It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An e-cigarette exploded in a man's mouth, knocking out a tooth and leaving him with burns.
The man was smoking in his bedroom in Telford, Shropshire when the cigarette substitute blew up.
An ambulance crew went to Blakemore, Brookside and took the man to hospital.
Malcolm Stevenson of Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service said: "It's very unusual, it may even be unique. There's no report anywhere that we can find of a similar incident."
originally posted by: EnigmaAgent
I read the other day that E-cigs might cause a condition called popcorn lung. Something to do with the additives in the liquid. Flavours and such. Cant find the article.
Reports of high levels of a potentially deadly chemical in e-cigarettes have been greatly exaggerated and are part of a trend toward the demonization of vaping, according to a leading tobacco control expert.
Diacetyl, a chemical linked to the severe respiratory disease bronchiolitis obliterans, commonly known as “popcorn lung,” was found in 39 of 51 flavored e-liquids examined by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Media outlets across the world ran with headlines pumping up the risks of e-cigarettes, such as “Vaping Could Give You ‘Popcorn Lung‘” and “E-cigarettes linked to incurable lung disease.”
But according to Dr. Michael Siegel, a Professor in the Department of Community Health Sciences at Boston University School of Public Health, the Harvard study has several “glaring omissions,” and the level of diacetyl exposure from vaping compared with smoking differs by “orders of magnitude.”
Siegel, who has spent 25 years in the field of tobacco control, pointed out the study published in the journal “Environmental Health Perspectives” didn’t mention that regular cigarettes contain diacetyl, and in far greater amounts than any e-liquids.
Looking at the numbers, Siegel found “daily exposure to diacetyl from smoking is therefore 750 times higher, on average than exposure to diacetyl from vaping.” Vapers are, on average, exposed to a daily dose of nine micrograms of diacetyl, compared with 6,718 micrograms for smokers.
But the evidence gets worse for sensationalist headline writers and anti-vaping activists. “The ‘worst’ e-cigarette tested produces diacetyl exposure that is 85 times lower than that of the ‘worst’ cigarette tested,” Siegel wrote. The e-cigarette liquid with the highest level of diacetyl in the Harvard study exposed vapers to 239 micrograms against 20,340 micrograms for heavy smokers.
Bronchiolitis obliterans is known as “popcorn lung” because it was identified in workers who inhaled the artificial butter flavor used to make microwavable popcorn. Some cases of popcorn lung have been so damaging that patients have required a lung transplant.
But vapers have little reason to worry about the relatively trivial levels of diacetyl in e-cigarettes compared to tobacco cigarettes.
Not only is the risk of diacetyl exposure far lower for vapers than for smokers, but according to Critical Reviews in Toxicology, “smoking has not been shown to be a risk factor for bronchiolitis (popcorn lung).”
The findings, published in Environmental Health Perspectives last week, run counter to beliefs that vaping is "95% less harmful than tobacco," reports IFL Science. Rather, certain compounds found in the chemicals of the some-7,000 vape flavors that exist on the market might actually cause irreversible loss of lung function and eventual transplant.
The term "popcorn lung" comes from a case in the early 2000s, where workers in a microwave popcorn factory were exposed to dust, particles, and not-so-delicious buttery fumes. Many workers developed a respiratory illness that resembled bronchiolitis obliterans, a form of lung disease characterized by fixed airway obstruction.
To investigate flavoring chemicals in e-cigs, a Harvard team led by Joseph Allen analyzed the fumes from 51 types of flavored e-cigs from different leading brands. They discovered at least one of three chemicals–diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin, which are found in butter flavoring–in 47 of the 51 flavors tested. Yes, even in the aforementioned Alien Blood.
originally posted by: EnigmaAgent
I read the other day that E-cigs might cause a condition called popcorn lung. Something to do with the additives in the liquid. Flavours and such. Cant find the article.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
The findings, published in Environmental Health Perspectives last week, run counter to beliefs that vaping is "95% less harmful than tobacco," reports IFL Science. Rather, certain compounds found in the chemicals of the some-7,000 vape flavors that exist on the market might actually cause irreversible loss of lung function and eventual transplant.
The term "popcorn lung" comes from a case in the early 2000s, where workers in a microwave popcorn factory were exposed to dust, particles, and not-so-delicious buttery fumes. Many workers developed a respiratory illness that resembled bronchiolitis obliterans, a form of lung disease characterized by fixed airway obstruction.
To investigate flavoring chemicals in e-cigs, a Harvard team led by Joseph Allen analyzed the fumes from 51 types of flavored e-cigs from different leading brands. They discovered at least one of three chemicals–diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin, which are found in butter flavoring–in 47 of the 51 flavors tested. Yes, even in the aforementioned Alien Blood.
Just look up popcorn lung and vaping disease, lots of results.
Anyone who inhales anything except for clean oxygenated air, for supplemental 'purposes' should surely expect SOME lung damage, no matter how minute. It's just common sense. Since vaping is still a new thing, it will take years to see the effects.
originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: Ismynameimportant
these e vigs seem to be dangerous... I've read many stories where these have blown up!
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
I'd be interested in just a small handful of these many stories you read.
Any rechargable battery is dangerous. Your phone, your fitbit, your ipod/ipad/laptop, your bluetooth....they all use the same battery technology.
No doubt a damaged battery can be more dangerous than one that is not....but the risk would be the same: rechargable batteries have an inherent volatility. And we still stick them in our ears.