It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stevieray
Hey, I'm sorry for anybody who lives on the edge of disaster. But unless you have a physical or mental handicap, rather than "one paycheck from disaster".....you are really one associate's degree or one certificate away from better times. Or some overtime, or a second job, or a cheaper flat or car. Whatever happened to people coming up with their own solutions to their own problems ? Why is today's person only gonna scream and spit and swear at people who work harder, plan better, and make rational decisions ?
You know, you could live without a 100-200 per month phone, or 100-200 per month cable TV, or 300 per month car. You can still have all of those things for 1/4 that money, with the slightest effort to make it so. Today's struggling people won't even consider that. Today's classic selfish stance is "oh, why should I have to move from where I love it, to a place that's paying 25.00 an hour". Yeah, got it. The 25.00 / hr is supposed to just come to you, not you to it. Yes, that's really the outlook of today's poor. I keep hearing how unfair it is that a career burger flipper can't pay the rent in downtown NYC. That's Godawful childish logic.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: TrueBrit
Once you have such obscene wealth, the only thing left to spend it on is obtaining more. And thus, the cycle continues.
originally posted by: stevieray
There is no such thing as obscene wealth lol. Money is not tangible, it doesn't do obscene things any more than guns chase people around and shoot them.
It's obscene only in the minds of the jealous, or the lazy who need to blame the successful instead of their own sloth.
As a rule, massive wealth has been reinvested in society in various ways. Gates and Buffet and the Koches today. Vanderbilt and Mellon and the Rockefellors and Kennedies of earlier times. There are hospitals and institutes and foundations all over America given by these folks.
But boy, doesn't that just bust up the meme of "evil" and "obscene" wealth. NO FAIR !!
I think all the charities and other philanthropic organizations that benefit from the generosity of the wealthy would disagree.
There is no such thing as obscene wealth lol. Money is not tangible, it doesn't do obscene things any more than guns chase people around and shoot them.
It's obscene only in the minds of the jealous, or the lazy who need to blame the successful instead of their own sloth.
As a rule, massive wealth has been reinvested in society in various ways. Gates and Buffet and the Koches today. Vanderbilt and Mellon and the Rockefellors and Kennedies of earlier times. There are hospitals and institutes and foundations all over America given by these folks.
But boy, doesn't that just bust up the meme of "evil" and "obscene" wealth. NO FAIR !!
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: stevieray
It isn't really that convoluted. If your wealth is 30% of the country's total wealth, then you should be providing 30% of its taxes. Not complicated.
I think all the charities and other philanthropic organizations that benefit from the generosity of the wealthy would disagree.
Money isn't usually given to charities for purely philanthropic reasons. Tax benefits. Sometimes they own the charity they give the money to.
There is no such thing as obscene wealth lol. Money is not tangible, it doesn't do obscene things any more than guns chase people around and shoot them.
I don't think you know what obscene means. Please try again, once you do.
It's obscene only in the minds of the jealous, or the lazy who need to blame the successful instead of their own sloth.
So everyone who disagrees with you is either jealous or lazy, huh? Well, I'll go ahead and say that everyone who disagrees with me is conceited and stupid.
Forgive me, extremely stupid.
Not exactly a good method of argument, is it? Just makes you want to disagree that much harder.
Please, try again.
As a rule, massive wealth has been reinvested in society in various ways. Gates and Buffet and the Koches today. Vanderbilt and Mellon and the Rockefellors and Kennedies of earlier times. There are hospitals and institutes and foundations all over America given by these folks.
All things that would exist independently of the existence of such people. And please, the Koches? They're one of the key players in destroying America.
But boy, doesn't that just bust up the meme of "evil" and "obscene" wealth. NO FAIR !!
I've already stated that I don't really care about people like Oprah, because her wealth isn't obtained and maintained by destroying the lives of others, and the planet itself. It is not her head that I want on a pike.
Do you remember that "leave Brittney alone" girl? Guess who you're reminding me of, for some reason. Don't worry, I don't think our words are that hurtful to multibillionaires like Trump and such.
Get back to me when Bill Gates has contributed the equivalent of 1,540,000 years of hard work to our society. I'd say I'd wait, but I don't think even memories will be left by the time he could even get close to that.
Still, it's become quite obvious to me that some of these guys could be eating children and you'd still be defending them (that is hyperbole, though they do kill thousands of them indirectly), so whatever. I'm no longer going to bother with you.