It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: symphonyofblase
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Ghost147
Why don't people just go back to the roots of animism and shamanism? Seems like it would be a lot more "pure" and not diluted/polluted with agendas?
I can listen to a cover band play a Beatles song, but there's nothing like the original thing. To me, that's what these modern (within the last 2,000 years) religions are...tribute and cover bands of much older practices. These newer faiths have a lot of baggage attached to themselves....
Can one be a religious hipster? If so, shamanism FTW all day. All that new fangled stuff is just man messing around and adding a bunch of useless showy and flashy layers...which serve to enslave and diminish the individual...
Anytime you want to gain control over a population, just reinvent the religion and claim you know all the secrets, you know what happens when you die. That's how you get a little following going, as people are terribly afraid of death. If you keep people afraid, especially over something like death and the afterlife (which can't be proved) -- you can get people to kill and die for you.
Humans, we're programmed to follow people who sound like they know what they're doing.
Because, if you bother to read the bible, it predates animism and shamanism.
Not that I care.
originally posted by: symphonyofblase
a reply to: Ghost147
Why do you single out the Christian bible? They're all a bunch of fairy tales.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Ghost147
Why don't people just go back to the roots of animism and shamanism? Seems like it would be a lot more "pure" and not diluted/polluted with agendas?
originally posted by: symphonyofblase
Because, if you bother to read the bible, it predates animism and shamanism.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Children are being raised by parents who vote for the people in office, who's agenda is inclusive of things like this.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
How one should raise a child in this country is up to the parents and today parents, are allowed to teach there children at home. There are guidelines that clearly are generalizations and subject to the parents interpretation.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
I agree that children should be taught with an open mind to all possibilities
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
A point being is that is, that in many countries on Earth. The issue of what religious practice one should follow was punishable by death in the Majority 100 years ago and today the same applies to many countries.
originally posted by: UniFinity
a reply to: Ghost147
Children are indoctrinated and despite you concerns, there is really no evidence to suggest that what we today are able to conceive as possible. In reality relates beyond the 3 or 5% percent of reality that we currently comprehend.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
100 years ago most only knew how to read and wright. I am not a Constitutional Lawyer and despite the fact that our current President is (and from Harvard) and Senator Ted Cruz (given memory serves from Yale). Consider how different there interpretations are of the Constitution of the United States.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
The problem with your position is that it could in interpretation, relate to a false conclusion.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
This country functions and its apparent given my example of President Barrack Obama and Senator Ted Cruz in a different way.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
I have concluded you have a bipolar disorder that is clearly borderline if it makes you feel better
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Christian based laws in the United States are commonly argued in relation to issues related to abortion, also in respect to religious edifices placed upon government land. In actuality had you been actually paying attention to issues related to Legal Arguments, related to Church and State in the US....well you are clearly wrong that such issues have not been brought up in the last 5 years.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
In context there is also relatable the argument made by Donald Trump that Muslims despite the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States should be modified. To disallow people based upon religious beliefs, be allowed in this country.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
It seems you are trying to apply a generic definition of the US Constitution and when it fact it does not actually apply
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
I feel your interpretation of issues outside of what you commonly are exposed to are in all probability stereotypes.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Your insistences this way are indicative of an obsessive disorder in that you seem to keep insisting, you understand things that you really do not.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
what does any of this have to do with Authors of the Bible: The Greatest Plagiarism Ever Believed?
that is the topic here, is it not?
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: TzarChasm
what does any of this have to do with Authors of the Bible: The Greatest Plagiarism Ever Believed?
that is the topic here, is it not?
That's what I've been saying for the mast 10 responses to Kashai. For some reason he insists on arguing a point which makes no sense, and has nothing to do with the topic.