It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest
Three High Holy Feasts per year (Passover, Pentecost, and Atonement) say you're mistaken.
Nonsense! Those holy days don't celebrate or prophecy a dying god.
Well, you declared it to be "nonsense", so it certainly must be true. Most people support their opinions with facts, but you must be exempt from that.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
In relation to how that funding is used as in all States in the Union it is well within its rights to apply that funding in the context of the support inherent the majority of its population
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
So unless you live in Texas and in so far as your taxpayer dollars the likelihood that it is being used to fund the Texas school system. In all probability is a null hypothesis on your part and you simply do not understand how things actually work.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
The thing is this, when it comes to Atheist scientist claims that God can be shown not to exist really is irrelevant to the discussion.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Proving a negative is irrelevant and that is also obvious in relation to what is know today about science.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
The whole is case is apparent when addressing the issue of the Singularity of a Black Hole. I laugh whenever someone suggests that believing in God is not different than believing in a Green Spaghetti Monster. This is because in relation to what we comprehend of the Singularities of a Black Hole?
Our math presents Infinity, in which case anything in fact is possible.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
So in so far as Science there is no way to Objectify Atheism despite your beliefs that it can.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
You fail to understand that the Majority of Christians are not secular
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Yes of course there are many who are and the majority such individuals are good people who live their lives in relative peace
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
The problem you seem to not understand seem to understand is that literal translation of the Holy Bible relates to, not just religious extremism. But also a Philosophy that relates upon how to live ones life.
Clearly your Achilles in this your OP and subsequent discourse with respect to the topic.
originally posted by: spygeek
Interesting thread ghost, S+F!
I've been following you a while now and I have to say i am impressed by your intelligence, rationality, and humility. You are in my opinion the most valuable member of the ats community and you have done more to advance the denial of ignorance and education of others than anyone else I have seen on ats.
originally posted by: spygeek
People like you give me faith that one day the general populace of the USA may finally catch up to the rest of the western world who understand the difference between living a good humanitarian life and living an ignorantly pious one.
Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[3][4][5] Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist.[4][5][6][7] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[8][9] which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.[9][10][11]
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Ancient belief systems and their comprehension are not necessarily related to modern interpretation. Words as defined today do not in some factual context imply that thousands of years ago one could interpret meaning as absolutely related to how such terms were defined in the past.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Just as you present in your comments that others agree with you position and that constitutes evidence that you position can be implied as valid, which for the record is meaningless.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
You ask me to provide you evidence that Christians could be secular yet you fail to understand that if they were not?
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Such a thing as an Atheists would not exist upon this planet.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
It is on topic, as you have presented that science can be taught without taking into consideration religion. Despite the fact you cannot provide physical evidence that supports your position.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
You have presented that because you cannot see evidence of God, God does not exist.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Literally what objective basis does anyone really have to support your position?
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
None actually, as in fact scientist that support atheism do not do science justice by supporting such a claim.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Again friend I suggest you stop presenting such a Grandiose Position, that in reality is only related to your Ideology.
Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[3][4][5] Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist.[4][5][6][7] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[8][9] which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.[9][10][11]
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
In a broad sense if you which to suggest that God could exist then you are not an Atheist, you are an Agnostic.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Perhaps a Closet Agnostic unwilling to admit that your tendency to support an alternative position to the above is not and specifically and factually Agnosticism.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
Again friend I suggest you stop presenting such a Grandiose Position, that in reality is only related to your Ideology.
Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[3][4][5] Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist.[4][5][6][7] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[8][9] which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.[9][10][11]
Source
In a broad sense if you which to suggest that God could exist then you are not an Atheist, you are an Agnostic.
Perhaps a Closet Agnostic unwilling to admit that your tendency to support an alternative position to the above is not and specifically and factually Agnosticism.
Atheism and agnosticism are not entirely mutually exclusive, and atheists are not "actually agnostic because no one can ever know whether God exists." This is a highly contested point among religious believers and atheistic philosophers alike, as most, if not all, thinking atheists would happily change their minds given the right evidence, and thus could be considered "agnostic" in this sense. However, this conflates the ideas of belief and knowledge. Atheism is a statement of a lack of belief, and not a lack of knowledge - which is often accepted on all sides of the theistic debate. Atheism takes the position that it is rational to think that gods don't exist, based on logic and lack of evidence. Agnostics, on the other hand, state that the lack of knowledge cannot inform their opinion at all. There are agnostic atheists, who can be either weak or strong. It is at least logically possible for a theist to be an agnostic (e.g., "I believe in a pantheon of lobsterish zoomorphic deities, but cannot prove this with evidence, and acknowledge and embrace that my belief is rooted in faith")—but it is markedly difficult to find anyone who will fess up to such a position.
I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
-American Sociological Review.
To be an atheist in such an environment is not to be one more religious minority among many in a strongly pluralist society. Rather, Americans construct the atheist as the symbolic representation of one who rejects the basis for moral solidarity and cultural membership in American society altogether.
originally posted by: Kashai
Once you can present how a negative can be proven then you can offer as to why Atheism is not different than religion in that respect.
The rest of your commentary is nonsense and unrelated to rational conversation in relation to fact.
originally posted by: Kashai
Once you can present how a negative can be proven then you can offer as to why Atheism is not different than religion in that respect
originally posted by: Kashai
There is no scientific support for the Ghost147's position, despite he or she has claimed that there is.
originally posted by: Kashai
There is not evidence to support that
a negative can be proven.
originally posted by: Kashai
While there is scientific support that anything is possible given the works of the best minds
of this Epoch.
originally posted by: Kashai
Religion in general has an intrinsic quality beyond any literal translation of its artifacts, that is obvious.
originally posted by: Kashai
Ghost147 in his commentary clearly chooses to ignore that issue to the detriment of his argument.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
To be obvious I have provided mathematical evidence that God can exist.
originally posted by: Kashai
In relation to what is current with respect to understanding what is a singularity and in respect to a Black Hole. God can be shown to exist in relation to the obvious fact that mankind has not even one tenth of a percent, in relation to comprehending what reality in fact is.
originally posted by: Kashai
These are truths as evident as the nose on your face and undeniable in rational conversation.
originally posted by: Kashai
You claim that you support a position that God could exist.
originally posted by: Kashai
Despite that fact you deny it from the materialistic contextif treating the Holy Bible as literal.
originally posted by: Kashai
The majority of the people in this world that are religious do not treat there beliefsas absolute.
originally posted by: Kashai
A Secular Christian is one who relates to the Holy Bible as a book related to symbols.
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Ghost147
That Religion relates to moral values.
Sure there are some that abuse religion in an effort to promote a Negative Agenda (like Isis).
But the majority of people in this world relate philosophically to religion and not literally.