CIS study: UN is choosing who will be NEW Americans!

a reply to: SLAYER69

Yeah. Let them stinky refugees rot. Especially the Syrians. Right?
Not our problem.


BTW, you think the US is the only contributor?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SLAYER69
Yeah. Let them stinky refugees rot. Especially the Syrians. Right?
Not our problem.

Putting words in my mouth eh?

So unlike you. The point being is that's a lot of cheese to fork over for only about 2,000 peeps .

a reply to: SLAYER69

The point being is that's a lot of cheese to fork over for only about 2,000 peeps .

The point being that there a lot more than 2,000 people involved. Why focus on only those that are accepted to the US? Why forget about the rest? The millions of others?

originally posted by: Phage
Why focus on only those that are accepted to the US?

Because I'm a US citizen whose Government is spending my money faster than I make it, [Has been for decades]

Why forget about the rest? The millions of others?

What were you just about to say about other countries contributing?

originally posted by: SLAYER69

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SLAYER69
Yeah. Let them stinky refugees rot. Especially the Syrians. Right?
Not our problem.

Putting words in my mouth eh?

So unlike you. The point being is that's a lot of cheese to fork over for only about 2,000 peeps .

We talking about millions of people being taken care of not just screenings. And that money is over the course of 5 years. We could just abandon everything that makes us American and let them die I suppose. We spent 1.7 trillion blowing up iraq. at least that 4.5 billion over 5 years is doing some good.

a reply to: MrSpad



I'd like to see a higher yield of refugees, not just 2,000. I'm glad we are helping people but like all things done through the UN there seems to be a lot of pork.

I'd love to see a real world break down of money spent vs objectives achieved.


ETA: A bigger bang for my buck.

a reply to: SLAYER69

What were you just about to say about other countries contributing?

www.unhcr.org...


But who said anything about just countries?
www.unhcr.org...

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

How about we take that extra from the defense budget.
You know the one that pays for those men and women to go over and get their face blown of and then create the refugee issue.

And yet we see pathetic "appeals" for sympathy like this .....

Makes some people wonder who is getting rich from these scams.

UN runs out of money to feed Syrian refugees




Where's Kofi Annan when we (don't) need him the most !!

Your link is broken.
But I'm willing to bet that it has nothing to do with UNHCR.

originally posted by: Phage
Your link is broken.
But I'm willing to bet that it has nothing to do with UNHCR.

check again

pathetic appeal

a reply to: SLAYER69

I'd love to see a real world break down of money spent vs objectives achieved.

www.unhcr.org...

a reply to: xuenchen

That's sorta my point.

As a US tax paying citizen I have every right [God Given or Constitutional] to question how my money is being spent. Regardless of whether on Bombs or Butter.

a reply to: xuenchen

check again

Read what you post.

The World Food Programme (WFP) said on Monday that it "immediately needs" at least $64m in December alone to support the displaced Syrians now living in neighbouring countries such as Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey.

a reply to: Sremmos80

All big government failures.

a reply to: Phage



Like those countries are flat broke?

a reply to: Phage


Cool, FYI

a reply to: xuenchen

Like those countries are flat broke?

What?

The WFP is not the UNHCR.

originally posted by: Phage

The WFP is not the UNHCR.

Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey combined don't come even close to having $18,000,000,000.00 + debt as we do.

Let them and a few others foot more of the bill.

a reply to: SLAYER69

Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey combined don't come even close to having $18,000,000,000 + debt as we do.

How does their combined GNP compare to ours?