It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Release full unedited video of Finicum shooting

page: 11
46
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yes I am directly talking the footage they released first, we should assume (well # I guess we shouldn't assume anything,anymore) that footage exists with sound within meters of the shooting. This only leaves more questions, do they want this conversation if so why?




posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: TechniXcality



This only leaves more questions, do they want this conversation if so why?

The conversation would continue no matter what they say or show.
There are, after all, claims that the video is faked.


edit on 1/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Honestly, what this video shows does not contradict the eye witness testimony from that girlZ

So what I'm wondering is, was she right about being fired upon first whole driving and then again when he got out of the vehicle?

The video does not give us the information we need to validate that testimonyZ



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:00 AM
link   


FBI Release full unedited video of Finicum shooting


This really goes to show that even with...ahem..the full unedited version....it is really hard to get a majority consensus on what actually happened....i really meant the truth



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:02 AM
link   
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

I have to wonder... Is everyone being facetious when they fail to admit even a remote possibility of the agents firing first without provocation?

And that idiot officer shouldn't have thrown himself in front of car so let's not bring that up.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Sure absolutely the die hards would remain steadfast, however the more objective and critical minds would be settled,as of now no one knows, so while the conversation would continue either way, fact would outweigh division based on agenda.
edit on 29-1-2016 by TechniXcality because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   
I never believed he was dragged out and shot execution style on his knees, but the being shot with his hands up is backed up by years of case evidence from Law Enforcement behavior, and this video as well.

Repost:

a reply to: Phage

Well there are plenty of video to prove such things. For instance in this one, this poor bastard is shot in the gut at the 54 second mark, by a jackass wielding what appears to me to be a tec9. It predictably has either an FTF/FTE after the first shot, because lets be honest its a #ty gun used by street thugs that dont know any better because it looks cool in movies.



Considering his hands were up until that point, I would say it make sense. They continued to shoot him when he dropped his hands and used this to say that is when they chose to shoot. The officer was already in the woods ready to fire.


The "Freedom fighting/Moderate Rebel" does the same in this video when troops hit him.


It happens instantly, and you do it without thinking.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   
a reply to: TechniXcality

I'll be convinced of the truth when they produce audio.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:11 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

ya think.......im just being a little facetious here but when was the last time you threw yourself in front of a moving vehicle ?...forget about the snow and ice and all...
...

This whole war on the people is not going to end well,i will teach my kids to be strong,stand up for what they believe in



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:13 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion



And that idiot officer shouldn't have thrown himself in front of car so let's not bring that up.

I guess there's no chance he thought that Finicum was going to crash into the roadblock.
Or are you saying he was suicidal?


edit on 1/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So he throws himself in front of a moving car?

That's stupid ok. They are out in the middle of nowhere there's other options.

It's really stupid.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:15 AM
link   
The eye-witness account of the daughter so far seems to be the most credible. She saw it while the other guy put some hearsay together piecemeal — after interrogation no less.

The federal government got what they wanted, while a family man with 10 or so children, a day or two before his birthday, "committed suicide by cop", "got what he deserved", probably "wanted to take some cops with him", probably sometime after he had his hands in the air.
edit on 29-1-2016 by TheTory because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:16 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion


So he throws himself in front of a moving car?
He was running before the car turned off the road. Or close enough so he didn't see it turn.

I don't get your point. Do you think he was suicidal?


edit on 1/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: onequestion



And that idiot officer shouldn't have thrown himself in front of car so let's not bring that up.

I guess there's no chance he thought that Finicum was going to crash into the roadblock.
Or are you saying he was suicidal?



That's just stupid man. The guy clearly veered off the road up on the snow bank to specifically AVOID the roadblock. The officer moved toward the vehicle, trying to put himself in front of it, not away from it. But hey, at such a low speed, a little tap is all the reason they need to claim vehicular assault and waste the guy- even if he DID come out with his hands in the air and DID NOT charge the cops. MURDERERS.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: TechniXcality

I'll be convinced of the truth when they produce audio.


If the audio does not have hundreds of shots you will claim it is fake.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:20 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueAmerican



But hey, at such a low speed, a little tap is all the reason they need to claim vehicular assault and waste the guy- even if he DID come out with his hands in the air and DID NOT charge the cops. MURDERERS.

You're doing it again.

BTW, it was not low speed. A lot of snow flies when he gets into it.


edit on 1/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:21 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueAmerican

I thought that was obvious but apparently people can't think for themselves.

Seeming to be smart and being smart are apparently two different things.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Did you just pick out some pointless detail and make an issue out of it again a while ignoring the rest of the post?

Is that really how you think?

Maybe it's useful on your job or something but applying that kind of logic to everything all the time is insane.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:24 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

When the audio comes out I'll know for sure that the girl was telling the truth or she couldn't tell the truth because she was so stressed out she didn't know what was going on.



posted on Jan, 29 2016 @ 02:25 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion




Did you just pick out some pointless detail and make an issue out of it again a while ignoring the rest of the post?

You mean the detail that shows that the truck was not at a "low speed?" That the man who ran would have been seriously injured had he been hit. That the idea that he did so intentionally is absurd.



new topics




 
46
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join