It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary’s team copied intel off top-secret server to email

page: 3
31
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 08:56 PM
link   
If hildabeast skates on this there is no accountability in this country. If any military person did this they'd be court marshaled no doubt. I hope she dies a slow painful death.




posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Annee
All I get out of all these Hillary threads is how afraid people are of her.
If she's that powerful here, she's bound to put fear into the rest of the world.

This is not a good thing; as most of the rest of the world (in its unreasonableness now) being patriarchal would dismiss her completely. Not exactly a Margaret Thatcher (was of a formidable intellect)


Like Hillary or not --- to dismiss her intelligence is ignorant.

Intelligence measured to what yardstick identified?



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:00 PM
link   
I think you all pretty much made my points.

BTW - I have not said I support Hillary for president.

I have said before -- I think she's the most qualified.

That does not necessarily make her the best or right choice.
edit on 24-1-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Hillary has redefined the word "Intelligence".

In a sinister and cloak & dagger way.




posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Qualified would include integrity, which she has none.
So she is the least qualified by any stretch of the imagination.

I would agree with you she is not the right choice, on all accounts.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Annee

Qualified would include integrity, which she has none.
So she is the least qualified by any stretch of the imagination.

I would agree with you she is not the right choice, on all accounts.


Integrity, hmmmmm ----- that can certainly depend on ones perspective.

I did not say she wasn't the right choice. That is not what I said.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

This goes to verify a reply I had in another thread about politicians only being able to be well known and upstanding citizens.

To us Hillary is a vile criminal and many of us are wondering how she hasn't had to post bail to continue campaigning.

The information being presented in this thread further confirming that the woman operates in a way to absolve her of any criminal conduct she may spearhead or be involved in.

edit on 24-1-2016 by gpols because: Typo Women to WomAn



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

Integrity, hmmmmm ----- that can certainly depend on ones perspective.



The majority of voters find her to be dishonest, and not trustworthy,
which is the opposite of having integrity.

noun
noun: integrity

1.
the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.




I did not say she wasn't the right choice. That is not what I said.


ok.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:16 PM
link   
double post.

edit on 24-1-2016 by burntheships because: system double post



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: gpols
a reply to: vethumanbeing
This goes to verify a reply I had in another thread about politicians only being able to be well known and upstanding citizens.
To us Hillary is a vile criminal and many of us are wondering how she hasn't had to post bail to continue campaigning.
The information being presented in this thread further confirming that the women operates in a way to absolve her of any criminal conduct she may spearhead or be involved in.

Not only does she believe she is above the law *all of her potential constituents are idiots* but thumbs her nose at those imposing the law of this nation; the Constitution: the DOJ. She believes herself (UNTOUCHABLE) yet/that is being investigated by her own party appointed. She is a security risk; playing fast and furious with national secrets/light bulb baked brownies on her 'EasyBake' Oven Personal Server.
edit on 24-1-2016 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   


Hillary’s team copied intel off top-secret server to email

Without her knowledge of course......(her defense)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog



Hillary’s team copied intel off top-secret server to email

Without her knowledge of course......(her defense)


Actually some emails indicate she gave Zaa Ordaaz.




posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Annee

Qualified would include integrity, which she has none.
So she is the least qualified by any stretch of the imagination.

I would agree with you she is not the right choice, on all accounts.


Not really. You don't always need integrity to do a task. That is your opinion of what a person should have.

Just pointing that out.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: gpols

The information being presented in this thread further confirming that the woman operates in a way to absolve her of any criminal conduct she may spearhead or be involved in.


Factual information? No, what we have here is opinion and judgement based on unproven speculation.

I believe there was a thread about Hillary being investigated by the FBI.

Statement from Hillary: "The FBI has not contacted me".



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Annee

Qualified would include integrity, which she has none.
So she is the least qualified by any stretch of the imagination.

I would agree with you she is not the right choice, on all accounts.


Not really. You don't always need integrity to do a task. That is your opinion of what a person should have.
Just pointing that out.

What is the opposite of integrity to define one manipulated by others to gain the highest office in this country?



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Seeing how we are on a conspiracy site and all this gives us certain liberty to speculate and in the nature of ATS, I'm willing to say that Hillary is the head Lizard of the Reptilian clan and her half backed attempts at email security is all apart a devious plot to sell us out and create a one world government.

On a serious note, I don't know anyone that believes in honesty, truth, and justice can support her. She defies the morals she claims to uphold.

But her playing fast and lose with Top Secret intelligence is why I went off on my tangent earlier. You don't necessarily have to give intelligence to an adversary interested in it, you could just make it readily available. Hence "private email server".



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: gpols
She defies the morals she claims to uphold.



Where are your proven facts?



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: gpols

The information being presented in this thread further confirming that the woman operates in a way to absolve her of any criminal conduct she may spearhead or be involved in.


Factual information? No, what we have here is opinion and judgement based on unproven speculation.

I believe there was a thread about Hillary being investigated by the FBI.

Statement from Hillary: "The FBI has not contacted me".



The FBI doesn't usually contact individuals under investigation. They contact you when they have their case built and they officially charge you. What is fact is that the FBI is working to get information off of her private email server. Which would mean she's under federal investigation.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: gpols

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: gpols

The information being presented in this thread further confirming that the woman operates in a way to absolve her of any criminal conduct she may spearhead or be involved in.


Factual information? No, what we have here is opinion and judgement based on unproven speculation.

I believe there was a thread about Hillary being investigated by the FBI.

Statement from Hillary: "The FBI has not contacted me".



The FBI doesn't usually contact individuals under investigation. They contact you when they have their case built and they officially charge you. What is fact is that the FBI is working to get information off of her private email server. Which would mean she's under federal investigation.


Are you FBI?

Do you work with the FBI?

Do you know for a fact the FBI is doing what you stated?

You wanna hear when the FBI busted into my house, threw my boyfriend on the floor and handcuffed him? That's real fact.


edit on 24-1-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom

Not really. You don't always need integrity to do a task. That is your opinion of what a person should have.

Just pointing that out.


Aside from the Constitutional requirements, which would include the framers
intent including concerns of integrity.

Considering that Hillary is already on it for her own case, I think she counts
on it being a thing of the past, definitely. Or...maybe it was just a slip
of the tongue.




new topics

top topics



 
31
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join