It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, he was shot for resisting arrest. Calling it an execution is jumping to conclusions in lieu of evidence.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: hellobruce
How about an investigation into the BLMs acquisitioning of property which they in turn use to generate a profit from by contracting mining and drilling rights out to big mining and drilling companies?
.
originally posted by: onequestion
Have any of you thanked the protesters for highlighting a major issue that we have with an out of control rogue agency using mafia tactics to extort resource rich land that they then profit off of from land owners across the north western United States?
.
originally posted by: onequestion
Have any of you thanked the protesters for highlighting a major issue that we have with an out of control rogue agency using mafia tactics to extort resource rich land that they then profit off of from land owners across the north western United States?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: tweetie
Thats subjective, without audio we can't hear any thing anyone shouted or when shots initially were fired.
After he was far enough away, that is when he reached for his weapon, or feigned to, so they would be forced to shoot him. He knew what he was doing.
Convenient that. If they were so just in shooting him, where is the multiple dash cam and agent cam angles, with audio?
What if they asked him to reach?
Why did he come out with hands raised? He knew there were twenty guns on him. He knew he couldn't win.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: onequestion
I was wondering why they didn't occupy the methane leaking Frackushima in San Fernando instead:
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: DelMarvel
I've done the necessary research to conclude that the BLM takes land and then rents drilling and mineral rights out to companies like Genie Energy for 20% of the profit.
If you did any research and stopped jumping to conclusions you would have found out for yourself.
Now I'll leave you too it.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: tweetie
It's perfectly plausible he wanted to die and it's also perfectly plausible that they were already shooting as stated by Victoria Sharp.
In order to know the truth we need to hear audio.
Everyone else is jumping to conclusions.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: tweetie
He was wanting to go home to tend to his lost cows.
If he had actually wanted to go home he would have just gone home. But where would the media attention he craved be if he did that?
originally posted by: hellobruce
If he had actually wanted to go home he would have just gone home. But where would the media attention he craved be if he did that?
On Tuesday, Finicum's protest came to an end. He and several fellow occupiers were pulled over on Highway 395, a law enforcement official said. According to The Oregonian, they were headed to the city of John Day, where they were set to participate in a community meeting set up by local residents.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: hellobruce
If he had actually wanted to go home he would have just gone home. But where would the media attention he craved be if he did that?
He WAS on his way home.
The roadblocks stopped him.
They knew he was leaving !!!!