It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But anecdotaly it SEEMS that most of the "good cases" were over by 1989 or so.. it almost seemed like a "hard stop".
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: JimOberg
Very interesting Jim.
Are you aware of any re-entries over the Hudson Valley (especially in 17th - 24th March 1983 period)?
originally posted by: mirageman
.....
I really don't know what the object over Indian Point was, never mind what it was doing. ....
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: JimOberg
I do like that you are arguing one
Very specific point....without vast,
Handwaving claims (insert
Miracle here) like most people
Do.
Kev
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear...
Anyway....that's my public service
Announcement. I windup wearing
Both hats at once in this forum. Kev
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: mirageman
.....
I really don't know what the object over Indian Point was, never mind what it was doing. ....
I don't think you are justified in referring to the sighting as 'the object'. You're slipping a conclusion into the opening 'facts'.
originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
I concede the point, well argued. Just be cautious to apply ANY
words that carry with them side-implications that then can attach
barnacle-like to the original nebulous referent.
That's what worried me about using 'object'.
Would 'stimulus' serve better? Or simply 'cause'?