyNetBeware
I'll lay this out as simply and plainly as I can. I will not be providing links.
Our government known as the United States of America is a corporation as are most state, county and city governments. Corporations cannot make Laws so they make Codes and Statutes. The supreme Law of this land is the Constitution. Case Law follows and is exactly that. Period. End of story.
originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: SkyNetBeware
Why use a blockade so close to an S bend though when it can only potentially put the officers at risk of injury IF the car they're trying to stop decides to try and ram them ?
Doesn't seem to make sense to me, but procedure usually defies logic at times.
For instance they could have airlifted those concrete barriers in
Or they could have used a stinger to stop the vehicle
They did seem to make it more difficult than it could have been to stop the vehicle without causing a near death for the trooper jumping into the path of the pickup
That is the thinking that got finicum to put himself into a dangerous situation
The constitution explicitly gives the Feds the power to create laws (us code).
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: pteridine
Mr. Finicum made his choices. I don't agree with them, I think he was doomed to failure from the start, but I can also understand that he had no good choices either. I can also appreciate how he felt that was the
But Mr. Finicum cannot and did not force anyone else -- specifically, the Feds -- to do a thing. They made their own choices. And their judgment day will come. honorable and courageous thing to do. He put his life on the line and paid the ultimate price for his convictions.
If I dare you to kill me, are you gonna do it? What if I double-dog dare you? Triple-dog dare you??? Do you really believe any jury in this country would let you off for murder because you said, "She triple-dog dared me!!!"
originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: SkyNetBeware
Since you did not insult me that time, I will respond
That is the thinking that got finicum to put himself into a dangerous situation
It's not thinking, it's fact.
The constitution explicitly gives the Feds the power to create laws (us code).
Where exactly does the Constitution "explicitly" give that "power" to the "Feds"?
One more question: Do you know the difference between De Facto and De Jure?