It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Philly Police Officer Shot In Patrol Car "In The Name Of Islam"- Sources

page: 4
31
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: UnBreakable


I see you have difficulty in your comprehension skills. Religion of the suspect would've been irrelevant if it wasn't for the fact that he himself said he did it in the name of Islam.

Redundantly…

Who cares what killers say, they're killers!


First off, the cop is recovering, he wasn't killed. Secondly if someone killed a relative or loved one of yours, you wouldn't want to know 'why' i.e. what the perp 'said' as to why they were targeted? What a person 'says' is a motivation and is important in a court of law. Unfortunately even if it doesn't agree with your narrative and agenda.




posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: LSU0408

Very gracious, no problem.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

The officer apparently has a broken arm, as well as nerve damage. He might not be able to work again if the damage is too extensive or irreparable.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   
Do you truly believe it is hard to smuggle guns into UK? I only ask because Manchester at the moment has armed police everywhere because of several shootings relating to gang culture. I live in a small town and they were here a few weeks ago (tactical team that is) because three men in balaclavas paid a local drug dealer a visit, they had guns. So if all the criminals in this Country can get hold of one it cant be that hard can it?a reply to: crazyewok



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Please go board a plane and define your boarders thanks.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: 123143




He did it "in the name of Islam".

That is TERRORISM.



According to most definitions it is not terrorism
Furthermore how does a 1 on 1 gunfight even look like classic terrorism?



terrorism
ˈtɛrərɪzəm/Submit
noun
the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.


So you're saying 1 (a lone wolf) isn't "classic terrorism", whatever that is? Yes, it can be terrorism. In fact, that'll be the new brand here in the future, as working in "cells" here in the US is more difficult to coordinate.



Actually, attacks in the US will not be classified as Terrorism if certain criteria aren't met.

Such as the attack being claimed by an organization.

NLBS did an episode where they talked a bit about how violent acts are being classified. If him claiming his motivation was for religious reasons made it Terrorism then there would be a lot more US citizens classified as terrorists.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 8-1-2016 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable


What a person 'says' is a motivation and is important in a court of law.

Until it does come out in a court of law its here-say, especially in the court of public opinion. You belittle the process of investigation and justice by regurgitating what is accepted as the truth, let alone advancing it as truth, from a main stream media perspective.

The relatives could care less what prompted said asshole to shoot their son or husband.

Unless they also see terrorists behind every bush.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Brother I like you, but to act like we do not understand the context of terrorism in THIS day and age is foolish. This whole mass media narrative bull# is getting sour and honestly the mass media is doing anything it can to label actions domestic ,or mental illness ,we are at WAR with a enemy who refuses to draw boarders, or put on a uniform, a patient enemy,and a political and beurocratic society equals defeat.


+2 more 
posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   
There are only a few things that will foil or shorten a terror attack, law enforcement on the scene, armed citizens, or the terrorists killing themselves prematurely.

Guess which groups are being targeted by the Left, that's right, law enforcement (BLack Lives Matter shouting kill piggy ring a bell?), and citizens right to bear arms.

The Left are actively facilitating, aiding and abetting, pursuing common goals with terror cells already planted and being planned, and they don't care.

Do you?



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Teddy916

originally posted by: intrptr


UPDATE: Sources say the suspect confessed to shooting the officer "In The Name Of Islam"

What religion dude says he has is ireleveant.


Not exactly. With the suspect saying he did this for "Islam" I expect people who fear Muslims to use this as fuel for their distrusts of Muslims.

Fanning the flames of Islamaphobia, on the medias part. Same here, watch the response.


Nobody but the perpetrator has fanned any flames. We are just watching the fire spread.
Oh yeah, I also laughed when I red the first post about this being a one off crazy who likes islam [yet another in a long line of 'one offs'...]

Conspiracy is of course he is a right wing stirrer who wants us to hate muslims.

Whatever the truth, the intention and the mentioning of islam in this case matters a lot. A LOT!



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: UnBreakable


What a person 'says' is a motivation and is important in a court of law.

Until it does come out in a court of law its here-say, especially in the court of public opinion. You belittle the process of investigation and justice by regurgitating what is accepted as the truth, let alone advancing it as truth, from a main stream media perspective.

The relatives could care less what prompted said asshole to shoot their son or husband.

Unless they also see terrorists behind every bush.



Uh, the Phila. police said he confessed, it wasn't a main stream media perspective.

"POLICE: SUSPECT CONFESSED TO PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER SHOOTING 'IN NAME OF ISLAM'"
6abc.com...
edit on 1jY by UnBreakable because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: 123143




He did it "in the name of Islam".

That is TERRORISM.



According to most definitions it is not terrorism
Furthermore how does a 1 on 1 gunfight even look like classic terrorism?



terrorism
ˈtɛrərɪzəm/Submit
noun
the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.


So you're saying 1 (a lone wolf) isn't "classic terrorism", whatever that is? Yes, it can be terrorism. In fact, that'll be the new brand here in the future, as working in "cells" here in the US is more difficult to coordinate.



Actually, attacks in the US will not be classified as Terrorism if certain criteria aren't met.

Such as the attack being claimed by an organization.

NLBS did an episode where they talked a bit about how violent acts are being classified. If him claiming his motivation was for religious reasons made it Terrorism then there would be a lot more US citizens classified as terrorists.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



but we can classify a group of people in Oregon who have taken no violent action against anyone as terrorists.

Yet this man attacked someone in the name of religion, and his actions are deemed not to be terroristic

Im seeing a really nasty double standard by some parties here in the US, why rush to defend one group but then basically mark the others?

Love Love,
AlienSupernova
edit on 8-1-2016 by AlienSupernova because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Grimpachi

Brother I like you, but to act like we do not understand the context of terrorism in THIS day and age is foolish. This whole mass media narrative bull# is getting sour and honestly the mass media is doing anything it can to label actions domestic ,or mental illness ,we are at WAR with a enemy who refuses to draw boarders, or put on a uniform, a patient enemy,and a political and beurocratic society equals defeat.


There are a lot of things I agree with you on, but if this act is labeled as terrorism then there are a lot of people holding a double standard.

When the guy shot up planned parenthood it wasn't classified as terrorism when there were groups of people blowing up abortion clinics and murdering people that even claimed affiliation with AOG it wasn't classified as terrorism when members of the KKK commit violent acts it isn't labeled as terrorism. There are a great many violent crimes committed in the US motivated by ideologies and or religious reasons that are not categorized as terrorism and most are not related to Islam.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
There are only a few things that will foil or shorten a terror attack, law enforcement on the scene, armed citizens, or the terrorists killing themselves prematurely.

Guess which groups are being targeted by the Left, that's right, law enforcement (BLack Lives Matter shouting kill piggy ring a bell?), and citizens right to bear arms.

The Left are actively facilitating, aiding and abetting, pursuing common goals with terror cells already planted and being planned, and they don't care.

Do you?


That is pure BS. The Left does none of those things, Islam does none of those things, BLM does none of those things anymore than The Right, Christianity etc... does.

Individuals or groups who have some sort of twisted, extreme perception of ideologies and beliefs do these things. There's plenty of people on all sides that serve as examples.

In my opinion people who believe in such as you posted above, walk a very fine line of becoming examples themselves.
edit on 1/8/2016 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   
He pledged alliance to ISIS in police interview.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
He pledged alliance to ISIS in police interview.

Where did you read this?



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: AlienSupernova




but we can classify a group of people in Oregon who have taken no violent action against anyone as terrorists.



You can, but it wouldn't be true.




Yet this man attacked someone in the name of religion, and his actions are deemed not to be terroristic


Such doesn't classify a person as a terrorist. Radical, extremist, or nutjob will all fit though.





Im seeing a really nasty double standard by some parties here in the US, why rush to defend one group but then basically mark the others?


There does seem to be a double standard with the public. BTW if you are actually interested in what I have said on the Bundy issue here is the link www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 8-1-2016 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   
Have they announced if the gun was registered?

Or if his doctor had reported him to the FBI database?

These are important questions.




posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Im watching foxnews now.



posted on Jan, 8 2016 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The gun was stolen from that cop.




top topics



 
31
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join