I have been watching this guy's videos for a couple of months now. I do believe that his message is very real, and coming quickly to a world near
The data and correlations he presents are eye opening, to say the least.
We all know that things aren't exactly on the "up and up". Those of us that search for answers seldom find what we are looking for, and sometimes
it is far worse than we imagine.
The worst part is, that the figures that we all have been brought up to "trust" to give us the answers are playing a very dangerous game in keeping
information to themselves to prepare for the future, and quite literally leaving us out in the cold. I haven't trusted anything the "ordained
ministers of information" have fed us for a good number of years. It saddens me to know that so many people still do...
I hope that ATS can check this out.
I hope that people can come together and help one another through the times that are ahead.
We love to argue about elections, rights, duties and the like, but I don't see enough agreement that unification behind survival is the only true
cause to rally.
I am just as guilty. I'm an imperfect human, sue me.
Check out the video, see what it has to say and chime in. This isn't the only dude out there that is spreading this information.
Hah! We just finished out the second warmest year on record. The mini ice age nonsense that will come about in a couple of decades won't even be
enough to put a dent in the upward trend due to AGW. Guy is off his rocker.
I don't. The solar cycle data points to us coming into a grand solar minimum, if not this cycle, then the next.
Then what? Nobody alive has been through one of these "grand solar minimum" events. How do you think a coddled populace would react? Life has been
so simple for decades through technological advancement, and general abundance.
Have a look at the graph at the bottom of the page on Space Weather News and tell me what you think.
Do some more research. The estimated effect of this "grand solar minimum" amounts to less than .3c. No collapse, no cold, just less extreme hot
masking the effects of our actions for a decade or so. It buys us some time, I'm all for that... but let's not start thinking we're in the clear just
Oh, I get it... some blogger and yourself who don't know how to take in all the necessary information and weigh it properly... that's legit... but
climate scientists... they are clueless.
edit on 12-1-2016 by pl3bscheese because: (no reason given)
I saw somewhere on internet that guy who post the truth about climate will be raided by the NSA and the FBI.
NB: At least be fair! If you don't thrust scientist that work so hard for truth, give you article and info that took many years of work, then don't
trust a random guy that post an hour video on Youtube. Rest in doubt and seek the truth with better tools.
They've 'various scientists from Russia and USA' amongst others, have discussed this since the seventies, and how the future would become much cooler.
a mini ice age. Maybe that's why so many Scientists aka dozens upon dozens re.. see rense.com, have been snuffed out in the past few years?
I say good, can't wait.
Note: i cited rense not because i love his mullet or his arrogance... i cited it simply for one reason alone, and that was the list i saw on it
several years ago with dead scientist after dead scientist on it, a very long long long list i might add. With names and how they died which none of
were from normal circumstances.
Try scholar.google.ca... and search about your subject (some article a free). The scientific community is always arguing, you will probably find
one or two articles going your way in the pool of those going against. May be you hold the truth, but the argument right now is really weak...
And please, you may like rense.com, but this is not a guenuine source. I like to listen to Alex Johns, but is too often bull# for me to cite.
That's not it at all. Scientists can have their "years of hard work" manipulated. It is a matter of funding after all. A considerable amount of
"science" has been presented to the general populace only to be debunked at a later date when few are paying attention.
Data analysts, on the other hand, they only rely on their own research to compile the available data, and distribute it. No super hard work, just
distribution of an alternative conclusion without political intrusion. Take from it what you will.
Yes, there are junk, but do you think there are less junk on YouTube? And doing that little research will worth every penny. Next time some tell
you're not serious you will be able to pop one or two articles!
edit on 12-1-2016 by PersonneX because: (no reason given)
I find that a little funy that pair reviewed (by really good people in the domain) article get less credit than a YouTube video. If those are
manipulated, don't you think those on YouTube can be? Why article on internet aren't bull#, but those writen by people that does that for living are?
I don't understant.
seems to me if this mini ice age is a cycle, it should be starting around every two hundred years and is unrelated to the cycle he is talking about.
That would put it around 2030 as a start.
There are a lot of variables he is not considering. Now, planet alignment could possibly trigger more volcanic activity, I won't argue that.
I know the government would not do something to panic people, they would not tell us if something like this was going to happen. But it just doesn't
seem as if this guy's stuff is right. I would worry more about a collapse of our messed up economies, their crashes are inevitable.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.