It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2016 @ 01:15 PM
link   


Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

The Justice Department's own public disclosures undercut the president's privilege claim, Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled.

By Josh Gerstein

01/19/16 01:16 PM EST

A federal judge has rejected President Barack Obama's assertion of executive privilege to deny Congress access to records pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, a gunrunning probe that allegedly allowed thousands of weapons to flow across the border into Mexico.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled Tuesday that the Justice Department's public disclosures about its response to the so-called "gun walking" controversy undercut Obama's executive privilege claim.

"There is no need to balance the need against the impact that the revelation of any record could have on candor in future executive decision making, since any harm that might flow from the public revelation of the deliberations at issue here has already been self-inflicted," Jackson wrote. "The Department itself has already publicly revealed the sum and substance of the very material it is now seeking to withhold. Since any harm that would flow from the disclosures sought here would be merely incremental, the records must be produced."

Jackson said she wasn't questioning the propriety of Obama's claim of privilege, but ruling that the claim could not be sustained in view of other information the Justice Department had released on the topic, chiefly an Office of Inspector General report released in September 2012.
...


Read more: www.politico.com...

I would not put your hopes up that this will end up with either the government disclosing everything, or end with the impeachment of President Obama.

While the Judge is to a point making the administration accountable, this only seems to be a farce.

Notice how the judge stated, and i quote:


...
"This ruling is not predicated on a finding that the withholding was intended to cloak wrongdoing on the part of government officials or that the withholding itself was improper," the judge wrote.
...


Read more: www.politico.com...

After all, Judge Jackson is an Obama appointee.

This will only lead to a small slap in the wrist of the President, even if that, and then "case close".

Sad times we live in indeed.




posted on Jan, 20 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

good, I'm glad the Judge is sticking it to the BS claim of "Executive Privilege" pshhh NOPE!


and sorry to be "that guy" but www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 20-1-2016 by FamCore because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse



Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim


IMESHO, this should have been added to the US Constitution long ago. Presidents from both parties love to fall back upon it whenever something goes against their preferred path.

'Executive privilege' is simply sickening.



 
8

log in

join