It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: svetlana84
a reply to: facedye
Funny enough i checked the top ten website about 3 weeks ago.
9/11 is still not listed under his accusations.
My personal opinion, (based on nothing but believe) the FBI did it on purpose.
They are not agreeing with the Official Story, did not put 9/11 in and let the site there as a silent protest.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
He's still active and living in the Caribbean according to Snowden.
Then again, Snowden also said that DNA retrieved from the person killed in Pakistan confirmed it was Usama Bin Laden.
So as confused as they have us, dark forces are building in the M.E, something dark is lurking.
On another note, can anybody remember him as Osama Bin Laden?
Navy SEAL Team Six: Unit that killed Osama bin Laden has become 'global manhunting machine with limited oversight', says report
What really happened to Navy SEAL Team 6? In August 2011, the elite special forces unit suffered the worst battlefield calamity in its history. A Taliban fighter shot down a Chinook helicopter carrying 22 Navy SEAL Team 6 members in Afghanistan. All 38 persons on board — the Navy SEAL warriors, other U.S. military personnel and seven Afghan soldiers — were killed. Grieving family members have been demanding answers. They may now get some as Congress finally opens an investigation.
The Document proving bin Laden was CIA Asset Tim Ossman
The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: wildb
interesting, indeed! i mean i'm sure you can see how an argument for both sides of the validity of these sources can be made, but that goes for most things as well.
still, let's say this article is true. i'm even more stumped as to how to reconcile that fact with this active wanted poster.