It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
A small adapter will be available to plug incompatible headphones into the iPhone 7.
To save everyone who feels like crying because of innovation.
That's not innovation, that's a cash grab by Apple, just like the lightning chargers were. There is nothing 'innovative' about wireless headphones, they exist right now.
A manufacturer forcing it's consumers who purchase their products ( at a huge premium as well)into buying ridiculous adapters for backwards compatibility with existing hardware, is nothing but them attempting to raise their stock prices via sale of proprietary hardware.
Besides, Apple is always years behind the innovation curve. Take any Android device released between 2012 and today and you'll see that they were most, if not all much further ahead in terms of capability than any of the Iphones available at the time.
~Tenth
I haven't really looked into this because wires instead of BT are fine with me, but is there a bottneck? Bluetooth data rate not high enough and that's why a crappy codec is used, or would a better BT codec give better results with existing bandwidth?
originally posted by: Bedlam
However, after being run through a lossy BT codec, there is a very detectable difference.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I haven't really looked into this because wires instead of BT are fine with me, but is there a bottneck? Bluetooth data rate not high enough and that's why a crappy codec is used, or would a better BT codec give better results with existing bandwidth?
originally posted by: Bedlam
However, after being run through a lossy BT codec, there is a very detectable difference.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
But if i am not trying to record music, or listening to recordings on a forensic level, i can't see how the marginal loss of audible range would really matter to 99% of the population
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: tothetenthpower
There is absolutely no reason to believe an analog signal travelling the extra journey down a wire will sound better than an analog signal travelling the short distance of the DAC to the transducer.