It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: LSU0408
No, and no offense, but you have terrible comprehension skills.
Ahh, But offense was meant to be given.
Murdochs Fox is the republican party mouthpiece, and why would democrats debate them?
The candidates are meant to debate each others opposing viewpoints, answering a public question in an assembly, and the fox team adjudicate the debate, not participate in debating opposing viewpoints with democrats.
are the dems cowards for not wanting to debate Fox's team
Shame, I had to point out the basics to you.
No, my post was simply about being a coward for walking away from a debate held by Republicans, and seeing if the same standard was held for those that aren't Republicans. You didn't comprehend what I was saying, the same thing you did to me two times yesterday. So no, I really wasn't trying to offend you and wanted to tell you that before I stated my reply.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: LSU0408
No, and no offense, but you have terrible comprehension skills.
Ahh, But offense was meant to be given.
Murdochs Fox is the republican party mouthpiece, and why would democrats debate them?
The candidates are meant to debate each others opposing viewpoints, answering a public question in an assembly, and the fox team adjudicate the debate, not participate in debating opposing viewpoints with democrats.
are the dems cowards for not wanting to debate Fox's team
Shame, I had to point out the basics to you.
No, my post was simply about being a coward for walking away from a debate held by Republicans, and seeing if the same standard was held for those that aren't Republicans. You didn't comprehend what I was saying, the same thing you did to me two times yesterday. So no, I really wasn't trying to offend you and wanted to tell you that before I stated my reply.
I suggest you reflect on your delivery rather than attack my comprehension then.
originally posted by: CoBaZ
makes me wonder what channel will cover the Trump wounded warrior fundraiser. I would watch that instead.
originally posted by: matafuchs
He should agree to Cruz and have a debate at the Wounded Warrior Project event. Tomorrow night...
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: matafuchs
Man, that would take ALLLLLLLLL the eyes off of the GOP debate and make revert them to the Trump/Cruz debate... That would be pretty effin awesome.
I was reading about this and I think, he was going to do it, then FOX put out that joking news report, Trump read that and he was on edge about doing it anyway and that sealed the deal.
There was another interesting article written a while back on how Trump was a FOX daringly because of ratings until the first debate, when they essentially betrayed him
aving seen the mistreatment by FOX heaped on Ron Paul in both 2008 and 2012, FOX is about as establishment Neo-con as it gets.
The fact that this fight exists tells me the GOP does not want Trump which means the establishment does want Trump,
And that would be a TRUMP/PAUL presidency.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
Reagan skipped the last Republican debate in Iowa, then he won the POTUS in a landslide.
"FLASHBACK: Ronald Reagan Skipped Last Debate Before IA Caucus – Went on to Win in Landslide"
www.thegatewaypundit.com...