It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only way to conserve the angular momentum is to change the axis on which she rotates, effectively re-centering her center of gravity.
Yes. That is why the conservation of angular momentum requires that the rotational velocity decreases when a skater extends her arms. And, because moment is conserved, rotational velocity will increase when she pulls her arms in.
Except for Newton's first law of rotational motion, which states that a body will continue to spin at the same angular velocity unless there is an external rotation torque applied, or there is a change in it's distribution of mass.
You need to lookup of the formula for angular momentum. It is conserved, so when the radius changes, the velocity must.
Like I said. Unless there was a "counter balance" rock of equal mass in her opposite hand, her angular velocity will change, thereby changing her angular momentum.
Me too. Where's r?
I wonder how that happened.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: JohnathanDoe
Me too. Where's r?
I wonder how that happened.
Angular momentum. Want to try again?
Not that it has anything to do with a change in the figure axis affecting the rotational axis.
No. You do the math. You figure out which variables must change.
Add in r and show us all how it changes the fact that one side of the equation decreases but the other doesn't.
It was not a tangent, but it was you who said:
And you're the one that struck off on a tangent to argue momentum.
Which is wrong.
she is changing her mass distribution, which alters her angular velocity, which alters her angular momentum.
And you decided to go off on a tangent and argue that her momentum doesn't change. Except it does.
The uneven mass distribution acts as an outside force to your closed system...
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: namelesss
You cannot find a single instance to illustrate my point?
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: namelesss
a reply to: Harte
Dear Harte, even if the dates continue to get incrementally smaller and smaller, and we can even say 'consistently' (for argument's sake) the dates still do not seem to get any younger, generally.
This reflects only the accuracy of dates determined through less accurate means
originally posted by: namelesss
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: namelesss
a reply to: Harte
Dear Harte, even if the dates continue to get incrementally smaller and smaller, and we can even say 'consistently' (for argument's sake) the dates still do not seem to get any younger, generally.
This reflects only the accuracy of dates determined through less accurate means
I was offering an observation of what I observed. I did not lie.
originally posted by: namelesss
It has already been admitted here that ages, whether greater maximally, or minimally, continue to point to older.
originally posted by: namelesssAnd asked for thoughts, not a lynching.
originally posted by: namelesssAll 'means' are "less accurate"!
I am bored and disgusted with this topic.
I offered some possible food for thought and all you guys can do is to pee on it!
Whatever.
I won't make that error again, here.
Just because You would say that Milan has a closer to Continental than Sub-Tropical climate does not make it so. It is listed as Sub-Tropical with a Continental influence. Montreal gets more precipitation in the winter than Milan does throughout the entire year as a result of the Alps effectively cutting off storm fronts. You showed evidence of snow in Milan, that doesn't mean that it has snowfall averages on par with Montreal though. The 3 locations I cited do in fact have different localized climates from one another and Milan is by far, the most mild of the 3.
originally posted by: namelesss
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: namelesss
You cannot find a single instance to illustrate my point?
Right back atcha.
Before I leave this thread, I offer the following in evidence and support to what I observed;
www.google.com...