It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Darkpr0
And besides Lockheed, who exactly has produced 5th generation aircraft to set the definition with?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Darkpr0
So we can't understand what something really is until after it's gone? Then what's the point of definitions at all for generations?
As for fifth gen, there are several slightly different definitions of it, all agreeing that stealth, both radar and IR, sensor fusion, advanced datalink capability, avionics and engines are key components.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Darkpr0
Then get rid of all definitions. There are things that don't fit other generations too, so we might as well throw the entire book in the garbage using that logic.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Darkpr0
And yet, according to you, even fourth gen aircraft can't be categorized because they're still flying. So there's no point in having any kind of identification system since we can't use it until they retire the aircraft in question.
Which we won't understand until the 5th Gens are done flying.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
If that's true for fifth gen, it must be true for fourth gen as well,
which means the entire system is useless, as we can't classify anything until it's done.
So we only know what 1-3 are. Which, again, means that any generation system is useless to use.
The entire point is to identify families of aircraft, but since we can't know what anything fits into until it's done flying, that means that we can only use it to look at historical aircraft, not current aircraft.
As for 4+, and 4.5, etc, what would you call aircraft that don't fit into either generation? They have to go somewhere.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Darkpr0
You know, screw it, you're right. Fifth generation doesn't exist yet, because we don't know what it can really do.
originally posted by: drwire
a reply to: Darkpr0
if you apply that rule, from the point of view of russian aircrafts, to define what is a fifth-generation aircraft then the F-22 Raptor could easily be a sixth generation aircraft.