It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cologne Imam Says ‘Things Will Happen’ If Women Wear Perfume And Dress Half-Naked

page: 12
78
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 03:53 PM
link   
What I took from the imam's words is "muslim men are unable to control themselves, and they are therefore no better than common stray dogs."

Folks around here have a particularly final way of dealing with stray dogs.

Islam does not deserve the protection of a real religion, because it is not one. islam is a religio-socio-legal/political system, a way of life, and any relationship with any deity involved in it is purely incidental. It does not deserve the protections due to a religion until it becomes one, and foregoes the political aspects inherent in it.




posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

I think that politicians are beholden to...politics. What IS politics really? It is the ability or the will to overlook certain things that one finds objectionable in order to be able to cohabit in a way that is conducive and not detrimental to society. I am not sure that blaming one particular president helps here, but I am not American.

In my opinion ALL politicians have forgotten what they are there for, what their raison d'etre is. That is to make life better for the people they serve.

In cases such as these, where there is apologism for breaking fundamental laws agreed upon by society, politicians should use the power invested in them to correct such things. Regardless of whether it is politically correct to do so they should heed the people, and if the people are wrong, so be it.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:00 PM
link   
To be clear, it should be the people that run the politicians, not the politicians that run the people.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Jonjonj

I will always attack the politicians of the USA first and foremost. First...because they embarrass me personally by making the world think that their idiotic views are those of the people. And second...when they betray their oath and the country by becoming a terrorist sympathizer. But you are correct, this is much larger than the USA and all the world's "leaders" have some level of blame in this mess. For the most part, the people know what is required to correct or survive the situation when it presents itself face to face. They just don't have the balls from behind their smartphones and electric, self-parking cars.

Short story...American has been neutered. Partially by laziness and partially by Dr. Obama.


(post by MagesticEsoteric removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: blupblup

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
No one deserves to be rapes, however, considering that guys love seeing naked women as opposed to dressed women more...it only makes sense that if a guy or girl (lesbian) had a proclivity to rape...they would go for the one who is wearing the least amount of clothes. More attractive and less work. Besides the media has conditioned us to believe that half clad women, have more fun. There's always going to be rapists out there, but its partially up to the female to not be so "inviting".



NOTHING.... literally NOTHING that a woman wears (or doesn't) Invites rape.
These kind of comments and the comments of the moronic Imam are disgraceful.



It baffles me in this day in age that this concept still has to be explained to ANYONE!

Thank you for having a sense of damn reason.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: operayt

Sorry mate but just logged in to point out the fact you are dead wrong about us not going over there telling them how to run things,

Did you not see what happened in Iraq, Afgahnistan, Lybia, Syria , etc etc.

Now I am not defending this foolish rape happy fool , and I know we personally didn't do it, but our glorious leaders sure did!

Don't forget that we ain't innocent entirely!



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

How curious is it that Politicians (Yes, a capital p) the world over seem to agree, whilst their represented masses, and I know that sounds socialist, just sit and watch as they get richer and richer, and ignore people more and more?

The whole idea of politics is ridiculous nowadays, we are on the verge of becoming self representative by means of information and technology and at the same time we are becoming more and more subjected to political will outside our control by the old and entrenched guard.

Shame on those politicians who value more their own advancement than what they should actually work for; The people's best interest.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 04:42 PM
link   
I absolutely realise that the above post is off topic, sorry.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...
edit on 21-1-2016 by mekhanics because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...


How about starting a new thread on the subject...huh?

This is just derailing the topic of the OP.

I don't disagree with what you are saying but, throw that topic into the mix and the OP is busted up and completely derailed.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: mekhanics

Did he do it in the name of his religion? Nope Did he do it because of his culture? Nope.. Did he do it because Roman Catholicism breeds hatred towards women? Nope..he did it because he could because he wanted to and because he was clearly a power hungry freak who thought he could do what he wanted....Now if you were to say that most Roman Catholics were spreading across Europe at this point in time, doing this en mass because their religion permits it then that would be different but they're not but another group is for the above mentioned reasons.

Equating 1 man's actions with a large mass of people isn't representative nor a valid point



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...


You seem to be missing the point completely. Jimmy Saville was a sex offender, and caught, and absolutely he should have been caught earlier.

Should his religion have protected him? Are you protecting pedophiles? What are you saying?

Are you saying that because it is Islam we should shhh the fkkkk up? What are you actually saying here?



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...




How can you say ironically "this is not news worthy" when you link to a mainstream newspaper website?

This is old news. Jimmy Savile has been front page news being a sexual predator in British newspapers since 2011.


edit on 21 1 2016 by Debunkology because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
a reply to: mekhanics

Did he do it in the name of his religion? Nope Did he do it because of his culture? Nope.. Did he do it because Roman Catholicism breeds hatred towards women? Nope..he did it because he could because he wanted to and because he was clearly a power hungry freak who thought he could do what he wanted....Now if you were to say that most Roman Catholics were spreading across Europe at this point in time, doing this en mass because their religion permits it then that would be different but they're not but another group is for the above mentioned reasons.

Equating 1 man's actions with a large mass of people isn't representative nor a valid point


You just proved how much that post would derail the thread and OP. lol



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...


You seem to be missing the point completely. Jimmy Saville was a sex offender, and caught, and absolutely he should have been caught earlier.

Should his religion have protected him? Are you protecting pedophiles? What are you saying?

Are you saying that because it is Islam we should shhh the fkkkk up? What are you actually saying here?


Don't feed the derailing posters.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: MagesticEsoteric

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: infolurker

Breaking news:

A Roman Catholic "Jimmy Savile" raped children as young as nine while working at BBC'

www.independent.co.uk...

But, that is not news worthy. Let see which religion is the best, and how to stir things up, taking things out of context..

Meh ...


You seem to be missing the point completely. Jimmy Saville was a sex offender, and caught, and absolutely he should have been caught earlier.

Should his religion have protected him? Are you protecting pedophiles? What are you saying?

Are you saying that because it is Islam we should shhh the fkkkk up? What are you actually saying here?


Don't feed the derailing posters.


Sorry but what? I have spent the last few hours demonstrating how a certain poster has been using this thread for a fear based agenda...what again?

Ah it is ok, I see what you did there. Or tried to do there anyway.
edit on 21-1-2016 by Jonjonj because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: blupblup

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
No one deserves to be rapes, however, considering that guys love seeing naked women as opposed to dressed women more...it only makes sense that if a guy or girl (lesbian) had a proclivity to rape...they would go for the one who is wearing the least amount of clothes. More attractive and less work. Besides the media has conditioned us to believe that half clad women, have more fun. There's always going to be rapists out there, but its partially up to the female to not be so "inviting".



NOTHING.... literally NOTHING that a woman wears (or doesn't) Invites rape.
These kind of comments and the comments of the moronic Imam are disgraceful.



If they are dressed the same as those hookers on the side walk, the same as those women dancing around poles at a gentlemen's club,.....then they are asking for trouble. Those jobs are in the sex industry, and quite frankly, it's hard to tell who is just another woman...and who works the men at the sex bar. I said, that there is no excuse for rape, but men see women like that, and to them she is just another woman begging for that kind of attention.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but people judge and judge harshly in this world. There are men in this world who have very little control over their sexual impulses, if they see some woman at night who reminds them of a hooker or an exotic dancer, they will act on that impulse. Who do you think they will rape first, a girl that is dressed sexy? Or a girl who is dressed from head to toe? The fact is, there are things like this in the world and a reason for them happening, and the truth can sometimes be a bitter pill to swallow.

I'm NOT sorry, that I choose to look at reality, in it's ugly face. That PC crap doesn't fly with me.
edit on 21-1-2016 by IlluminatiTechnician because: Grammar



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 06:17 PM
link   
There will be no getting these rape gangs out of Europe. It's done.



posted on Jan, 21 2016 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
If they are dressed the same as those hookers on the side walk, the same as those women dancing around poles at a gentlemen's club,.....then they are asking for trouble. Those jobs are in the sex industry, and quite frankly, it's hard to tell who is just another woman...and who works the men at the sex bar. I said, that there is no excuse for rape, but men see women like that, and to them she is just another woman begging for that kind of attention.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but people judge and judge harshly in this world. There are men in this world who have very little control over their sexual impulses, if they see some woman at night who reminds them of a hooker or an exotic dancer, they will act on that impulse. Who do you think they will rape first, a girl that is dressed sexy? Or a girl who is dressed from head to toe? The fact is, there are things like this in the world and a reason for them happening, and the truth can sometimes be a bitter pill to swallow.

I'm NOT sorry, that I choose to look at reality, in it's ugly face.


The truth is, you are talking absolute BULL#.

A man that cannot control his sexual desires and acts on impulse needs to be locked up. I am a man with a very high sex drive. But I can control myself and not act like an animal.



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join