It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Iran Nuclear Deal----- A Safer World, or The Grand Appeasement!

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
The United States and its Western Partners have now implemented The Iran Nuclear Agreement, and Iran has or soon will have access to 150 billion dollars in oil revenue with which to export terrorism to its terrorist organizations and proxies throughout the Middle East, including those bent on Israel's destruction such as Hamas.

This agreement allows Iran to cheat and continue to enrich uranium at underground facilities while utilizing its own inspectors to handle allegations of continued attempts to produce nuclear weapons. Iran has also been given at least 30 days to remove the evidence of such activities prior to any restoration of the prior sanctions imposed on it by the U.S. and the West.

Even if the so called "deal" were to work as well as it possibly could per its own terms, Iran would still be fully able to become a full fledged nuclear world power within the next ten to fifteen years, during which time it can and will strengthen Hamas and its other surrogates and sponsors of terrorism.

Quite frankly The U.S. and President Obama through Secretary of State Kerry and Former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has been negotiated out of its pants, socks, and under garments by the theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran, all for the purpose of fostering our president's misguided idea of a legacy of world peace through weakness.

Not only has Obama turned his back on the only democratic buffer nation in the M.E. and increased the real existential threat against them, but the president and his negotiators have also insured a Nuclear Iran within a decade or so which will be able to fire nuclear warheads at our own country as well as at Israel via intercontinental ballistic missiles.

It is obvious that President Obama has kicked the can down the road for a future president to handle and actually has increased, rather than decreased an eventual war with a much stronger Iran.

On a number of occasions in the recent past, Iran has been clearly guilty of acts that violate the terms of even this pathetic agreement, without any repercussions or challenge. Can there be any further doubt of Iran's intentions now?

Without further delay, this agreement must be set aside and Congress must reimpose all of the prior sanctions against Iran while striving for a far better agreement with this theocratic repressive regime before it is too late for Israel and too late for the West and our own nation as well.

The Iran Nuclear agreement is nothing less than the Grand Appeasement of our times.
edit on 18-1-2016 by kendix1960 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
But the real exporter of terrorism in the middle east is Saudi Arabia. Having a powerful buffer against Saudi Arabia IS good for world peace. Iraq used to be the buffer against IRAN and Saudi Arabia but we destroyed that nation and created ISIS instead.

I don't think we have to worry about nuclear bombs from IRAN. Israel already has 100 or so Nuclear bombs with the capability to hit any target in IRAN within minutes. Neither Russia or China or France or the Uk or the EU or Jordan or Canada or Australia or any other country on earth wants Iran to launch nukes and I think Iran would be hit pretty hard without us ever having to do anything about it.

But again, Saudi Arabia is our real enemy, why doesn't anyone care about Saudi Arabia? Where did the 9/11 Hi Jackers come from, where did the San Bernardino shooters come from right before the shooting, where did Osama Bin Laden come from, who funds Isis and Boko Harem, who won't even let women drive?



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:47 PM
link   



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

We need Saudi Arabia as a coalition Partner against Isis right now as well as a buffer against Iran. They are a bad player, I agree, but we have to be careful not to shoot ourselves in the foot by alienating the Saudis when we still need a Sunni Muslim coalition to oppose the Radical Islamic Terrorists. BTW, Why can't Obama or Hillary utter those words?



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960




Not only has Obama turned his back on the only democratic buffer nation in the M.E. and increased the real existential threat against them


Democratic buffer ? , guess that's one way to put it.
I welcome the deal but then I have no dog in the fight.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960




Without further delay, this agreement must be set aside and Congress must reimpose all of the prior sanctions against Iran


But I thought there were many countries, not just the US which were imposing sanctions on Iran. Is that incorrect?



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

Really???



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

This deal was done by five other counties...

Were they all looking to just appease Islam and bite their thumb at Israel too?




This agreement allows Iran to cheat and continue to enrich uranium at underground facilities while utilizing its own inspectors to handle allegations of continued attempts to produce nuclear weapons. Iran has also been given at least 30 days to remove the evidence of such activities prior to any restoration of the prior sanctions imposed on it by the U.S. and the West.

Sources please.
edit on thMon, 18 Jan 2016 15:08:40 -0600America/Chicago120164080 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:06 PM
link   
a reply to: FamCore

That is correct, but we took the initiative to push the deal and influenced our partners to join in. Of course the other world powers had their own sanctions against Iran as well. The problem now is that they, too, have lifted the sanctions thereby making it a much more difficult and complex process to restore same as Iran continues to cheat and violate the deal!



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

The OP has no sources because they just made up this BS off the top of their head...



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

And the practical solution to Iran's ambitions were what?

There were two 3 choices:

1. Make a Deal
2. Go to War
3. Do Nothing.

You don't think option 1 was the better of those 3 choices? I like how conservatives wanna complaint and bitch about the deal, yet present to viable alternative to it, at all.

~Tenth



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

The road to hell is paved with good intentions!



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

ISIS poses more of a threat to Iran than it does to the US that explains why their military actively fights against them and why they have urged both Russia and China to fight against them.


edit on 18-1-2016 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: kendix1960
a reply to: Sremmos80

The road to hell is paved with good intentions!


Cool, a comment that had zero to with what I asked.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: tothetenthpower

How about the option of leaving the sanctions intact and forcing Iran to make a better deal in the first place while we could still operate from a position of strength? All that has happened is that a very tangled web has been weaved.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

The road to peace requires trust and understanding not bombs.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

If Obama and company is right, then nothing will happen and the world will turn and turn.

If they are wrong, then a terror-sponsoring nation will have a nuke and millions will die.

Lets all hope they were right on this because the alternative might be a nuke in a US city.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

To clarify, all of the Western powers intended to weaken Iran and make war less certain but unfortunately just the opposite has occurred. Perhaps not in the immediate future, but a decade or so down the road. Just my opinion!



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: kendix1960

The MSM and all the other political puppets have been warning of doom and destruction from a nuclear Iran for 20 years now.

Oh, Iran is 10 yrs from having the bomb, 6 months from the bomb, 5 years from the bomb, 18 months from the bomb.

Still no bomb.

I'm much more concerned about Isreal's nukes and Pakistan, Korea and who knows what nukes are floating around the former Soviet Block.



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: kendix1960
a reply to: amazing

We need Saudi Arabia as a coalition Partner against Isis right now as well as a buffer against Iran. They are a bad player, I agree, but we have to be careful not to shoot ourselves in the foot by alienating the Saudis when we still need a Sunni Muslim coalition to oppose the Radical Islamic Terrorists. BTW, Why can't Obama or Hillary utter those words?


You miss the point. Iran hasn't really harmed us in anyway yet. Saudi Arabia blew up two giant towers in New York City and Killed 12 people in San Bernardino. I think you're choosing the wrong side.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join