It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kansas To Shun Refugees From Every Country In The World - repost

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

Which federal failure/incompetence are you referring to exactly?


Doesn't matter.

Any Federal failure should not be mitigated to the States.

It's pure petty jealousy.

The immigration policy failures are not the States' problems.





posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

Yea, it will definitely go no where since the states don't have the authority to enforce immigration laws, but it is still a disturbing thing that should be pointed out. These are the people we vote for (well Kansans voted for). We need to pay attention to what they are doing when they have the job.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Where has the federal government mitigated a failure to the states? Are you implying that because Brownback took measures into his own hands that constitutes what you are saying?



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Unless he plans on setting up state border crossing guards on every single road leading into and out of Kansas, he can't possibly stop them from coming there and he's just pissing straight into the wind like the idiot he is.

And what about this being done by executive order?

I thought that was one of the most evil things an elected official could do.

Or is that only when a Democrat does it?
edit on 15-1-2016 by Flatfish because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Flatfish

Well I don't complain about EO's, so don't look at me.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

Where has the federal government mitigated a failure to the states? Are you implying that because Brownback took measures into his own hands that constitutes what you are saying?


Immigrant re-locations are a good example.

The ones "waiting for" a court hearing and not showing up become a problem for the States.




posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I don't see that as "mitigating" a problem to the states. That's just a problem that arises out of trying to get a court hearing for people.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Flatfish

Well I don't complain about EO's, so don't look at me.


I don't have a problem with the either.

I was just wondering why the GOP seems to only have a "part-time" problem with them.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Flatfish

Yea, I'm not really trying to go there as I'm trying to keep the discussion as unpartisan as possible.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen

I don't see that as "mitigating" a problem to the states. That's just a problem that arises out of trying to get a court hearing for people.


You could be right.

DHS Report: 84% of Illegal Alien Adults Not In Court For Final Case Hearing

Then there's the crime issues during and afterwards.

No pressure on local and state authorities I suppose, especially in sanctuary cities.




posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Learningman

Don't worry man,we;ll smuggle you over and gun you up for a respose



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Well we are getting a bit offtopic now. You are trying to bring up illegal aliens and the problems around handling them, but I'm talking about war refugees in this OP.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I agree they should ban from all coutries at the moment...maybe we should put a time limit on it...

This cuts away from the cries of discrimination
edit on 15-1-2016 by GraffikPleasure because: Stupid autocorrect



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: GraffikPleasure

Why?



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Glad you feel that way. I'm in the same camp with you...fema comes to mind.

I'm talking about foreign invaders. Sorry but I know you want our military to fight an oncoming invasion of America, not exactly this situation, but that's my point of what the fed was designed for...not food stamps and take over healthcare etc



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

I used and modified that statement because it has been used on the left...thank you for making my points for me!

So my question is...why take the risk of letting them come here. We know there are some terrorists with them



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Why bring them...why do they need to come here?



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: GraffikPleasure

So my question is...why take the risk of letting them come here. We know there are some terrorists with them


Actually we don't know that at all. That is an assumption.



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: GraffikPleasure
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Why bring them...why do they need to come here?


Because they are scared for their lives and have nowhere else to go. It's the American thing to do. It shows we aren't going to fear the total because of the few. It shows we aren't scared of our own shadows.
edit on 15-1-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

Taking a few hundred HEAVILY vetted I can get behind and I agree...but who is doing the vetting. Wasn't these just s report how Obama didn't sign off on better vetting...I'd look it up but I'm on my phone at work



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join