It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
.
I DO however think we should recognize what happened, and tack a charge in manslaughter on to the rapist's sentence. I'd say murder, but he didn't intend for a pregnancy to result.
As is well known, anarchists use the terms “libertarian”, “libertarian socialist” and “libertarian communist” as equivalent to “anarchist” and, similarly, “libertarian socialism” or “libertarian communism” as an alternative for “anarchism.” This is perfectly understandable, as the anarchist goal is freedom, liberty, and the ending of all hierarchical and authoritarian institutions and social relations.
That defenders of the hierarchy associated with private property seek to associate the term “libertarian” for their authoritarian system is both unfortunate and somewhat unbelievable to any genuine libertarian.
The facts are somewhat different. As Murray Bookchin noted, “libertarian” was “a term created by nineteenth-century European anarchists, not by contemporary American right-wing proprietarians.”
Conservatism finds the natural occurrence of society, our longstanding customs and laws, as a more qualified, tested, and empirical approach to what a society is, as opposed to some abstract conception of what a society should be.
originally posted by: TheTory
Conservatism is the most difficult political idea to rationally defend (part of its charm in my opinion), but only because it is more difficult to defend our institutions and customs than it is to criticize and destroy them, and erect some fantasy in their place.
As someone who is irreligious, it requires for me a lot of tolerance in the Voltarian sense to accept the existence of religious orthodoxy, and thus what I would deem irrational beliefs, but the free exchange of ideas, and the freedom to associate, is paramount to any naturally spontaneous society. We must conserve the secular customs and institutions that have served us well in this regard. Theocracy is not a conservative principle.
Conservatism finds the natural occurrence of society, our longstanding customs and laws, as a more qualified, tested, and empirical approach to what a society is, as opposed to some abstract conception of what a society should be. For conservatism, the means justify the ends, as opposed to the ends justify the means. The "means" is always the people, who in something like Communism, become the material with which to build societies, but only ever to disastrous consequences. This has proven to be true, given the failed political experiments of the 20th century, which resulted in the deaths of millions to no good effect.
A conservative believes (in my opinion) that he defends the cultural, social, territorial, and spiritual wisdom of their fellow man, as they pass from past to present to future. As such he defends their fellow man.
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
a reply to: FyreByrd
Leftness oozes from your quote
That defenders of the hierarchy associated with private property seek to associate the term “libertarian” for their authoritarian system is both unfortunate and somewhat unbelievable to any genuine libertarian.
Private property needs no hierarchy. Private property is as natural as human speech and social cooperation.
Most educated people think that the Left is the impartial center, if taken at their word. Big government leftism has been the default media and educational position since the Spanish American War in the US.
The facts are somewhat different. As Murray Bookchin noted, “libertarian” was “a term created by nineteenth-century European anarchists, not by contemporary American right-wing proprietarians.”
Libertarian was coined to distinguish individualist Classical Liberals from socialists because the politically pandering socialists were stealing the word Liberal away from the Classical Liberals.
Now it seems the Socialists are coming for the term Libertarian. Very Orwellian . Socialists take away the words so that thought cannot be communicated easily.