It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

South Korea to resume propaganda broadcasts to North over test

page: 2
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2016 @ 05:00 AM
link   
I doubt China is willing to do anything substantial regarding NK, if they went in to sort out Kimmy boy they would then be responsible for the welfare of millions of North Koreans, a very expensive option, sadly.
I say sadly because we often forget the miserable lives of the average North Korean people... eating grass to survive... whole generations of families never seeing the outside of forced labour camps.




posted on Jan, 16 2016 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Guess this is your Monkey Wrench in your "Bad bad N.Korea" propaganda campaign:

North Korea says peace treaty, halt to exercises, would end nuclear tests

Here's N.Korean diplomatic response:


"Still valid are all proposals for preserving peace and stability on the peninsula and in Northeast Asia including the ones for ceasing our nuclear test and the conclusion of a peace treaty in return for U.S. halt to joint military exercises," North Korea's official KCNA news agency cited a spokesman for the country's foreign ministry as saying early on Saturday.


Here's united states. . . err. . . S.Korea's response:



But asked if the United States would consider a halt to joint exercises, U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said it had alliance commitments to South Korea.

"We are going to continue to make sure the alliance is ready in all respects to act in defense of the South Korean people and the security of the peninsula," he told a regular news briefing.

So in a nutshell - NO - united states WANT to keep the Korean peninsula in a "Perpetual State of War"



*** N. Korea to US: Stop drills, sign peace treaty if you want end to nuclear tests



Pyongyang also wants an end to the US undertaking military exercises with South Korea. In August, 2015, North Korea warned the US it would “respond accordingly” if Washington did not cancel military exercises with Seoul.



Well, DUH! What else can any other country expect from the MOST WAR-MONGERING country in the world!??

At least ONE country is offering PEACE - when the other is offering WAR!
edit on 16-1-2016 by SurrenderingIsBack because: damn straight



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 12:17 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

Not at all.. In case you missed it N. Korea invaded S.Korea, starting this mess. The US and other countries present in S. Korea are present at the request of S. Korea and authorized by the UN.

If kimmy were serious about peace they should stop threatening to rain down terror on S. Korea and the US.

Our presence is defensive and will remain that way until Kimmy settles down. Secondly N. Korea has played the bait and switch game to the point they arent believed anymore. I would wager if a treaty is signed Kimmy would continue the nuke tests to the point of trying to extort something else from other countries.

Little Kimmy doesn't have a lot of time left. At the rate he is mismanaging / miscalculating his government is going to implode and thats only if a coup doesn't occur first.



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Lol - says the country that silently took over S.Korea.


PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY - - U.S. HAS AS MANY SHIPS, AIRCRAFT, CARRIERS, NUCLEAR CAPABLE CRAFTS, & every single M.I.C. wet dream is stationed/positioned there??

Here for some context: "All Hail S.Korean's Emperor" SMH


[insert new S.Korean Emperor]



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

Because they can so you should stop being jealous of it.

S. Korea was not taken over by the US so check the typical propaganda at the door.

N. Korea has the 4th largest military in the world and S. Korea can request what ever help they want from what ever nation they choose. Just like N. Korea does.

The fact you are bouncing all over the place while posting pictures with lame caption tells me you have nothing of substance to add.
edit on 17-1-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Which substance would that be?

I guess you missed that whole Emperor riding in Façade


List when united states ride in like that within the recent years. . . I'll wait.

Here's the latest:


Keep TRYING to move the goal posts. . . And I'll keep nailing your ass to them



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

Like I said nothing of substance to the debate / conversation. You went from peace treaty to making false claims about S. Korea.

Wanna try again and maybe make it relevant and on topic?



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Sure - - Do you think united states will accept N.Koreas PEACE TREATY?


edit on 17-1-2016 by SurrenderingIsBack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 01:13 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

The US is the wrong country to ask since its the 2 Korea's that are still at war. The question should be will S. Korea accept it. Given the history of N. Korea its doubtful.



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 01:14 AM
link   
I'm not so sure who's more pleasant to be here posting: You or Your handlers:

In any case - On behalf of Americans:



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

ad yet the fact remains its up to S. Korea and not the US. Secondly where in this peace offer does it include S. Korea?

Oh wait.. it doesn't include S. Korea. They want a treaty with just the US. My guess is its an attempt to remove the US from S. Korea so the North gets an upper hand when dealing with S. Korea.

If the north were serious the peace would include all involved nations and not just the US.
edit on 17-1-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2016 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

QUIT SQUIRMING!!

It's not consistent of gentlmenly behavior.


N.Korea reached out & offered PEACE - yet you squirm?

- Do you want military conflicts or NOT? Do You Seek Re-Unification between the Korean Peninsula or Not?
- Simple: Yes or No answer.

One side has reached out - YOUR MOVE!



posted on Jan, 19 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

No north korea didnt. They offered it to the US only and no other nations.

Please show us where NK offered peace to S. Korea.

Never mind don't bother because NK hasn't.



posted on Jan, 22 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Germany invaded the world yet 50 years on and relations have stabilized. It's possible, however, I think China would rather risk a belligerent but easy to control neighbor as a buffer, rather than have a unified country that could agree to more US bases on Chinese borders. They would probably like unification if the north or Chinese leaning governments were put in place. I don't see that happening.



posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

No north korea didnt. They offered it to the US only and no other nations.

Please show us where NK offered peace to S. Korea.

Never mind don't bother because NK hasn't.[/quote

Way to shift goal posts - Pretty pathetic that N.Korea has to offer peace treaty to U.S. instead of S.Korea - Just shows who's actually in charge in S.Korea. . . But hey, don't provide proof that S.Korea can speak for themselves w/out U.S. puppeteering them. . .

Thanks for highlighting that!

edit on 23-1-2016 by SurrenderingIsBack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: SurrenderingIsBack

No it means lil kimmy wants the US out of S. Korea to better their chances of winning a war lil kimmy is going to start. Secondly the US doesnt control S. Korea as much as you want to believe it does.

A peace treaty should include all nations involved in the UN mandate and not just the US. We have a right to defend our allies just as thoose 2 or 3 countries that support N. Korea.

If kim wants peace then why offer it to one nation? Sounds like he wants war and is trying to hedge his bet.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 07:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Still encouraging U.S. control over S.Korea - figures.

N.Korea doesn't want war - You dummy. Thats the propaganda that you're gobbling up. Hence the Peace talks. However, united states & their M.I.C. doesn't want Peace nor Unification. You should know better than that. . .

Why United Nations? S.Korea is a Non-Permanent Member. . .

Why do you always fall back on United Nations in your discussions?


LoL - what nation should N.Korea offer Peace too? United States? On one hand you say that S.Korea isn't puppeteered by united states & then you say "why offer it to one nation?" Hypocrisy much. . .
edit on 24-1-2016 by SurrenderingIsBack because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-1-2016 by SurrenderingIsBack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 07:25 AM
link   
Back on topic:
North Korea says peace treaty, halt to exercises, would end nuclear tests

This again, highlights my discussion . . .



Speaking of propaganda - S.Korea does, N.Korea does as well:
North Korea retaliates against South with loudspeaker propaganda

This discussion is over.



posted on Feb, 2 2016 @ 02:44 AM
link   
The move has LED D.P.R.K. to start similar broadcasts of its own, the South's Yonhap press agency aforementioned.The international organisation has in agreement to draw up new measures against D.P.R.K..Although there's disbelief that D.P.R.K. distributed the check as claimed, its actions are condemned internationally.If the underground check is confirmed, it might be the North's fourth nuclear check and its initial of the thermonuclear bomb, that is additional powerful than AN bomb.The loudspeakers - at eleven locations on the border - blast Korean pop, news and weather reports click here and criticisms of the North over the border.British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, on a visit to Japan, urged the South to indicate restraint, language that resuming the broadcasts was "simply rising to the bait".The broadcasts irritate the authorities in capital of North Korea, and D.P.R.K. has antecedently vulnerable to use force to prevent them.Seoul in agreement to prevent them last year in an exceedingly modify the North to resolve notably high tensions once a border skirmish.But presidential security official Cho Tae-yong proclaimed on Thursday that they'd resume, language the North's check claim had been a "grave violation" of the deal.



posted on Feb, 2 2016 @ 04:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: SurrenderingIsBack
a reply to: Xcathdra

QUIT SQUIRMING!!

It's not consistent of gentlmenly behavior.


N.Korea reached out & offered PEACE - yet you squirm?

- Do you want military conflicts or NOT? Do You Seek Re-Unification between the Korean Peninsula or Not?
- Simple: Yes or No answer.

One side has reached out - YOUR MOVE!


North Korea offers peace and threatens death a destruction sometimes on the same day. In both cases they are simply tools to try and get some kind of concession from the South or the West. They have been playing games like this since the war.

If the North was ever serious about a treaty the US would have no problem with it but, nobody would trust the North with a formal peace or not. They have never bother to follow any agreement before. China does not even take anything they say seriously as they have been declared dear allies and back stabbing traitors (for trade deals with the south) all in the same week. Their are mechanisms in place for the North to call a formal meeting and offer a formal deal with the US/RoK/UN if the wish to do so. Until that happens everything out of the North remains just talk.




top topics



 
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join