It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is it possible to give somebody cancer with an injection?---Remember Martha Mitchell?

page: 1
17
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 11:33 AM
link   
Martha Mitchell was the wife of John Mitchell, US Attorney General under President Richard Nixon.

She was feisty and outspoken and controversial. When Watergate broke, she started calling reporters about her fears that her husband was being set up as the scapegoat. She claimed to have heard some things and she wanted to expose it.

Then, her name and reputation got dragged through the mud. It was "leaked" that she drank a lot and may have been paranoid.

She was kidnapped. Her kidnappers have never been found. Think about that! The wife of the Attorney General of the United States of America was kidnapped!

She claims she was forcibly held down and injected with a cancer-causing drug. To this very day, this remains controversial.

Is it possible to give somebody cancer with an injection?

There is even something called the Martha Mitchell Effect (en.wikipedia.org...)


The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient's perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.


edit on 19-1-2016 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   
I haven't heard about this story. Guess I have some researching to do. Thanks



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

perhaps they simply made a witches brew of dozens (or more?) of types of harmful cancer-causing substances, which, when combined are almost sure to cause cancer.

I also hadn't heard about this story - time to do some more digging. S & F OP good find



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Well the CIA outed their famous "Heart Attack" gun in front of Congress in 1975.

So anything goes as they say.

CIA secret weapon of assassination - Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975 - New World Order Report


A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video below. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.

The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.

The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.

The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.





posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 12:38 PM
link   
OP, you are going to love this.
Lee Harvey Oswald's girlfriend talks about how her connection to him was research he got her involved with where she developed a virus that would create a fast acting cancer to kill Castro with.



edit on 19-1-2016 by CraftBuilder because: repaired link.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: CraftBuilder

Thanks.

I will watch that video when I have more time. There are so many strange coincidences that don't really pop out at you until years, if not decades, have passed and emotional reactions have died down.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Well the CIA outed their famous "Heart Attack" gun in front of Congress in 1975.

So anything goes as they say.

CIA secret weapon of assassination - Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975 - New World Order Report


A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video below. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.

The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.

The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.

The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.






Very interesting indeed. I think this was mentioned as a possibility when Andrew Breitbart had his "heart attack". No way to prove it, I guess...for now.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Sure it is possible and you don't need some heavy chemicals. Just inject something that destroys cells and make a grow of cells, something like grow hormone.

Something like protein elixir with radioactive grow hormones.

Or if you want to kill some in organic way, feed them with meat from animals that are given grow hormone and antibiotics, apparently this makes miracle for a cancer.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

No, you cannot inject cancer into a person who is generally healthy: the immune system would attack those cells as foreign bodies and destroy them. Basically cancer cells need to communicate with the 'host' in order to get access to blood vessels; without the blood supply the cancer doesn't grow. As soon as the body recognizes the foreign cancer cells, it will start attacking them and will not communicate, it will simply start destroying them.

To succeed you would need exceptional circumstances, I think: to match a specific cancer to a specific host with the perfect 'environment' and conditions, to suppress the person's immune system... and even so it could fail. Cancer is not infectious, it would be a lot easier to kill someoby with a deadly virus.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   
Yes it's possible to give someone cancer.

Those saying not, but still avoiding certain viruses and substances for fear that they will cause cancer need to think about their stance.

Certain molecules and chemicals are known to increase the likelihood of cancer. Radioactive isotopes being absorbed up into the body can cause cancer in target areas depending on the element.

Certain viruses are known to be correlated to increased rates of certain types of cancers.

And it wouldn't surprise me if certain chemical signals in a concoction in addition to a cultured growth of a persons cells based on prior collections of their DNA can almost coax the development of cancer cells in a persons body when the signals say "do this" and the cells are not foreign.
edit on 2016 by BlubberyConspiracy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Martha Mitchell was the wife of John Mitchell, US Attorney General under President Richard Nixon.

She was feisty and outspoken and controversial. When Watergate broke, she started calling reporters about her fears that her husband was being set up as the scapegoat. She claimed to have heard some things and she wanted to expose it.

Then, her name and reputation got dragged through the mud. It was "leaked" that she drank a lot and may have been paranoid.

She was kidnapped. Her kidnappers have never been found. Think about that! The wife of the Attorney General of the United States of America was kidnapped!

She claims she was forcibly held down and injected with a cancer-causing drug. To this very day, this remains controversial.

Is it possible to give somebody cancer with an injection?

There is even something called the Martha Mitchell Effect (en.wikipedia.org...)


The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient's perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.



Judith Vary Baker said a cancer injection was the project she and Lee Harvey Oswald were working on just before JFK was assassinated. Allegedly they were going to use it on Castro.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Well I did a research and it seems that she is not the only one, claiming this fantastic story on cancer injections, Five south America presidents including Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, said that American agents may be inducing the disease in South American leaders by feeding them or injecting them with an unspecified substance. The State Department rejected Chavez’s insinuation on Thursday. Can you give someone cancer?

But the truth is that the answer is not.


Not reliably. Injecting cancerous cells into a person isn’t enough to give him the disease—the abnormal tissue has to penetrate and grow in other areas of the body. If you injected someone with live cancer cells, his immune system would almost certainly attack and destroy the foreign tissue. In theory, secret agents might be able to induce cancer in a leftist South American president with a severely weakened immune system. Or perhaps they could harvest tissue from him, expose it to a carcinogen, and then reintroduce it into his body. As far as the Explainer knows, however, these techniques have never successfully caused cancer in a human.


www.slate.com...

On the Chavez issue I believe is propaganda, but on the poor lady Martha Mitchell is a case of mental issues and -paranoia, unless is more that we don't know.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   
I remember watching a documentary about Bob Marley and it was claimed he was injected with something that caused his cancer.

Apparently he injured his foot playing a game of football, or soccer if you prefer, and a Dr was called as a result. An unknown physician attended and injected an unknown substance into his toe. A few months later he was diagnosed with cancer of the very toe he received the injection.

Now it may have been the toe injury itself that caused the cancer, but when there's a good conspiracy to be had.
edit on 19/1/16 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I remember watching a documentary about Bob Marley and it was claimed he was injected with something that caused his cancer.

Apparently he injured his foot playing a game of football, or soccer if you prefer, and a Dr was called as a result. An unknown physician attended and injected an unknown substance into his toe. A few months later he was diagnosed with cancer of the very toe he received the injection.

Now it may have been the toe injury itself that caused the cancer, but when there's a good conspiracy to be had.


Another good possible conspiracy to mull over....Arlen Specter, Ted Kennedy, Beau Biden, William Casey, and Robert Novak all died of the same highly aggressive glioblastoma multiforme/brain cancer and all were connected to some of the most major political scandals in the last 50 or so years.

There aren't that many politically-connected deaths from this type of cancer. It's a pretty interesting coincidence.




edit on 19-1-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Martha Mitchell was the wife of John Mitchell, US Attorney General under President Richard Nixon.

She was feisty and outspoken and controversial. When Watergate broke, she started calling reporters about her fears that her husband was being set up as the scapegoat. She claimed to have heard some things and she wanted to expose it.

Then, her name and reputation got dragged through the mud. It was "leaked" that she drank a lot and may have been paranoid.

She was kidnapped. Her kidnappers have never been found. Think about that! The wife of the Attorney General of the United States of America was kidnapped!

She claims she was forcibly held down and injected with a cancer-causing drug. To this very day, this remains controversial.

Is it possible to give somebody cancer with an injection?

There is even something called the Martha Mitchell Effect (en.wikipedia.org...)


The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient's perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.



Yes, I'd say it's true. A family relative got an injection. The injection site became swollen. She had it checked out by a doctor and it was a cancerous lump.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
I knew someone once that said he was injected during an arrest and afterwards he had cancer. Interesting topic.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: BlubberyConspiracy

People who avoid those substances do so because they increase your chances of getting cancer, not because those things will give you cancer like a virus or bacteria will give you disease.

A cancer is the product of something going wrong in your cell's genetics that cause them to divide out of control and in a faulty manner. So what something has to do to "cause" cancer is create genetic damage and not every genetic flaw is cancer causing.

So it would be really inefficient to inject someone with a carcinogen, even less so than with a pathogen.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 04:17 PM
link   
Squirt a tiny little bit of plutonium into somebody and see what happens.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 04:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

They are as likely to die of radiation poisoning as they are to survive and develop a cancer as a result, actually, depending on the dose, more likely to die of radiation poisoning.

If radiation alone were a sure cause of cancer, all of the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have died of cancer rather than simply having an increased incidence of it.



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
Of course it is OP.

They're called vaccines.




top topics



 
17
<<   2 >>

log in

join